Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:34:37.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the comparative performance of pigs sired by Pietrain/Hampshire and Large White boars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. C. Smith  and
W. B. Lishman
W. C. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
W. B. Lishman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Get access

Summary

Two Pietrain/Hampshire crossbred males and two Large White males were mated in equal numbers to 24 Large White females. Breed of sire did not affect litter size or total weight at birth or weaning. After weaning, on ad libitum feeding over the live-weight range 25 to 88 kg, the crossbred pigs grew more slowly to slaughter (5%) but with equal efficiency of live-weight gain. Crossbreds had higher carcass yields (3%) shorter carcasses (3%) and larger ‘eye-muscle’ areas (18%). Fat depths, joint proportions and cut-out values were not affected. The ‘eye-muscles’ of crossbreds were paler in colour and had a lower water-binding capacity than those of the purebreds, but pH1 values and transmission percentages did not differ.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 119 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Curran, M. K., Lean, I. J., Duckworth, J. E. and Holmes, W. 1972. Studies on Belgian Pietrain pigs. 2. A comparison of growth and carcass characteristics of Pietrain used in three breed crosses with Landrace, Large White and Hampshire breeds. Anim. Prod. 15: 11–19.Google Scholar
Disney, J. G., Follett, M. J. and Ratcliff, P. W. 1967. Biochemical changes in beef muscle post-mortem and the effect of rapid cooling in ice. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 18: 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, P. C. 1962. [Physico-chemical characteristics of degenerated meat in pigs. II.] Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 87: 156–167.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. 1968. [The hybridization of pigs]. Stočarstvo 22: 485–489.Google Scholar
Lean, I. J., Curran, M. K., Duckworth, J. E. and Holmes, W. 1972. Studies on Belgian Pietrain pigs. 1. A comparison of Pietrain, Landrace and Pietrain Landrace crosses in growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Anim. Prod. 15: 1–10.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1970. Hampshire pigs—removal of controls. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1971. Pietrain pigs—removal of controls. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., Tonks, H. M. and Lawrence, N. 1967. A note on the use of back rasher cratios as predictors of lean percentage in pigs of bacon weight. Anim. Prod. 9: 255–258.Google Scholar