Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:37:51.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increasing food intake in late gestation improved sow condition throughout lactation but did not affect piglet viability or growth rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

H. M. Miller ,
G. R. Foxcroft  and
F. X. Aherne
H. M. Miller
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Sciences, LIBA, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
G. R. Foxcroft
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
F. X. Aherne
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Increasing sow food intake in late gestation prevents loss of sow fatness prior to farrowing. However, this may result in reduced food intake and greater overall fat loss during lactation and has also been associated with increased incidence of agalactia. In this experiment 78 Camborough sows (parities 1 to 3) were given food at one of two levels: either 1·15 × maintenance energy (normal-N sows, 2·3 (s.e. 0·03) kg/day) or 2·00 × maintenance energy (high-H sows, 3·9 (s.e. 0·04) kg/day) from day 100 of gestation until farrowing. Lactation food intake, changes in sow live weight and backfat thickness and piglet growth rates were then measured. Diet digestibility in early lactation was measured using a chromium III oxide marker in the food. There was no change in backfat thickness in late gestation in H sows (0·2 (s.e. 0·25) mm), whereas N sows lost backfat during this period (1·6 (s.e. 0·23) mm, P <; 0·001). There was no difference in lactation food intake between the two groups (6·5 (s.e. 0·13) kg/day) and differences in backfat thickness at parturition were maintained through to weaning. H sows did not show increased incidence of agalactia compared with N sows. There was no difference in diet digestibility between the two treatment groups. Food intake level in late gestation did not affect piglet birth weights, growth rates or mortality. It is concluded that the main benefit of increasing sow food intake in late gestation was to reduce sow backfat loss during the reproductive cycle.

Keywords

food intakelactationpregnancysows
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , August 2000 , pp. 141 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A. 1990. Nutritional strategies to optimize reproduction in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 40: 67–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Cromwell, G. L., Hall, D. D., Clawson, A. J., Combs, G. E., Knabe, D. A., Maxwell, C. V., Noland, P. R., Orr, D. E. J. and Prince, T. J. 1989. Effects of additional feed during late gestation on reproductive performance of sows: a cooperative study. Journal of Animal Science 67: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, C. M., Stickland, N. C. and Fletcher, J. M. 1994. The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fibre number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. Journal of Animal Science 72: 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elsley, F. W. H., Bathurst, E. V. J., Bracewell, A. G., Cunningham, J. M. M., Dent, J. B., Dodsworth, T. L., MacPherson, R. M. and Walker, N. 1971. The effect of pattern of food intake in pregnancy upon sow productivity. Animal Production 13: 257–270.Google Scholar
Farmer, C., Robert, S. and Matte, J. J. 1996. Lactation performance of sows fed a bulky diet during gestation and receiving growth hormone-releasing factor during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1298–1306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenton T. W. and Fenton, M. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxcroft, G. R., Aherne, F. X., Clowes, E. C., Miller, H. M. and Zak, L. 1995. Sow fertility: the role of suckling inhibition and metabolic status. In Animal science research and development-moving towards a new century (ed. Ivan, M.), pp. 377–393. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Hillyer, G. M. and Phillips, P. 1980. The effect of increasing food level to sows and gilts in late pregnancy on subsequent litter size, litter weight and maternal body-weight change. Animal Production 30: 469 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Koketsu, Y. 1994. Influence of feed intake and other factors on the lactational and postweaning reproductive performance of sows. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Matte, J. J., Robert, S., Girard, C. L., Farmer, C. and Martineau, G. P. 1994. Effect of bulky diets based on wheat bran or oat hulls on reproductive performance of sows during their first two parities. Journal of Animal Science 72: 1754–1760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matzat, P. D., Hogberg, M. G., Fogwell, R. L. and Miller, E. R. 1990. Relationship between environmental and management factors and lactating sow intake. Michigan State University report of swine research 1990, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
Mullan, B. P. and Williams, I. H. 1989. The effect of body reserves at farrowing on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. Animal Production 48: 449–457.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient requirements of swine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Neil, M. 1996. Ad libitum lactation feeding of sows introduced immediately before, at, or after farrowing. Animal Science 63: 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J., Dourmad, J. Y. and Etienne, M. 1990. Energy utilisation in pregnant and lactating sows: modelling of energy requirements. Journal of Animal Science 68: 562–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Grady, J.F., Lynch, P.B. and Kearney, P. A. 1985. Voluntary feed intake by lactating sows. Livestock Production Science 12: 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, R. L. 1992. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California, USA.Google Scholar
Persson, A., Pedersen, A. E., Göransson, L. and Kuhl, W. 1989. A long term study on the health status and performance of sows on different feed allowances during late pregnancy. I. Clinical observations with special reference to agalactia post partum . Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 30: 9–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pharazyn, A., Hartog, L. A. den, Foxcroft, G. R. and Aherne, F. X. 1991. Dietary energy and protein intake, plasma progesterone and embryo survival in early pregnancy in the gilt. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 949–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, W. G., Yen, J. T., Maurer, R. R. and Christenson, R. K. 1981. Effect of doubling daily energy intake during the last two weeks of pregnancy on pig birth weight, survival and weaning weight. Journal of Animal Science 52: 535–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon-Legagneur, E. and Rerat, A. 1962. Nutrition of the sow during pregnancy. In Nutrition of pigs and poultry (ed. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.), pp. 207–223. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Sterling, L. G. and Cline, T. R. 1986. The effect of energy level in late gestation and lactation on the sow and litter: growth and reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science 63: (suppl. 1) 115 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Tokach, M. D. 1991. Influence of blood metabolites and metabolic hormones on milk production and reproduction in the primiparous sow. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1993. The science and practice of pig production. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Zak, L. J., Cosgrove, J. R., Aherne, F. X. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1997. Pattern of feed intake and endocrine changes differentially affect postweaning fertility in primiparous lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 75: 208–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed