Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:59:34.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on mating ability in clun forest ram lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Ó. R. Dýrmundsson  and
J. L. Lees
Ó. R. Dýrmundsson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
J. L. Lees
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access

Summary

Some aspects of sexual development and mating behaviour in Clun Forest ram lambs having a wide range of birth dates were studied during two seasons. The 61 ram lambs studied were introduced individually to Clun ewes in oestrus, for short periods at fortnightly intervals during late summer and autumn. Complete matings, i.e. intromission and ejaculation, were first achieved at a mean age of 6 months (range 142–223 days) and a mean body weight of 35 kg (range 24–49 kg). The attainment of physiological puberty preceded the first copulation, often by several weeks. A few individuals had abnormal testes and were partly or completely sterile, but exhibited normal mating behaviour. Early-born lambs tended to complete their first matings at a higher age and heavier body weight than late-born lambs, which suggests a possible seasonal influence on the development of breeding activity in the ram lamb.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 259 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banks, E. M. 1964. Some aspects of sexual behaviour in domestic sheep, Ovis aries. Behaviour 23: 249–279.Google Scholar
Čamuha, M. D. and Abdyldaev, D. 1969. [Progeny testing of rams at an early age.] Ovtsevodstvo. Mosk. 15(5): 30–32.Google Scholar
Gjedrem, T. 1969. Some attempts to increase the efficiency of sheep selection. Acta. Agric. scand. 19: 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, J. L. 1965. Seasonal variation in the breeding activity of rams. Nature, Land. 207: 221–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pretorius, P. S. 1967. Libido and mating dexterity in rams reared and kept in isolation from ewes. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 208–212.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. D. and Rowson, L. E. A. 1968. Puberty in Suffolk and cross-bred rams. J. Reprod. Fert. 16: 479–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, E. L., Terrill, C. E. and Emik, L. O. 1954. The effect of year, breed, age and number of ewes bred on fertility in range rams. J. Anim. Sci. 13: 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar