Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:23:34.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on conception rates and litter sizes following the intrauterine insemination of ewes at an induced oestrus during seasonal anoestrus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. P. Aitken ,
J. M. Wallace  and
J. J. Robinson
R. P. Aitken
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. M. Wallace
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Priming with a progestagen-impregnated vaginal pessary followed by an injection of 750 i.u. pregnant mare serum gonadotropin at pessary withdrawal was used to induce oestrus and ovulation during anoestrus (13 June, latitude 57°N) in 58 Border Leicester × Scottish Blackface ewes that had lambed previously in late March/early April. At 54 to 58 h after pessary withdrawal the uterus of each ewe was viewed by laparoscopy and 50 × 106 viable sperm deposited into each uterine horn. Mean ovulation rate was 2·9 (s.d. 0·12; range 1 to 5). Plasma progesterone concentrations remained >1·5 μg/l in 54 (93%) of the ewes until at least day 21 after insemination implying a high fertilization rate. After allowing for three ewes that were observed to abort between 39 and 55 days after insemination and another three, carrying nine normally developed lambs, that died between 102 and 136 days of gestation, 40 of the remaining 48 ewes (i.e. 69% of the original 58) produced 76 viable lambs in early November. These conception and lambing rates obtained following the intrauterine insemination of 100× 106 viable sperm per ewe are more than double those obtained following natural mating or conventional cervical insemination with four times the number of viable sperm and imply that intrauterine insemination may enhance lamb production from ewes induced to breed during seasonal anoestrus.

Keywords

anoestrusartificial inseminationconception rateewesovulation rate
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 379 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Colas, G. 1983. Factors affecting the quality of ram semen. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 453–465. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Djahanbahkch, O., Swanston, I. A., Corrie, J. E. T. and McNeilly, A. S. 1981. Prediction of ovulation by progesterone. Lancet (ii) 1164–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. 1969. Factors affecting response of anoestrous sheep to progestagen treatment. Journal of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Republic of Ireland 66: 232–267.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. 1983. Artificial control of oestrus and ovulation. In Controlled Breeding in Farm Animals, pp. 181–195. Pergamon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I., Caffrey, W. and Morrin, P. 1969. Induction of early breeding in sheep following treatment with progestagen-impregnated pessaries and PMSG. Journal of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Republic of Ireland 66: 212–231.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P. and Quirke, J. F. 1985. Contribution of variation in ovulation rate and embryo survival to within breed variation in litter size. In Genetics of Reproduction in Sheep (ed. Land, R. B. and Robinson, D. W.), pp. 193–201. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawk, H. W., Cooper, B. S. and Conley, H. H. 1987. Inhibition of sperm transport and fertilization in superovulating ewes. Theriogenology 28: 139–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinch, G. N., Kelly, R. W., Davis, G. H., Owens, J. L. and Crosbie, S. F. 1985. Factors affecting lamb birth weights from high fecundity Booroola ewes. Animal Reproduction Science 8: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, W. A. C., Robinson, J. J., Aitken, R. P. and Henderson, G. 1985. The evaluation of a laparoscopic insemination Theriogenology 24: 519–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhind, S. M., Robinson, J. J. and McDonald, I. 1980. Relationships among uterine and placental factors in prolific ewes and their relevance to variations in foetal weight. Animal Production 30: 115–124.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. 1988. Controlled sheep breeding: update 1980-1985. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 41: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, J. M., Robinson, J. J. and Aitken, R. P. 1989. Intrauterine insemination in superovulatcd ewes: the effects of depositing semen in one v. two uterine horns at 48 or 60 h after progestagen withdrawal. Animal Production 48: 620 (Abstr.).Google Scholar