Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:27:09.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lysine requirements of pigs from 2 to 7 kg live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. E. Auldist ,
F. L. Stevenson ,
M. G. Kerr ,
P. Eason  and
R. H. King
D. E. Auldist
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
F. L. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
M. G. Kerr
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
P. Eason
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
R. H. King
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-two male pigs were used to investigate the effects of nine levels of dietary lysine ranging from 0·41 to 1·30 g lysine per MJ gross energy (GE) on the performance of pigs weaned at 1 to 2 days of age and growing between 2 and 7 kg live weight. The nine dietary lysine treatments, which contained similar levels of GE and balance of essential amino acids, were offered to the pigs at a common feeding level of 2·0 MJ GE per kg metabolic live weight (M075) per day. Growth performance and protein deposition rates increased linearly with increasing dietary lysine content up to about 0·97 g lysine per MJ GE and remained relatively constant thereafter. The response of protein deposition (PD, g/day) in the whole body of pigs to dietary lysine (L, g lysine per MJ GE) was described by three models. The respective regression equation for the quadratic function was PD = -14·23 + 87·66 L – 36·00 L2 and maximum protein deposition occurred at 1·22 g lysine per MJ GE. The rectilinear model, which had an ascending linear phase (PD = 1·49 + 40·10 L, R2 = 0·98, P < 0·001) and a horizontal component representing a mean protein deposition rate of 39·7g/day revealed that maximum protein deposition occurred at 0·95g lysine per MJ GE. Finally, application of the asymptotic model also revealed a highly significant equation: PD = 43·40 — 79·99 × 0·07111, R2 = 0·94, P < 0·001; which indicates a dietary requirement of 1·07 g lysine per MJ GE assuming that the dietary requirement was estimated at 0·90 of the asymptote maximal value. The results indicate that the dietary lysine requirement for pigs during the first 3 weeks of life appears to have changed little over the past 20 years despite substantial changes in genotype.

Keywords

lysinepigsprotein
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , December 1997 , pp. 501 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official methods of analysis, 12th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Bikker, P. 1994. Protein and lipid accretion in body components of growing pigs. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. 1988. Nutritional constraints to lean tissue accretion in farm animals. Nutrition Research Reviews 1: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983. The effects of energy intake and dietary protein on nitrogen retention, growth performance, body composition and some aspects of energy metabolism of young pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Taverner, M. R. 1988. Genotype and sex effects on the relationship between energy intake and protein deposition in growing pigs. Journal ofAnimal Science 66: 676–686.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curie, D. M. 1984. Effect of feeding level and dietary protein content on the growth, body composition and rate of protein deposition in pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg. Animal Production 38: 233–240.Google Scholar
Chung, T. K. and Baker, D. H. 1992. Ideal amino acid pattern for 10-kilogram pigs. Journal of Animal Science 20: 3102–3111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunshea, F. R., King, R. H. and Campbell, R. G. 1993. Interrelationships between dietary protein and ractopamine on protein and lipid deposition in finishing gilts. Journal of Animal Science 71:2931–2941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, R. F., Vander Noot, G. W., Gilbreath, R. L. and Fisher, H. 1971. Effect of dietary protein level on composition changes in sow colostrum and milk. Journal of Animal Science 32:1128–1137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C., Morris, T. R. and Jennings, R. C. 1973. A model for the description and prediction of the response of laying hens to amino acid intake. British Poultry Science 14: 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R. W. 1974. Efficiency of food conversion and body composition of the preruminant lamb and young pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32:113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, K. J., Eddie, S. M. and Stevenson, W. G. 1980. Energy and protein nutrition of early-weaned pigs. 1. Effect of energy intake and energy: protein on growth, efficiency and nitrogen utilisation of pigs between 8-32d. British Journal of Nutrition 43: 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient requirements of swine, 9th edition. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Newport, M. J. 1979. Artificial rearing of pigs. Effect of dietary protein level on performance, nitrogen retention and carcass composition. British Journal of Nutrition 41: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schinckel, A. P., Preckel, P. V. and Einstein, M. E. 1996. Prediction of daily protein accretion rates of pigs from estimates of fat-free lean gain between 20 and 120 kilograms live weight. Journal of Animal Science 74:498–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical methods, 6th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, USA.Google Scholar
Spackman, D. W., Stein, W. H. and Moore, S. 1958. Automatic recording apparatus for use in chromatography of amino acids. Analytical Chemistry 30:1190–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture. 1987. Feeding standards for Australian livestock; pigs. CSIRO Publications, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Elsley, F. W. H. 1976. Practical pig nutrition. Farming Press Limited, Ipswich, UK.Google Scholar
Williams, I. H. 1976. Nutrition of the young pig in relation to body composition. Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Williams, I. H. 1995. Sow's milk as a major nutrient source before weaning. In Manipulating pig production V (ed. Hennessy, D. P. and Cranwell, P. D.), pp. 107–111. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar