Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:30:51.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maize silage for milk production: The influence of concentrate supplementation and the effect of adding urea or ammonia before feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. Aston ,
S. R. Daley  and
J. C. Tayler
K. Aston
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
S. R. Daley
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
J. C. Tayler
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

1. Thirty lactating British Friesian heifers and cows were individually given maize silage ad libitum containing 331 g dry matter/kg, 13 g nitrogen and 11·2 MJ of metabolizable energy per kg dry matter. Urea or aqueous ammonia was mixed in at the time of feeding to give 7·0 g nitrogen per kg silage dry matter. Urea-treated silage was given with concentrates at a high (mean 6·6 kg dry matter/day: treatment HU) or a low (mean 3·3 kg:treatment LU) level of feeding; the lower level only was given with ammonia-treated silage (treatment LA).

2. The addition of ammonia raised silage pH values from 3·9 to 4·4. Silage dry-matter intakes in lactation weeks 7 to 22 for treatments HU, LU and LA were 8·8, 11·1 and 10·7 kg/day.

3. Digestible organic matter content in the dry matter of the diets measured in vivo was not significantly affected by treatment. However, digestible organic matter intakes were significantly greater for treatment HU than for LU in weeks 7 to 10, and for LU than for LA in weeks 11 to 22.

4. The yields of milk and the contents of protein, lactose and energy did not differ between treatments. The milk yields for treatments HU, LU and LA in weeks 7 to 22 were 20·2,19·2, 18·8 kg/day respectively. Fat content of milk was significantly depressed with the HU treatment for heifers in weeks 7 to 10. The live-weight changes of the cows in weeks 7 to 22 for treatments HU, LU and LA were +0·10, −0·07 and −0·37 kg/day; the live-weight loss by cows given treatment LA was significantly greater than for LU. The live-weight change of the heifers was not affected by treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 163 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. 1976. Factors influencing voluntary food intake in cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 287–305. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1970. Feeding over the lactation cycle. In Dairy Nutrition, pp. 47–61. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Cottrill, B. R., Osbourn, D. F., Wilkinson, J. M. and Richmond, P. J. 1976. The effect of dietary pH and nitrogen supplementation on the intake and utilization of maize silage by young calves. Anim. Prod. 22: 154–155 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Huber, J. T., Lichtenwalner, R. E. and Henderson, H. E. 1974. Direct addition of ammonia solutions to corn silage fed to dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 57: 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, D. S., Wilkins, R. J. and Raymond, W. F. 1970. The voluntary intake by sheep and cattle of silages differing in free-acid content. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75: 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Moe, P. W., Tyrrell, H. F. and Flatt, W. P. 1971. Energetics of body tissue mobilization. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 548–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, J. M., Dew, Sally M., Manston, R. and Faulks, Margaret. 1970. The use of a metabolic profile test in dairy herds. Vet. Rec. 87: 150–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phipps, R. H. and Cramp, D. G. 1976. The supplementation of maize silage for an autumn-calving dairy herd. Anim. Prod. 23: 191–196.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T. and Robb, J. 1971. Relationships of body composition to energy intake and energetic efficiency. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 553–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R. and Smith, R. H. 1977. Calculation of the N-requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. In Proc. 2nd int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Flevohov. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Publ. No. 22, pp. 126–129.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1976a. Milk production from diets of silage and dried forage. 1. Effects of methods of processing dried grass and of including barley in the supplementation of grass silage given ad libitum. Anim. Prod. 23: 197–209.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1976b. Milk production from diets of silage and dried forage. 2. Effect of ensiling ryegrass cut at two levels of digestibility and given ad libitum with supplements of dried grass pellets. Anim. Prod. 23: 211–221.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Wilkins, R. J. 1976. Conserved forage—complement or competitor t o concentrates. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 343–364. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1974. The voluntary intake of maize silage treated with ammonia. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 3: 102–103 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Thomas, C. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1975. The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production. 3. Nitrogen and acidity as factors affecting the nutritive value of ensiled maize. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 85: 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernli, C. 1971. Nutritional studies on feed supplements for grass silage. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Fenlon, J. S., Cook, J. E. and Wilson, R. F. 1978. A further analysis of relationships between silage composition and voluntary intake by sheep. In Proc. 5th Silage Conf., Hannah Res. lnst., Ayr, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. and Harris, C. E. 1971. The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. I. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar