Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:51:37.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional evaluation of wheat. 5. Disappearance of components in digesta of pigs prepared with two re-entrant cannulae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Ivan  and
D. J. Farrell
M. Ivan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
D. J. Farrell
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
Get access

Summary

1. Three pigs prepared with re-entrant cannulae in the proximal duodenum and terminal ileum were used to study flow rate of nitrogen, and digestion and absorption of dry matter, nitrogen, gross energy and starch. The pigs were given a semi-purified diet, a hard wheat diet and a soft wheat diet. These were approximately isonitrogenous.

2. Nitrogen content of insoluble dry matter of duodenal digesta was much higher on the semi-purified diet than on the wheat-based diets.

3. Apparent digestibilities of dry matter, energy and nitrogen in the small intestine were in the order semi-purified diet > hard wheat > soft wheat although differences were not statistically significant. Similar results were obtained for total digestibility of these components.

4. Absorption of most amino acids from the small intestine was higher for casein in the semi-purified diet than for wheat protein. Significantly more lysine, arginine, isoleucine and tyrosine were absorbed from hard than from soft wheat.

5. With all diets there was almost complete digestion of starch in the small intestine.

6. There was little digestion of nutrients in the large intestine, and thus digestibilities calculated from faecal analyses showed similar trends to those calculated from analyses of digesta from the terminal ileum. Most values compared favourably with those reported elsewhere for digestibilities of amino acids in wheat.

7. It was concluded that casein was superior to the wheat proteins but that protein of hard wheat was of better quality than that of soft wheat when evaluated by ileal recovery of animo acids, due largely to a greater absorption of lysine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , August 1976 , pp. 111 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buraczewski, S., Porter, J. W. G., Rolls, B. A. and Zebrowska, T. 1971. The course of digestion of different food proteins in the rat. 2. The effect of feeding carbohydrate with proteins. Br. J. Nutr. 25: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, C. Y. and Bayley, H. S. 1970. Evaluations of rapeseed and soybean meals as protein sources for swine: apparent digestibilities of amino acids. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, K. R. and Coup, M. R. 1954. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 36(A): 328–330.Google Scholar
Easter, R. A. and Tanksley, T. D. Jr 1973. A technique for re-entrant ileocecal cannulation of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 1099–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggum, B. O. 1973. A study of certain factors influencing protein utilization in rats and pigs. Beretn. Forsagslab., No. 406.Google Scholar
Frape, D. L., Wilkinson, J. and Chubb, L. G. 1969. A note on the digestibility of hard and soft wheat offals in growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 11: 429–432.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S. and Horney, F. D. 1973. Digestion and absorption of dry and high-moisture maize diets in the small and large intestine of the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 30: 401–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S. and Horney, F. D. 1974. Digestion of dry and high-moisture maize diets in the stomach of the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 32: 639–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S., Leadbeater, P. A. and Horney, F. D. 1974. Digestion of protein in small and large intestine of the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 32: 479–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivan, M. 1974a. A new type of re-entrant cannula designed for use in the small intestine of the pig. Aust. vet. J. 50: 547–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivan, M. 1974b. A nutritional evaluation of wheat for pigs with a particular reference to quality and quantity of protein. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Rural Sci., Univ. New England.Google Scholar
Ivan, M., Clack, D. J. and White, G. J. 1974. Improved nitrogen distillation apparatus. Lab. Pract. 23: 184–185.Google Scholar
Ivan, M. and Farrell, D. J. 1975. Nutritional evaluation of wheat. 2. The sequence of limiting amino acids in wheats of different protein content as determined with growing rats. Anim. Prod. 20: 77–91.Google Scholar
Ivan, M., Farrell, D. J. and Edey, T. N. 1975a. Nutritional evaluation of wheat. 3. Effects of supplementation with lysine, threonine and methionine of diets based on wheat containing 13% crude protein on the performance of pigs. Anim. Prod. 20: 267–276.Google Scholar
Ivan, M., Farrell, D. J. and Edey, T. N. 1975b. Nutritional evaluation of wheat. 4. Effects of supplementation with amino acids and protein of diets based on wheats containing 10% and 17% crude protein on the performance of growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 20: 277–285.Google Scholar
Ivan, M., Giles, L. R., Alimon, A. R. and Farrell, D. J. 1974. Nutritional evaluation of wheat. 1. Effects of preparation on digestibility of dry matter, energy and nitrogen in pigs. Anim. Prod. 19: 359–365.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1970. Some effects of including differently processed barley in the diet of the growing pig. 1. Growth rate, food conversion efficiency, digestibility and rate of passage through the gut. Anim. Prod. 12: 139–150.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. 1975. A comparison of the apparent digestibility of amino acids from measurements of digesta in the terminal ileum and of faeces in growing pigs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 34: 94A–95A.Google ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. and Armstrong, D. G. 1968. Enzyme method for determination of α-linked glucose polymers in biological materials. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 19: 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. and Armstrong, D. G. 1969. Studies on intestinal digestion in the sheep. 1. The use of chromic oxide as an indigestible marker. Br. J. Nutr. 23: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, Q. R. and Harper, A. E. 1964. Transfer rates along the gastrointestinal tract. In The Role of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Protein Metabolism (ed. Munro, H. N.), pp. 3–24. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stenvert, N. L. 1972. The measurement of wheat hardness and its effect on milling characteristics. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 12: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar