Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:57:30.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization of selection for food intake capacity in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. Kanis  and
A. G. de Vries
E. Kanis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. G. de Vries
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Optimum selection directions for average ad libitum food intake capacity (FIC) in growing pigs were derived by means of a biological growth model based on the linear/plateau relationship between protein deposition and food intake. Breeding goal traits were minimum fat to protein deposition ratio (R), maximum protein deposition rate (Pdmax) and FIC. The selection index included FIC, daily weight gain (DG), backfat thickness and proportion of lean meat in the carcass of a full-sib.

Selection indexes were developed for three alternative levels of FIC. If FIC was too low to realize Pdmax, the economic weight of FIC was positive and optimal selection emphasis should be mainly on FIC, resulting in a rapid increase of DG. If FIC was higher than necessary to realize Pdmax, the economic weight of FIC was negative, and short-term selection resulted in increase of carcass leanness but decrease of FIC and DG. If FIC was just sufficient to realize Pdmax, selection should be for R and Pdmax. In this third alternative, the gain in FIC should follow the gain in R and Pdmax in an optimal way and selection should best be carried out with a desired gains index, which results in improvement of DG and carcass leanness.

It was shown that, in cases where FIC was higher than necessary to realize Pdmax, selection with a desired gainsindex should be preferred because this was more profitable in the long term. From the model calculations, it followed that future profit from selection of growing pigs for production traits is likely to decline because of the necessity to increase FIC.

Keywords

food intakegrowthpigsselection criteria
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , October 1992 , pp. 247 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, J. L., Campbell, R. G., Williams, I. H., James, K. J. and Davies, G. T. 1986. Simulation of energy and amino acid utilization in the pig. Research and Development Agriculture 3: 121–145.Google Scholar
Blum, J. K. 1983. [Population analysis of the Swiss Landrace and Yorkshire breed.] Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Brandt, H. 1987. Development and genetic aspects of feed intake in three breeds of pigs at German test stations and measures to prevent further deterioration. Pig News and Information 8: 29–33.Google Scholar
Brandt, H., Hong, K. Ch. and Glodek, P. 1985. [Breeding aim in German pig breeding. Part 2r lncluding food intake i n the estimation of breeding value.] Züchtungskunde. 57: 92–98.Google Scholar
Brascamp, E. W. 1984. Selection indices with constraints. Animal Breeding Abstracts. 52: 645–654.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Tavemer, M. R. 1985. Effects of strain and sex on protein and energy metabolism in growing pigs. Proceeding of the tenth symposium on energy metabolism in animals, Airlie, Virgina, European Association for Animal Production publication no. 32, pp. 78–81.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curie, D. M. 1985. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal Production 40: 497–503.Google Scholar
Cöp, W. A. G. 1974. Protein and fat deposition in pigs in relation to body weight gain and feeding level. Communications, Agricultural University, Wageningen, 74–18.Google Scholar
Ellis, M., Smith, W. C., Henderson, R., Whittemore, C. T. and Laird, R. 1983. Comparative performance and body composition of control and selection line Large White pigs. 2. Feeding to appetite for a fixed time. Animal Production 36: 407–413.Google Scholar
Foster, W. H., Kilpatrick, D. J. and Heaney, I. H. 1983. Genetic variation in the efficiency of energy utilization by the fattening pig. Animal Production 37: 387–393.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R. 1986. Biological advances towards genetic improvement in pigs. Proceedings of the third world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Vol. XI. Genetics reproduction, lactation, growth, adaptation, disease, and resistance, pp. 345–354.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., Bichard, M. and Pease, A. 1976. Objectives i n pig breeding. Animal Production 23: 365–387.Google Scholar
Hong, K. Ch. 1985. [Antagonism between meat production and food intake in German pig populations and consequences for breeding.] Ph.D. Thesis, Ceorg-August University, Gottingen.Google Scholar
Johansson, K., Andersson, K. and Lundeheim, N. 1987. Evaluation of station testing of pigs. 1. Genetic parameters for feed measurements and selection effects on voluntary feed intake. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 37: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A. and Pedersen, O. K. 1976. Danish investigations concerning body composition of pigs in relation to nutrition, sex and slaughter weight. Livestock Production Science 3: 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalm, E. and Krieter, J. 1985. [Feed intake—new selection criterion.] Bauernblatt/Landpost, 7 December, pp. 39–43.Google Scholar
Kanis, E. 1990a. Effect of food intake capacity on production traits in growing pigs with restricted feeding. Animal Production. 50: 333–341.Google Scholar
Kanis, E. 1990b. Effect of food intake capacity on genotype by feeding regimen interactions in growing pigs. Animal Production 50: 343–351.Google Scholar
Knap, P. W., Huiskes, J. H. and Kanis, E. 1985. Selection index for central test in Dutch pig herdbook breeding from 1984. Livestock Production Science 12: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieter, J. 1986. [Development of selection methods for live weight and food intake capacity in pigs.] Ph.D. Thesis, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel.Google Scholar
Leenstra, F. R. 1987. Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luiting, P. and Urff, E. M. 1987. Residual feed intake: a new source of genetic variation for feed efficiency. Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Lisbon.Google Scholar
McPhee, C. P., Brennan, P. J. and Duncalfe, F. 1979. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of Australian Large White and Landrac e boars performance-tested when offered food ad libitum. Animal Production 28: 79–85.Google Scholar
Merks, J. W. M. 1988. Genotype × environment interactions n i pig breeding programmes. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Smith, C., Makower, M. and Bird, P. J. W. N. 1982. An economic appraisal of pig improvement in Great Britain. 1. Genetic and production aspects. Animal Production 35: 215–224.Google Scholar
More O'Ferral, G. J. and Timon, V. M. 1968. Selection for body weight and tissue growth in mice. Proceedings of the ninth annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J. and Smith, W. C. 1984. Prediction of dietary protein quality based on a model of the digestio n and metabolism of nitrogen in the growing pig. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 27: 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollivier, L. 1986. Results of a long term selection experiment for lean tissue growth in the pig. Proceedings of the third world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Vol. XII. Biotechnology, selection experiments, parameter estimation, design of breeding systems, management of genetic resources, pp. 168–180.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Fowler, V. R. 1978. The importance of selection criteria and feeding regimes in the selection and improvement of pigs. Livestock Production Science 5: 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SSnnichsen, M. L. 1983. [Estimation of parameters and selection indices for Belgian Landrace and Pietrain in Schleswig-Holstein.] Ph.D. Thesis, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel.Google Scholar
Standal, N. and Vangen, O. 1985. Genetic variation and covariation in voluntary feed intake in pig selection programmes. Livestock Production Science 12: 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangen, O. 1980. Studies on a two trait selection experiment in pigs. III. Correlated responses in daily feed intake, feed conversion an d carcass traits. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 30: 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangen, O. and Kolstad, N. 1986. Genetic control of growth, composition, appetite and feed utilization in pigs and poultry. Proceedings of the third world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Vol. XI. Genetics of reproduction, lactation, growth, adaptation, disease, and parasite resistance, pp. 367–380.Google Scholar
Vries, A. G. de and Kanis, E. 1992. A growth model to estimate economic values for food intake capacity in pigs. Animal Production. 55: 241–246.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. 1986. Genetic control of growth, composition, appetite and feed utilisation: non-ruminants. Options for genetic change. Proceedings of the third world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Vol. XI. Genetics of reproduction, lactation, growth, adaptation, disease, and parasite resistance, pp. 337–344.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. and Curran, M. K. 1986. Selection regime by production system interaction in pig improvement: a review of possible causes and solutions. Livestock Production Science 14: 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1983. Development of recommende d energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems. 11: 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar