Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:14:56.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the growth and carcass quality of Makui and Moghani lambs on different diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Nik-Khah  and
R. Assadi-Moghaddam
A. Nik-Khah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
R. Assadi-Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Get access

Summary

The effects of three diets on the performance and carcass quality of lambs of the Makui and Moghani breeds of sheep were studied. Thirty-two Makui and 33 Moghani lambs, 6 to 7 mo of age, were kept on feedlots and given three diets for 77 days. The diets each contained a barley, alfalfa meal and corn silage base plus different levels of urea, molasses and dried beet pulp.

The average daily live-weight gains (ADG) of lambs fed on diets I (no urea), II (0·8% urea) and III (1·4% urea) were 218, 208 and 204 g respectively, while feed conversion ratios (FCR) were 6·3, 6·6 and 6·8 respectively. The overall ADG for Makui and Moghani lambs were 213·6 and 206·6 g respectively and the FCR were 6·4 and 6·9 respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant. The mean dressing percentages of lambs fed on diets I, II and III were 52·5, 52·7 and 53·9 respectively, and those of Makui (53·1) and Moghani lambs (53·3) were similar. There were only minor differences between the carcass characteristics of the two breeds and these were not influenced by the different diets.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 393 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1970. Official Methods of Analysis. 11th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. and Harris, L. E. 1969. Applied Animal Nutrition. The Use of Feed-stuffs in the Formulation of Livestock Rations. 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Nik-Khah, A. and Assadi-Moghaddam, R. 1975a. Effect of high and low-cost rations on feed-lot performance and carcass traits of fattening Chall lambs. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. XI (2): 74–78.Google Scholar
Nik-Khah, A. and Assadi-Moghaddam, R. 1975b. [Nutritive value of sunflower seed hulls versus wheat straw for fattening lambs.] Publs Fac. Agron. Univ. Téhéran. In press.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles andProcedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar