Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:47:46.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

H. N. Kadarmideen ,
R. Thompson  and
G. Simm
H. N. Kadarmideen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK IACR, Rothamsted Experiment Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
G. Simm
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
Get access

Abstract

This study provides estimates of genetic parameters for various diseases, fertility and 305-day milk production traits in dairy cattle using data from a UK national milk recording scheme. The data set consisted of 63891 multiple lactation records on diseases (mastitis, lameness, milk fever, ketosis and tetany), fertility traits (calving interval, conception to first service, number of services for a conception, and number of days to first service), dystocia and 305-day milk, fat and protein yield. All traits were analysed by multi-trait repeatability linear animal models (LM). Binary diseases and fertility traits were further analysed by threshold sire models (TM). Both LM and TM analyses were based on the generalized linear mixed model framework. The LM included herd-year-season of calving (HYS), age at calving and parity as fixed effects and genetic, permanent environmental and residual effects as random. The TM analyses included the same effects as for LM, but HYS effects were treated as random to avoid convergence problems when HYS sub-classes had 0 or 100% incidence. Because HYS effects were treated as random, herd effects were fitted as fixed effects to account for effect of herds in the data. The LM estimates of heritability ranged from 0•389 to 0•399 for 305-day milk production traits, 0•010 to 0•029 for fertility traits and 0•004 to 0•038 for diseases. The LM estimates of repeatability ranged from 0•556 to 0•586 for 305-day milk production traits, 0•029 to 0•086 for fertility traits and 0•004 to 0•100 for diseases. The TM estimates of heritabilities and repeatabilities were greater than LM estimates for binary traits and were in the range 0•012 to 0•126 and 0•013 to 0•168, respectively. Genetic correlations between milk production traits and fertility and diseases were all unfavorable: they ranged from 0•07 to 0•37 for milk production and diseases, 0•31 to 0•54 for milk production and poor fertility and 0•06 to 0•41 for diseases and poor fertility. These results show that future selection programmes should include disease and fertility for genetic improvement of health and reproduction and for sustained economic growth in the dairy cattle industry.

Keywords

dairy cattlediseasesfertilitygenetic parametersthreshold models
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 411 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boettcher, P. J., Dekkers, J. C. M., Warnick, L. D. and Wells, S. J. 1998. Genetic analysis of clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1148—1156.Google Scholar
Boettcher, P. J., Jairath, L. K. and Dekkers, J. C. M. 1999. Comparison of methods for genetic evaluation of sires for survival of their daughters in the first three lactations. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 1034—1044.Google Scholar
Boichard, D. and Manfredi, E. 1994. Genetic analysis of conception rate in French Holstein cattle. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 44: 138—145.Google Scholar
Dematawewa, C. M. B. and Berger, P. J. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility and survival in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2700—2709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianola, D. 1980. Genetic evaluation of animals for traits with categorical responses. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1272—1276.Google Scholar
Gianola, D. 1982. Theory and analysis of threshold characters. Journal of Animal Science 56: 1079—1096.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. and Thompson, R. 1998. ASREML user’s manual. New South Wales Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. F., Cue, R. I. and Monardes, H. G. 1992. Estimates of repeatability of reproductive traits in Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1701—1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J., Lugt, A. W. van der, Werf, J. H. J. van der and Ouweltjes, W. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 40: 225—232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossaibati, M. A. and Esslemont, R. J. 1995. DAISY, wastage in dairy herds. Report no. 4. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Lindhe, B. and Philipsson, J. 1998. Genetic correlations between production with disease resistance and fertility in dairy cattle and consequences for total merit selection. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 48: 216—221.Google Scholar
Lund, M. S., Jensen, J. and Petersen, P. H. 1999. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell production deviance, and protein yield in dairy cattle using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 1045—1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, D. T., Freeman, A. E. and Kuck, A. L. 1991. Genetics of health traits. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1092—1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuirk, B. J., Going, I. and Gilmour, A. R. 1998. The genetic evaluation of beef sires used for crossing with dairy cows in the UK. 2. Genetic parameters and sire merit predictions for calving survey traits. Animal Science 66: 47—54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Esslemont, R. J., Thompson, R., Veerkamp, R. F., Kossaibati, M. A. and Simm, G. 1998. Estimation of genetic parameters using health, fertility and production data from a management recording system for dairy cattle. Animal Science 66: 577—584.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Nielsen, B. L., Veerkamp, R. F. and Simm, G. 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57: 193—201.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Veerkamp, R. F., Thompson, R., Hill., and, W. G. Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65: 353—360.Google Scholar
Rekaya, R., Rodriguez-Zas, S. L., Gianola, D. and Schook, G. E. 1998. Test day models for longitudinal binary responses: an application to mastitis in Holsteins. Proceedings of the 49th meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. and Lerner, I. M. 1949. The heritability of all-or-none traits: liability of poultry. Genetics 34: 395—411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simianer, H., Sobu, H. and Schaeffer, L. R. 1991. Estimated genetic correlations between disease and yield traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 4358—4365.Google Scholar
Stott, A. W., Veerkamp, R. F. and Wassell, T. R. 1999. The economics of fertility in the dairy herd. Animal Science 68: 49—57.Google Scholar
Uribe, H. A., Kennedy, B. W., Martin, S. W. and Kelton, D. F. 1995. Genetic parameters of common health disorders of Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 421—430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandorp, T. E., Dekkers, J. C. M., Martin, S. W. and Noordhuizen, J. P. T. M. 1998. Genetic parameters of health disorders, and relationships with 305-day milk yield and conformation traits of registered Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2264—2270.Google Scholar
Van Tassell, C. P., Van Vleck, L. D. and Gregory, K. E. 1999. Bayesian analysis of twinning and ovulation rates using multiple-trait threshold model and Gibbs sampling. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2048—2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, J. I. and Ron, M. 1992. Genetic analysis of fertility traits in Israeli Holsteins by linear and threshold models. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2541—2548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed