No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Growth of twin cattle fed in proportion to body weight
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Abstract
Twenty-two pairs of female Friesian twin calvxs, fed a standard pelleted diet with an ME value of 9·3 MJ 'kg, were split between the following nutritional treatments: (a)ad libitum (b) a weekly amount equal to 24% of body weight or (c) equal to 20% of body weight. Each proportionally-fed animal eventually reached a break-point when the amount of food it was offered exceeded its intake capacity.
For the ‘24%’ and ‘20%’ regimes respectively, break-points occurred at a mean age of 40 and 48 weeks and at a mean body weight of 222 and 258 kg. Surprisingly, the mean body weights at these ages on the ad libitum regime were virtually the same (223 and 265 kg). Thus growth up to break-point was, on average, just as fast for proportional feeding as for ad libitum.
In general, growth up to break-point was significantly slower than the exponential rate expected from a simple linear model. Nevertheless, animals fed at the 20% level grew almost exponentially beyond 6 months of age, and the normally expected decline in the food efficiency ratio was delayed.
The hypothesis being tested was that a proportional feeding system, while in operation, would ensure highly efficient growth and that the break-point could be used as a self-determined optimal slaughter point for each individual. On the evidence obtained, further investigation would be worthwhile, especially at proportional feeding levels giving break-points beyond 1 year of age.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983
References
REFERENCES
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. and Nelder, J. A. 1978. The GLIM System, Release 3, Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1968. The effect of dietary energy supply on growth. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 329–344. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. and Pullar, J. D. 1963. Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep. Anim. Prod. 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
Ministry or Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Monteiro, L. S. 1975. Food efficiency in relation to estimated growth of body components in cattle. Anim. Prod. 20: 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1975a. The animal growth phase plane. J. theor. Biol. 55: 371–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parks, J. R. 1975b. A theory of animal weight response to controlled feeding J. theor. Biol. 55: 381–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, St. C. S. 1966. Genetic studies on twin cattle. Proc. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. 1980a. Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth. Anim. Prod. 30: 161–165.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. 1980b. Genetically standardized growth equations. Anim. Prod. 30: 167–175.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S., Turner, H. G. and Young, G. B. 1981. Genetic control of equilibrium maintenance efficiency in cattle. Anim. Prod. 33: 179–194.Google Scholar
Taylor, ST. C. S. and Young, G. B. 1966. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle with liveweight and food intake controlled J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. and Young, G. B. 1968. Equilibrium weight in relation to food intake and genotype in twin cattle. Anim. Prod. 10: 393–412.Google Scholar