Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:16:07.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters of beef characters and the genetic relationship between meat and milk production in British Friesian cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. L. Mason ,
V. E. Vial  and
R. Thompson
I. L. Mason
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Animal Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
V. E. Vial
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Institute, Dunsinea, Castleknock, Co. Dublin, Ireland
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Statistics, Edinburgh EH8 9LN
Get access

Summary

A beef progeny test was organized for 66 British Friesian bulls standing at AI centres in England. Eighty-one progeny groups averaging 8-5 steers each were reared on the farms of various co-operating organizations and their growth and carcass characters were recorded. Heritability of various measurements of gain varied from 0 to 0·34, of carcass conformation measures from 0·24 to 0·50, of muscle and fat percentage in the rib joint was 0·58 and 0·46 respectively, of other measures of fatness varied from 0·04 to 0·18, of weight of feet was 0·4 and of weight of hide 0·5.

Phenotypic correlations among beef characters gave no indication that carcass composition could be predicted from the external carcass measurements or subjective scores used in this study. Genetic correlations suggested that selection for weight for age would produce a fatter and more compact carcass. Genetic correlations were high and negative between milk yield (contemporary comparison) and weight for age, carcass weight/length, and blockiness of leg, and high and positive between milk yield, and carcass depth/length and percentage bone in the rib joint. Their standard errors were also high.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 135 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended procedures for use in the measurement of beef cattle and carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Bar-Anan, R. 1971. [Some problems in breeding dual-purpose cattle.] Züchtungskunde 43: 74–76.Google Scholar
Barker, J. S. F. and Robertson, Alan. 1966. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for the first three lactations in Friesian cows. Anim. Prod. 8: 221–240.Google Scholar
Brum, E. W. and Ludwick, T. M. 1969. Heritabilities of certain immature and mature body measurements and their correlations with first-lactation production of Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, P. J., Walker, D. K. and Gallagher, R. M. 1963. Factors associated with growth in beef cattle. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 6: 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. 1961. Comparative studies of meat. VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56: 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. W., Ramsey, C. B., Hobbs, C. S. and Temple, R. S. 1964. Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, carcass composition, and palatability. J. Dairy Sci. 47: 1138–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundiff, L. V., Chambers, D., Stephens, D. F. and Willham, R. L. 1964. Genetic analysis of some growth and carcass traits in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, E. P. and Broderick, T. 1969. Genetic and environmental parameters of growth and carcass traits in dual-purpose cattle. Jr. J. agric. Res. 8: 397–416.Google Scholar
Dinklage, H. 1965. [Relationship between milk, fat content and meat producing capacity of German Simmental cattle in Bavaria.] Bayer, landw. Jb. 42: 702–720.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. M. 1964. The influence of growth rate selection on some carcass characteristics of beef cattle. In Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals: Tech. Conf., East Melbourne (ed. Tribe, D. E.), pp. 9–1 to 9-9.Google Scholar
Hodges, J., O'Connor, L. K. and Higgin, R. 1961. The growth and size of Friesian cattle on commercial farms in England. 8th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, 1961 2: 30–31.Google Scholar
Jesswein, H. 1968. [The association between milk production, fattening performance and carcass composition in German Black Pied cattle.] Ziichtungskunde 40: 197–204.Google Scholar
Langlet, J. F., Gravert, H. O. and Rosenhahn, E. 1967. [Investigations on the herit-ability of beef production in Black Pied cattle.] Z. Tierziicht. ZüchtBiol. 83: 358–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, H. P. and Hutchison, H. G. 1962. The value of the tenth rib as a sample joint for the estimation of lean, fat and bone in carcasses of East African Zebu cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, J. and Ricordeau, G. 1966. Genetic correlations between milk production and conformation in the Montbeliard and Normandy cattle breeds. 9th int. Cong. Anim. Prod., Edinb., Scient. Progrm. Abstr., Eng. ed: p. 16 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McDaniel, B. T. and Legates, J. E. 1965. Association between body weight predicted from heart girth and production. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 947–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A. H., Fredeen, H. T. and Newman, J. A. 1970. Live performance and carcass characteristics of beef bulls in relation to selection for yearling weight. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, T. G. and Starkenburg, R. T. 1965. Genetic correlations between beef and dairy traits in dual purpose cattle. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 1 (Special issue): 45–52.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1951. Performance recording in beef cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 19: 1–24.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1964. Genetic relations between milk and beef characters in dual-purpose cattle breeds. Anim. Prod. 6: 31–45.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1971. Comparative beef performance of the large cattle breeds of western Europe. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 39: 1–29.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Robertson, Alan, Stewart, A. and Ashton, E. D. 1956. The progeny assessment of dairy sires for milk: the use of contemporary comparisons. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1956, pp. 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronningen, K. 1967. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for characters relating to milk production in cattle. Acta Agric. scand. 17: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Smithfield Club, Agricultural Research Council And Norfolk Agricul-Tural Research Station. 1966. Major beef research project. A comparison of the growth of different types of cattle for beef production. Underhill (Plymouth) Ltd. 53 pp.Google Scholar
Samson-Himmelstjerna, D. von. 1965. [Correlations between milk yield, fat percentage and weight gain in Oldenburg Black Pied cattle.] Züchtungskunde 37: 323–330.Google Scholar
Searle, S. R. 1961. Variance components in the unbalanced 2-way nested classification. Ann. math. Stat. 32: 1161–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, C. E., Harvey, W. R., Clark, R. T., Quesenberry, J. R. and Woodward, R. R. 1963. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters in ten years of Miles City ROP steer data. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 346–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soller, M., Shilo, A. and BAR-ANAN, R. 1966. A note on heritability of live-weight-for-age in Israel-Friesian dairy bull calves and its genetic correlation with milk yield. Anim. Prod. 8: 157–158.Google Scholar
Suess, G. G., Tyler, W. J. and Brungardt, V. H. 1968. Relationship between carcass characteristics of Holstein steers and genetic level of milk production. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 972–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syrstad, O. 1966. Studies on dairy herd records. IV. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters. Acta. Agric. scand. 16: 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talus, G. M. 1959. Sampling errors of genetic correlations coefficients calculated from analyses of variance and covariance. Aust. J. Stat. 1: 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temisan, V., Constantinescu, C. and Oltenacu, A. 1970. [Phenotypic and genetic correlations between milk and meat production in Romanian Simmental cattle]. Liter. stiint. lnst. Cere, zooteh., 27: 73–84.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W., 1958. Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Ann. math. Stat. 29: 614 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Vial, V. E. and Mason, I. L. 1962. Heritability estimates for growth and carcase characters in Friesian steers. 8th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, 1961 3: 20–23.Google Scholar
Wilk, J. C, Young, C. W. and Cole, C. L. 1963. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between certain body measurements and first lactation milk production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 46: 1273–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar