Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:18:49.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal performance in sheep as affected by breed, crossbreeding and other factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Gerald Wiener  and
Susan Hayter
Gerald Wiener
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Susan Hayter
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

Maternal performance of female sheep of three hill breeds, Scottish Blackface, Cheviot and Welsh Mountain, and the crosses among these breeds has been studied in terms of lifetime production and some of its components. The data are based on 193 ewes, which were given the opportunity of having four annual lamb crops, and their lambs.

There was no significant variation among the breeds and crosses in ewe survival or in the proportion of barren ewes at each lambing. There was significant variation among the breeds and crosses in the number of lambs born per ewe lambing, in lamb survival and in weights of lamb at birth and at weaning. Crossbred ewes (producing crossbred lambs) had more and heavier lambs than expected from the average of the pure breeds contributing to each cross, but the three crossbred types differed in the amount of heterosis shown. Over their lifetime in the flock there were significant breed differences in the total weight of lambs weaned, with crossbred ewes producing about 9% more than the average of the parent breeds involved. The crossbred ewes produced more weight of lambs over their lifetime than pure Cheviot or pure Welsh Mountain ewes, but not as much as pure Scottish Blackface.

Effects of parity of dam and of sex, birth type, and type of rearing of lamb are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 19 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bichard, M. and Cooper, M. McG. 1966. Analysis of production records from a lowland sheep flock. 1. Lamb mortality and growth to 16 weeks. Anim Prod. 8: 401–410.Google Scholar
Botkin, M. P. and Paules, L. 1965. Crossbred ewes compared with ewes of parent breeds for wool and lamb production. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 1111–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgkart, M. and Averdunk, G. 1969. [Results of crossing trials with sheep. Bayer. landw. Jb. 46: 677–690.Google Scholar
Cappon, J. P. 1972. Interim report on Dorset Horn and Dorset Down records. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks, (unpublished mimeograph).Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Read, J. L. and Russell, W. S. 1963. Heterosis in crossbred hill sheep. Anim. Prod. 5:289–299.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. 1966. Inbreeding depression in grazing Blackface sheep. Anim. Prod. 8: 261–266.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H. and Bernard, C. S. 1973. Effects of crossbreeding and certain environmental factors on multiple births, wool production and growth in sheep. Anim. Prod. 16: 147–155.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1961. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Galal, E. S. E., Aboul-Naga, A., Eltawil, E. A. and Khishin, E. S. 1972. Estimates of combining abilities and maternal influence in crosses between Merino, Ossimi and Barki sheep. Anim. Prod. 15: 47–52.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1967. Lifetime performance of the breeding ewe. 4th Rep. {1964–1967) Hill Fmg Res. Org. pp. 51–58. Oliver and Boyd Ltd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Iwan, L. G., Jefferies, B. C. and Turner, H. N. 1971. Estimation of heterosis in Merino x Corriedale crosses with sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 22: 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, R. B., Russell, W. S. and Donald, H. P. 1974. The litter size and fertility of Finnish Landrace and Tasmanian Merino sheep and their reciprocal crosses. Anim. Prod. 18: 265–271.Google Scholar
McGuirk, B. J. 1967. Breeding for lamb production. Wool Technol. Sheep Breed. 14: 73–75.Google Scholar
Purser, A. F. and Young, G. B. 1964. Mortality among twin and single lambs. Anim. Prod. 6: 321–329.Google Scholar
Rae, A. L. 1952. Crossbreeding of sheep. II. Crossbreeding for lamb and mutton production. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 20: 287–299.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M., Everson, D. O. and Terrill, C. E. 1962. Fertility, prolificacy and lamb viability of some pure breeds and their crosses. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 875–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srowell, G. M. and Miller, L. R. 1971a. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. I. Reproductive efficiency in ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 1084–1089.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M. and Miller, L. R. 1971b. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. II. Birth weights and weaning weights of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 1090–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, B. P., Rempel, W. E., Reimer, D., Hanke, H. E., Miller, K. P. and Salmela, A. B. 1967. Evaluation of breeds of sheep on the basis of crossbred lamb performance. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. N. 1969. Genetic improvement of reproduction rate in sheep. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 37: 545–563.Google Scholar
Wiener, Gerald 1967. A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Anim. Prod. 9: 177–195.Google Scholar
Wiener, Gerald and Hayter, Susan. 1974. Body size and conformation in sheep from birth to maturity as affected by breed, crossbreeding, maternal and other factors. Anim. Prod. 19: 47–65.Google Scholar