Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:45:09.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mating behaviour and semen characteristics of Finnish Landrace and Scottish Blackface rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. B. Land
R. B. Land
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

Four Finnish Landrace and four Scottish Blackface rams were exposed at 21-day intervals over a period of 19 months to two ovariectomized ewes, which had been induced to show oestrus. The behaviour of each ram was observed for 10 minutes with each ewe. Over the period of the experiment the Finnish Landrace rams consistently mounted the ewes more often than did the Blackfaces and in this respect in particular the reproductive behaviour of the males of these breeds was found to be positively correlated with that of the females of their breed.

Initially, however, the Finnish Landrace rams mated more ewes than did the Blackfaces, but from the time that all rams became sexually active it was impossible to differentiate between the ability of the two groups of rams to mate the ewes presented to them. Semen collections from each ram were attempted by the use of an artificial vagina, again at three-weekly intervals. The motility, density and proportion of live sperm did not differ between the two groups of rams.

The average number of mounts accredited to each ram during the test increased from around 5 in the summer to around 35 in the autumn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , November 1970 , pp. 551 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, M. W. H., Campbell, R. C., Hancock, J. L. and Walton, A. 1954. Semen characteristics and fertility in the bull. J. agric. Sei., Camb. 44: 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P. and Read, J. L. 1967. The performance of Finnish Landrace sheep in Britain. Anim. Prod. 9: 471–476.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. and Ellsmore, J. 1968. The effect of breed, season and competition on mating behaviour of rams. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Hush. 8: 649–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckenzie, F. F. and Berliner, V. 1937. The reproductive capacity of rams. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn., No. 265: 143 pp.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. and Gordon, I. 1967. Seasonal and breed variation in the semen characteristics of rams in Ireland. Ir. vet. J. 21: 222–233.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. 1967. A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Anim. Prod. 9: 177–195.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. 1949. The breeding season of the sheep with particular reference to its modification by artificial means using light. J. agric. Sei., Camb. 39: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar