Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:29:02.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the use of micronized barley for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. H. Fernandes ,
K. Hutton  and
W. C. Smith
T. H. Fernandes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
K. Hutton
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
W. C. Smith
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Get access

Summary

An experiment was undertaken to examine the effects of the micronization process followed by grinding on the chemical composition of barley and on digestibility and nitrogen (N) retention in the growing pig. Micronization relative to normal grinding increased the dry matter (DM) content and starch availability in vitro and decreased the protein content of the cereal. Retention of N was not affected by the process but apparent digestibility of the DM, N and gross energy was improved. The improvement in digestible energy content of micronized barley over the ground grain was 3·8%. In a subsequent trial 24 pigs were individually and scale-fed a diet containing 75% of barley in ground or micronized and ground form over the liveweight range 33 to 80 kg. Processing treatment did not influence growth rate, DM food conversion ratio, killing-out percentage, deposition of backfat or area of ‘eye muscle’ in cross-section.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 307 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1973a. An evaluation of the micronization process for preparing cereals for the growing pig. 1. Effects on digestibility and nitrogen retention. Anim. Prod. 16: 99–107.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1973b. An evaluation of the micronization process for preparing cereals for the growing pig. 2. Effects on growth rate, food conversion efficiency and carcass characteristics. Anim. Prod. 16: 109–116.Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., Barkes, J. N. and Tonks, H. M. 1973. The relative performance and carcass characteristics of pigs sired by Hampshire and Large White boars. Anim. Prod. 17: 59–64.Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., Tonks, H. M. and Lawrence, N. 1967. A note on the use of back rasher ratios as predictors of lean percentage of pigs of bacon weight. Anim. Prod. 9: 255–258.Google Scholar