Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:46:43.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters of British Large White bacon pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1962

C. Smith ,
J. W. B. King  and
N. Gilbert
N. Gilbert
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9 John Innes Institute, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts
Get access

Extract

Estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations among 35 measurements and scores of British Large White bacon pigs are reported. The data came from pigs tested at the five National Progeny Testing Stations during the period autumn 1957 to spring 1959, and comprised full records on 1936 pigs from 200 sires. Independent analyses were carried out for each sex, and adjustments were made to the data for differences among stations, six-monthly periods and weight at slaughter.

Genetic parameters were estimated from sire components of variation and covariation obtained by conventional heirarchical analyses of variance and covariance. Estimates of the heritabilities and their standard errors are given in Table 2, and of genetic and phenotypic correlations in Table 3. These estimates, which agree in general with other estimates in the literature,, indicate that a large part of the variation and covariation is of genetic origin and that carcass traits, growth rate and food conversion efficiency are amenable to change by selection. Moreover, no serious antagonisms were found to exist with regard to improvement by selection.

An attempt has been made to summarise the correlation matrix pattern among 24 of the more important traits by using a principal component analysis. The first two principal components account for a disproportionate fraction of the correlation pattern especially of the genetic correlation matrix. Two principal components are given for each trait; the first may be associated with measurements of fat depth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 1962 , pp. 128 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Broderick, T., 1960. Genetic aspects of pedigree Irish Large White pigs. J. Dep. Agric. (Dublin), 56: 3.Google Scholar
2Clausen, H. & Nortoft Thomsen, R., 1961. [49th report on comparative tests with pigs from state-recognised breeding centres, 1959-60.] 327. Beretning fra Forsogslaboratoriet, Kebenhavn. [In Danish].Google Scholar
3Dickerson, G. E., 1947. Composition of hog carcasses as influenced by heritable differences in rate and economy of gain. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. No. 354.Google Scholar
4Fredeen, H. T., 1953. Genetic aspects of Canadian bacon production. Dep. Agric. Ottawa, Canada, Pub. No. 889, 38 pp.Google Scholar
5Fredeen, H. T. & Jonsson, P., 1957. Genetic variance and covariance in Danish Landrace swine as evaluated under a system of individual feeding of progeny test groups. Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol, 70: 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Johansson, I., and Korkman, N., 1950. A study of the variation in production traits of bacon pigs. Ada. Agric. scand., 1: 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Jonsson, P., 1959. Investigations on group versus individual feeding and on the interaction between genotype and environment in pigs. Ada. Agric. scand., 9: 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Jonsson, P. & King, J. W. B., 1962. Sources of variation in Danish Landrace pigs at progeny testing stations. Ada. Agric. scand. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kempthorne, O., 1955. The theoretical values of correlations between relatives in random mating populations. Genetics, 40: 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Kendall, M. G., 1957. A Course in Multivariate Analysis. Griffin, London. P. 185.Google Scholar
11King, J. W. B., 1957. The heritability of carcass traits in British bacon pigs. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1957: 49.Google Scholar
12Lauprecht, E. & Walter, E., 1960. Uber einige Umwelteinflusse auf die Mast und Schlachteigenschaften des Schweines bei danischen Mastpriifungsgruppen. Arch. Tierz., 3: 1.Google Scholar
13Lush, J. L., 1936. Genetic aspects of the Danish system of progeny-testing swine. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull., No. 204.Google Scholar
14Osterhoff, D., 1956. Erblichkeitsuntersuchungen und Nachkommenpriifungen auf Grund derErgebnisseder Schweinemastleistungsprufungen. Z. Tierz.ZiichtBiol., 68: 199.Google Scholar
15Quenouille, M. H., 1950. Introductory Statistics. Butterworth-Springer, London. Pp. xii and 248.Google Scholar
16Tallis, G. M., 1959. Sampling errors of genetic correlation coefficients calculated from analyses of variance and covariance. Aust. J. Stat., 1: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Wright, S., 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Amer. Nat., 56: 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar