Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:27:11.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the effect of dietary variety on food intake of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Ramos  and
T. Tennessen
A. Ramos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC 88 040 900, Brasil
T. Tennessen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, Nova Scotia B2N 5E3, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The possibility of using dietary variety to enhance food intake of ruminants was investigated with 36 Hereford steers. For 21 days, 18 animals were given a monotonous diet of either hay or silage, while 18 others were given a varied diet of hay and silage offered in succession, at either 12- or 24-h intervals. Dietary variety did not affect total food intake (P > 0·05). However, when offered both foods at the end of the trial, animals which had been restricted to hay showed a proportional increase of 0·15 in their acceptance of silage (P < 0·05), whereas animals restricted to silage showed an increase of 0·49 in their acceptance of hay (P < 0·05)

Keywords

diversityfeeding behaviourfood intakesteers
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 323 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartmann, R. M. and Carpenter, L. H. 1982. Effects of foraging experience on food selectivity of tame mule deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, C. W. 1943. Activities and grazing habits of sheep on summer ranges. Journal of Forestry 41: 253–258.Google Scholar
Foot, J. Z. and Russel, A. J. F. 1978. Pattern of intake of three roughage diets by non-pregnant, non-lactating Scottish Blackface ewes over a long period and the effects of previous nutritional history on current intake. Animal Production 26: 203–215.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., McWilliam, R., Pennie, K. and James, M. 1984. The effects of dietary novelty and frequency of feeding on the food intake and performance of growing pigs. Animal Production 38: 535–536 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Huber, J. T., Graf, G. C. and Engel, R. W. 1962. Palatability and digestibility of corn and grass silages fed alone and in combination to young dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 45: 290.Google Scholar
Reid, R. L. and Jung, G. A. 1965. Influence of fertilizer treatment on the intake, digestibility and palatability of tall fescue hay. Journal of Animal Science 24: 615–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolls, B. J. 1986. Sensory-specific satiety. Nutrition Reviews 44:93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolls, B. J., Rowe, E. A., Rolls, E. T., Kingston, B., Megson, A. and Gunary, R. 1981. Variety in a meal enhances food intake in man. Physiology and Behaviour 26: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, B. J., Van Duijvenvoorde, P. M. and Rowe, E. A. 1983. Variety in the diet enhances intake in a meal and contributes to the development of obesity in the rat. Physiology and Behaviour 31: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Sclafani, A. and Springer, D. 1976. Dietary obesity in adult rats: similarities to hypothalamic and human obesity syndromes. Physiology and Behaviour 17: 461–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tribe, D. E. and Gordon, J. G. 1953. The critical approach in grazing behaviour studies. British Journal of Animal Behaviour 1: 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar