Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:50:47.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on supplemental protein and monensin for steers wintered on dormant native range†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. W. Horn ,
S. L. Armbruster  and
P. L. Sims
G. W. Horn
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078, USA
S. L. Armbruster
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078, USA
P. L. Sims
Affiliation:
Southern Plains Range Research Station, USDA/SEA/AR, Woodward, Oklahoma 73801, USA
Get access

Abstract

Ninety-six Hereford steer calves that weighed 249(s.e.4·7)kg were allocated randomly to four treatments of 24 steers each in a randomized complete block design with four blocks. The steers grazed dormant native range forage that contained 41 to 60 g of crude protein per kg dry matter during the 120-day wintering trial and were given 0·91 kg of supplement per head per day. The supplements used contained 175 or 350 g crude protein per kg dry matter and 0 or 165 mg monensin per kg supplement; a factorial arrangement of treatments was used in allocating the supplements. Weight gains of steers given the high-protein supplements were greater than those on the low-protein supplements during periods 1(0 to 61 days) and 2 (62 to 120 days), and over the total trial (P < 0·01). Monensin increased weight gains during period 1 and the total trial (P < 0·01). The protein level × monensin interaction was not significant for either period or the total trial (P > 0·15). The results indicate that inclusion of monensin in protein supplements for growing cattle grazed on low-quality dormant native forage may allow some reduction in protein content of the supplement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 103 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barr, A. J., Goodnight, J. H., Sall, J. P. and Helwig, J. T. 1976. A User's Guide to SAS, pp. 127–244. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Dinius, D. A., Simpson, M. E. and Marsh, P. B. 1976. Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. C., Sims, P. L. and Hansen, R. M. 1971. Methods of estimating dry-weight composition in diets of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 1003–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, R. N. and Embry, L. B. 1976. Effects of monensin on dietary protein needs and nonprotein nitrogen utilization by growing feedlot cattle. Proc. Cattle Feeders' Day, S. Dak. St. Univ., Brookings, pp. 45–49.Google Scholar
Hanson, T. L. and Klopfenstein, T. 1979. Monensin, protein source and protein levels for growing steers. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, F. N. and Thornton, J. H. 1977. Research updates on recommendations concerning the use of monensin in feedlot rations. Okl. St. Univ., Stillwater, pp. D–l.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F., Raun, A. P., Potter, E. L., Cooley, C. O. and Rathmacher, R. P. 1976. Effect of monensin on rumen fermentation in vitro and in vivo. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 657–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar