Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:48:49.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetically standardized growth equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

The genetic size-scaling rules recently proposed by the author are used to derive genetically standardized growth equations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. 1968. The effect of the dietary energy supply on growth. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 329344. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Huggett, A. St G. and Widdas, W. F. 1951. The relationship between mammalian foetal weight and conception age. J. Physiol., Lond. 114: 306317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleiber, M. 1961. The Fire of Life. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. 1964. Comparative Nutrition of Man and Domestic Animals. Vol. II. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Monteiro, L. S. 1975. Food efficiency in relation to estimated growth of body components in cattle. Anim. Prod. 20: 315335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1970. Growth curves and the physiology of growth. I. Animals. II. Effects of dietary energy. III. Effects of dietary protein. Am. J. Physiol. 219: 833843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1975. A theory of animal weight response to controlled feeding. J. theor. Biol. 55: 381391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. S. 1975. The growth of Ayrshire cattle: an analysis of linear body measurements. Anim. Prod. 21: 217226.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1965. A relation between mature weight and time taken to mature in mammals. Anim. Prod. 7: 203220.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1969. Growth rate curves. Rep. Anim. Breed. Res. Orgn, p. 1218.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1970. Models of maintenance requirements in livestock. In The Use of Models in Agricultural and Biological Research (ed. Jones, J. G. W.), pp. 107117. Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1973. Genetic differences in milk production in relation to mature body weight. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 1526.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980a. Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth. Anim. Prod. 30: 161165.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980b. Live-weight growth from embryo to adult in domesticated mammals. Anim. Prod. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and YOUNG, G. B. 1966. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle with live weight and food intake controlled. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 6785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Young, G. B. 1968. Equilibrium weight in relation to food intake and genotype in twin cattle. Anim. Prod. 10: 393412.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Smith, J. S., Crabtree, R. M. and Mollison, G. S. 1976. Prediction of energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. 2. Hereford × British Friesian steers given dried grass or barley. Anim. Prod. 23: 329340.Google Scholar
Weinbach, A. P. 1951. The human growth curve. I. Prenatal growth. Growth 5: 217233.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. and Hendricks, W. A. 1953. Energy requirements of beef calves for maintenance and growth. U.S. Dep. Agric, Tech. Bull. No. 1071.Google Scholar