Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T10:47:09.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on some factors influencing post-weaning performance of purebred and crossbred lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. P. Mavrogenis  and
A. Louca
A. P. Mavrogenis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Louca
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access

Abstract

Live weights at weaning, and 10, 15 and 20 weeks of age, and postweaning gains of 738 lambs (390 males and 348 females) obtained from purebred and crossbred lambs were studied. The main breeds involved were the Cyprus fat-tailed, Chios and Awassi. Male lambswere heavier (P< 0·01) and grew faster (P< 0·01) than female lambs. Singles were heavier (P< 0·01) than other multiples at all ages, which probably reflects differences in initial weight, since no differences were found in growth rate. Crossbred lambs were heavier at 20 weeks of age and had a faster growth rate than purebred lambs. Ewe lactation number significantly affected lamb weaning weights, the heaviest lambs being those from 3- to 5-year-old dams (third and fourth lactation).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 415 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bichard, M. and Cooper, M. McG. 1966. Analysis of production records from a lowland sheep flock. 1. Lamb mortality and growth to 16 weeks. Anim. Prod. 8: 401–410.Google Scholar
Carter, R. C, Carman, G. M., McClaugherty, F. S. and Haydon, P. S. 1971. Genotype environment interaction in sheep. II. Lamb performance traits. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 732–735.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Read, J. L. and Russell, W. S. 1963. Heterosis in crossbred hill sheep. Anim. Prod. 5: 289–299.Google Scholar
Fimland, E., Eri, J., Liland, P. J. and Gjedrem, T. 1969. Resultat fra kryssningsforsok med sau. Meld. Norg. LandbrHoisk. 13: No. 35.Google Scholar
Gjedrem, T. 1966. Selection index for ewes. Acta Agric. scand. 16: 21–29.Google Scholar
Gjedrem, T. 1967. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for weight of lambs at five ages. Acta Agric. scand. 17: 199–216.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. US Dep. Agric, ARS-H-4.Google Scholar
Hohenboken, W. D., Kennick, W. H. and Bogart, R. 1976. Genetic, environmental and interaction effects in sheep. II. Lamb growth and carcass merit. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 307–316.Google Scholar
Lawlor, M. J., Louca, A. and Mavrogenis, A. 1974. The effect of three suckling regimes on the lactation performance of Cyprus fat-tailed, Chios and Awassi sheep and the growth rate of the lambs. Anim. Prod. 18: 293–299.Google Scholar
Louca, A., Mavrogenis, A. and Lawlor, M. J. 1974. Effects of plane of nutrition in late pregnancy on lamb birth weight and milk yield in early lactation of Chios and Awassi sheep. Anim. Prod. 19: 341–349.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A., Louca, A. and Lawlor, M. J. 1973. The use of grape seed meal and barley straw in lamb fattening diets. Agric. Res. Inst. Tech. Bull. No. 12, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M., Everson, D. O. and TERRILL, CLAIR E. 1964. Lamb weights in some pure breeds and crosses. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 105–110.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M. and Miller, L. R. 1971. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. II. Birth weights and weaning weights of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 1090–1094.Google Scholar