Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:20:55.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Muscle weight distribution in lambs: a comparison of entire male and female

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. W. Butler-Hogg  and
A. J. Brown
B. W. Butler-Hogg
Affiliation:
AFRC Food Research Institute — Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
A. J. Brown
Affiliation:
AFRC Food Research Institute — Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

The carcasses of 15 ram and 15 ewe lambs of the Dorset Down breed, weight range 12 to 23 kg, were separated into individual muscles, bones and fat depots.

At the same carcass weight (16-8 kg) the ram lambs contained 41 g more muscle per kg, but there were few important differences between sexes in individual muscle weights; 65 of the 72 muscles differed in weight by less than 10 g.

The distribution of total muscle weight between eight anatomical groupings differed significantly between the sexes; ewes had proportionately more muscle in the proximal pelvic limb (8 g/kg) and less in the neck (7 g/kg) and distal thoracic limb (1 g/kg). Despite these small differences in muscle-weight distribution in higher-valued joints in favour of the ewe lambs, each of their joints contained less muscle than those of ram lambs.

In these lambs, reared under commercial conditions in the United Kingdom, there were no signs of gross morphological differences which could result in their disqualification for the Variable Premium of the European Economic Community Sheepmeat Regime. In particular the m. splenius cervicus was a very small proportion of total muscle in both sexes (1·5 and 2·5 g/kg for ewe and ram respectively).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , June 1986 , pp. 343 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler-Hogg, B. W., Francombe, M. A. and Dransfield, E. 1984. Carcass and meat quality of ram and ewe lambs. Anim. Prod. 39: 107–114.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Whelehan, O. P. 1984. Fat partitioning and muscle distribution in Texel and Scottish Blackface rams. Proc. 35th A. Meet. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Reddacliff, K. J., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and Williams, Jean. 1984. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 2. Individual muscles and muscle groups. Anim. Prod. 39: 259–267.Google Scholar
Field, R. A. 1971. Effect of castration on meat quality and quantity. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 849–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. D. M., Burgess, T. D. and Dupchak, K. 1983. Effects of dietary energy intake and sex on carcass tissue and offal growth in sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jury, K. E., Fourie, P. D. and Kirton, A. H. 1977. Growth and development of sheep. IV. Growth of the musculature. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 20: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Clarke, J. N. and Hickey, S. M. 1982. A comparison of the composition and carcass quality of ram, Kelly castrate, Russian castrate, wether and ewe lambs. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 42: 117–118.Google Scholar
Lohse, C. L. 1973. The influence of sex on muscle growth in Merino sheep. Growth 37: 177–187.Google ScholarPubMed
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
MacFie, H. J. H. 1978. Quantifying breed difference in shape. In Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle (ed. Boer, H. De and Martin, J.), pp. 691–704. Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, New Zealand. 1983. Report of the Lean Meat Production Working Party. MAF, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Mason, M. A. and McClelland, T. H. 1980. Breed and sex differences in muscle distribution in equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 30: 125–133.Google Scholar
Walker, D. E. 1950. The influence of sex upon carcass quality of New Zealand fat lamb. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 32: 30–38.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., Fisher, A. V. and Whelehan, O. P. 1986. The effects of a combined androgenic-oestrogenic anabolic agent in steers and bulls. 2. Muscle weight distribution, partition of body fat and carcass value. Anim. Prod. 42: 213–222.Google Scholar
World Association of Veterinary Anatomists. 1968. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. International Committee on Veterinary Anatomical Nomenclature.Google Scholar
Young, O. A. and Bass, J. J. 1984. Effect of castration on bovine muscle composition. Meat Sci. 11: 139–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed