Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:52:28.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic variances, trends and mode of inheritance for hip and elbow dysplasia in Finnish dog populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

K. Mäki1 ,
A. F. Groen ,
A.-E. Liinamo  and
M. Ojala
K. Mäki1*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
A. F. Groen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
A.-E. Liinamo
Affiliation:
Farm Animal Industrial Platform, Benedendorpsweg 98, 6862 WL Oosterbeek, The Netherlands
M. Ojala
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
*
E-mail:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess genetic variances, trends and mode of inheritance for hip and elbow dysplasia in Finnish dog populations. The influence of time-dependent fixed effects in the model when estimating the genetic trends was also studied. Official hip and elbow dysplasia screening records of 42 421 dogs from seven breeds were analysed with REML. To investigate the mode of inheritance of hip and elbow dysplasia, trait distributions, genetic variances and regressions of offspring phenotypes on parental predicted breeding values were studied separately in males and in females. Genetic trends for hip dysplasia between the years 1983 and 1998 were favourable only in the Rottweiler. In elbow dysplasia, the trends were favourable after the year 1992 in all the four breeds studied but the overall changes were small. The reason for this seemed to be negligible selection pressure against these traits. Time-dependent fixed effects in the model had an influence on the estimated genetic trends, resulting either in a more negative or more positive genetic trend compared with the model from which the time-dependent effects were removed. Mitochondrial or sex-linked inheritance did not seem likely in the expression of hip and elbow dysplasia in the populations studied. Regression coefficients of offspring phenotypes on estimated parental breeding values were approximately equal to their expected value in a situation with equal parental contribution. Furthermore, the phenotypic frequency distributions of hip and elbow dysplasia grades were similar among males and females in each breed studied. No indication of major genes was found in the offspring frequency distributions within individual sires. According to these Finnish data, mode of inheritance for both hip and elbow dysplasia is polygenic (quantitative) with equal expression of the genes from both parents, although the estimates of heritability for hip dysplasia in the Rough Collie and for elbow dysplasia in the German Shepherd and the Golden Retriever were somewhat different in males compared with females.

Keywords

dogsdysplasiagenetic parametersinheritance
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 2002 , pp. 197 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beuing, R., Mues, Ch., Tellhelm, B. and Erhardt, G. 2000. Prevalence and inheritance of canine elbow dysplasia in German Rottweiler. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 117: 375–383.Google Scholar
Brass, W. 1989. Hip dysplasia in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice 30: 166–170.Google Scholar
Distl, O., Grussler, W., Schwarz, J. and Kräusslich, H. 1991. [Analysis of environmental and genetic influences on the frequency of hip dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs. ] Journal of Veterinary Medicine 38: 460–471.Google Scholar
Everts, R. E. 2000. Molecular genetic studies in the dog; application to fragmented coronoid process (FCP) in the Labrador Retriever. Ph. D. thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Groeneveld, E. 1990. PEST user’s manual. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Germany.Google Scholar
Grøndalen, J. and Lingaas, F. 1991. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs: a genetic investigation. Journal of Small Animal Practice 32: 460–464.Google Scholar
Guthrie, S. and Pidduck, H. G. 1990. Heritability of elbow osteochondrosis within a closed population of dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice 31: 93–96.Google Scholar
Hedhammar, Å., Olsson, S.-E., Andersson, S.-Å., Persson, L., Pettersson, L., Olausson, A. and Sundgren, P.-E. 1979. Canine hip dysplasia: study of heritability in 401 litters of German Shepherd dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 174: 1012–1064.Google Scholar
Hedhammar|Å., Swenson, L. and Egenvall, A. 1999. Elbow arthrosis and hip dysplasia in Swedish dogs as reflected by screening programmes and insurance data. European Journal of Companion Animal Practice 9: 119–121.Google Scholar
Janss, L. L. G. and Brascamp, E. W. 1998. Prediction of elbow dysplasia in dogs by breeding values of relatives. Proceedings of the sixth world congress of genetics applied to livestock production, Armidale, vol. 25, pp. 621–624.Google Scholar
Leighton, E. A. 1997. Genetics of canine hip dysplasia. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210: 1474–1479.Google Scholar
Leighton, E. A., Linn, J. M., Willham, R. L. and Castleberry, M. W. 1977. A genetic study of canine hip dysplasia. American Journal of Veterinary Research 38: 241–244.Google Scholar
Leppänen, M., Mäki, K., Juga, J. and Saloniemi, H. 2000. Estimation of heritability for hip dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs in Finland. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 117: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, M. and Saloniemi, H. 1999. Screening and controlling canine hip dysplasia in Finland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 42: 121–131.Google Scholar
LeRoy, P. and Elsen, J. M. 1992. Simple test statistics for major gene detection: a numerical comparison. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 635–644.Google Scholar
Lingaas, F. and Klemetsdal, G. 1990. Breeding values and genetic trend for hip dysplasia in the Norwegian Golden Retriever population. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 107: 437–443.Google Scholar
Mäki, K., Groen, A. F., Liinamo, A.-E. and Ojala, M. 2001. Population structure, inbreeding trend and their association with hip and elbow dysplasia in dogs. Animal Science 73: 217–228.Google Scholar
Mäki, K., Liinamo, A.-E. and Ojala, M. 2000. Estimates of genetic parameters for hip and elbow dysplasia in Finnish Rottweilers. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1141–1148.Google Scholar
Neumaier, A. and Groeneveld, E. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30: 3–26.Google Scholar
Ohlerth, S., Lang, J., Busato, A. and Gaillard, G. 2001. Estimation of genetic population variables for six radiographic criteria of hip dysplasia in a colony of Labrador Retrievers. American Journal of Veterinary Research 62: 846–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, A. L., Keller, G. G., Vogt, D. W., Ellersieck, M. R. and Corley, E. A. 2000. Effect of dam and sire qualitative hip conformation scores on progeny hip conformation. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217: 675–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swenson, L., Audell, L. and Hedhammar, Å. 1997a. Prevalence and inheritance of and selection for elbow arthrosis in Bernese Mountain Dogs and Rottweilers in Sweden and benefit: cost analysis of a screening and control program. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swenson, L., Audell, L. and Hedhammar, Å. 1997b. Prevalence and inheritance of and selection for hip dysplasia in seven breeds of dogs in Sweden and benefit: cost analysis of a screening and control program. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210: 207–214.Google Scholar
Todhunter, R. J., Acland, G. M., Olivier, M., Williams, A. J., Vernier-Singer, M., Burton-Wurster, N., Farese, J. P., Grohn, Y. T., Gilbert, R. O., Dykes, N. L. and Lust, G. 1999. An outcrossed canine pedigree for linkage analysis of hip dysplasia. The Journal of Heredity 90: 83–92.Google Scholar
Ubbink, G. J., Hazewinkel, H. A. W., Broek, J. van de and Rothuizen, J. 1999. Familial clustering and risk analysis for fragmented coronoid process and elbow joint incongruity in Bernese Mountain Dogs in The Netherlands. American Journal of Veterinary Research 60: 1082–1087.Google Scholar
Vilva, V. 1997. Data preparation system WSYS-L. http: // www. animal. helsinki. fi/wsysl/wsysl. html.Google Scholar
Wood, J. L. N., Lakhani, K. H. and Dennis, R. 2000a. Heritability of canine hip-dysplasia score, and its components in Gordon Setters. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 46: 87–97.Google Scholar
Wood, J. L. N., Lakhani, K. H. and Dennis, R. 2000b. Heritability and epidemiology of canine hip-dysplasia score in Flat-Coated Retrievers and Newfoundlands in the United Kingdom. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 46: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed