Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nwwvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-13T19:26:03.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. W. Nicholas  and
C. Smith
F. W. Nicholas
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
C. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0908, USA
Get access

Abstract

Possibilities for increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle through embryo transfer and embryo splitting are examined, using the multiple ovulation and embryo transfer systems previously proposed. These involve embryo transfer from 1-year-old females (juvenile scheme, generation interval 1·8 years) and from females after 1 lactation (adult scheme, generation interval 3·7 years), with use of males at similar ages. Though selection is less accurate than in conventional progeny testing, the annual rate of genetic improvement can be increased, and even doubled. If the number of transfers is restricted andm the inbreeding rate is limiting, the adult scheme for both sexes is preferred. A scheme with 1 024 transfers per year and 512 females milk-recorded per year will sustain a rate of genetic improvement some 30% above that possible by a conventional national progeny-testing programme. Because of the relatively small number of animals involved, it is argued that greater control over recording, breeding and selection should be possible, leading to a larger proportion of the possible genetic gains being realized in practice. Other advantages, and disadvantages of these systems, and their integration in dairy cattle improvement are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 341 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Burrows, P. M. 1972. Expected selection differentials for directional selection. Biometrics 28: 1091–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. 1974. Variability of response to selection in genetic experiments. Biometrics 30: 363–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinks, C. J. M. 1978. The use of centralised breeding schemes in dairy cattle improvement. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 46: 291–297.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Nancy J. and Dibernardino, Marie A. 1980. Developmental potential of somatic nuclei transplanted into meiotic oocytes of Rana pipiens. Science, Wash., DC. 209: 517–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindhé, B. 1968. Model simulation of Ai-breeding within a dual purpose breed of cattle. Ada. Agric. scand. 18: 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, B. T. and Cassell, B. G. 1981. Effects of embryo transfer on genetic change in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 64: 2484–2492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, F. W. 1979. The genetic implications of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in small dairy herds. Proc. Conf. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Harrogate, England.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. 1975. Selection of dairy bulls on half-sister records. Anim. Prod. 20: 1–10.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. 1957. Optimum group size in progeny testing and family selection. Biometrics 13: 442–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. 1961. Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genet. Res. 2: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. and Rendel, J. M. 1950. The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle. J. Genet. 50: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidel, G. E. Jr 1980. Potential applications of cloning in animal industry. Proc. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. Artificial Insemination, Madrid, pp. 363–370.Google Scholar
Skjervold, H. and Langholtz, H. J. 1964. Factors affecting the optimum structure of Al-breeding in dairy cattle. Z. Tierzücht. ZüchtBiol. 80: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D. 1977. Theoretical and actual genetic progress in dairy cattle. In Proc. int. Conf. Quantitative Genetics (ed. Pollak, E.Kempthorne, O. and Bailey, T. B. Jr), pp. 543–568. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D. 1981. Potential genetic impact of artificial insemination, sex selection, embryo transfer, cloning and selfing in dairy cattle. In New Technologies in Animal Breeding (ed. Brackett, B. G., Seidel, G. E. Jr and Seidel, S. M.), pp. 221–242. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Willadsen, S. M. 1979. A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins. Nature, Lond. 277: 298–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed