Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:54:05.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters for osteochondrosis in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire boars and correlations with leg weakness and production traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

B. Jørgensen  and
S. Andersen
B. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. Andersen
Affiliation:
National Committee for Pig Production, Axelborg, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the heritabilities and the genetic correlations of osteochondrosis in different joints and to estimate genetic correlations between osteochondrosis, leg weakness and production traits. The humerus condyles, anconeal process, distal ulna growth line, femoral condyles, distal tibia and medial trochlear ridge of talus on both sides of the animals were examined radiologically for osteochondral lesions and scored from 1 to 5 with increasing severity. The boars were also scored for 13 different leg weakness traits on a scale from 1 (normal) to 5 (very severe changes). During a 3-year period, a total of 2042 Landrace boars from 256 sires and 1946 Yorkshire boars from 240 sires were examined at a mean weight of 93 kg. The data were analysed by animal models for each breed. The Landrace was found to be more severely affected than the Yorkshire regarding osteochondrosis in all localities expect the anconeal process. The genetic correlations between left and right side scores of the osteochondral trait were close to 1. This indicates that genetically the same trait is measured in the left and in the right side of the animal. The heritability of average osteochondrosis scores was low to moderate ranging from 0•08 to 0•39 (s.e. between 0•02 and 0•04). The genetic correlations between osteochondrosis in the different body localities were low, indicating that osteochondrosis is not a generalized disease. The Landrace was more severely affected than the Yorkshire regarding all leg weakness symptoms except buck-kneed forelegs, forelegs turned out and weak pasterns on forelegs. The heritability of leg weakness traits ranged from 0•01 to 0•35 (s.e. between 0•01 and 0•04). Genetic correlations between osteochondrosis and leg weakness showed a clear picture for the Yorkshire breed regarding the humeral condyles: positive correlations with buck-kneed forelegs, forelegs turned out, stiff in front and rear. In both breeds osteochondrosis in femoral condyles showed a high positive correlation with hind legs turned out and a lower positive correlation with stiff in front. The sum of osteochondrosis traits (sumost) was unfavourably genetically correlated with daily gain, whereas the sum of leg weakness traits (sumleg) was unfavourably correlated with lean meat percentage in both breeds. The correlation between the summary measures sumost and sumleg was 0•09 (s.e. 0•11) in the Landrace and –0•07 (s.e. 0•12) in the Yorkshire.

Keywords

joint diseaseslive-weight gainmeatyieldpigsradiography
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 427 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bereskin, B. 1979. Genetic aspects of feet and legs soundness in swine. Journal of Animal Science 48: 1322—1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bring-Larsson, K. and Sundgren, P. -E. 1977. [Studies on locomotion problems in pigs.] Reports of the Agricultural College of Sweden, series A, no. 284.Google Scholar
Carlson, C. S., Hilley, H. D., Meuten, D. J., Hagan, J. M. and Moser, R. L. 1988. Effect of reduced growth rate on the prevalence and severity of osteochondrosis in gilts. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49: 396—402.Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, S. A., Häni, H. J., Valk, P. C. and, v. d. Wal, P. G. v. d. 1980. Osteochondrosis in six breeds of slaughter pigs. I. A morphological investigation of the status of osteochondrosis in relation to breed and level of feeding. Veterinary Quarterly 2: 28—41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedegebuure, S. A., Rothschild, M. F., Christian, L. L. and Ross, R. F. 1988. Severity of osteochondrosis in three genetic lines of Duroc swine divergently selected for front leg-weakness. Livestock Production Science 19: 487—498.Google Scholar
Grøndalen, T. 1974a. Osteochondrosis and arthrosis in pigs. III. A comparison of the incidence in young animals of the Norwegian Landrace and Yorkshire breeds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 15: 43—52.Google Scholar
Grøndalen, T. 1974b. Osteochondrosis and arthrosis in pigs. VI. Relationship to feed level and calcium, phosphorus and protein levels in the ration. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 15: 147—169.Google Scholar
Grøndalen, T. and Vangen, O. 1974. Osteochondrosis and arthrosis in pigs. V. A comparison of the incidence in three different lines of the Norwegian Landrace breed. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 15: 61—79.Google Scholar
Häni, H., Schwörer, D. and Blum, J. K. 1984. Osteochondrosis (OC) in performance-tested pigs: incidence in Swiss Landrace (SLR) and Swiss Large White (SLW) breeds, relationship to carcass characteristics, performance traits and leg weakness. Proceedings of the eighth international Pig Veterinary Society congress, Ghent, p. 266.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, B. 1995. Effect of different energy and protein levels on leg weakness and osteochondrosis in pigs. Livestock Production Science 41: 171—181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B. 2000. Osteochondrosis/osteoarthrosis and claw disorders in sows, associated with leg weakness. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 41: 123—138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, B., Arnbjerg, J. and Aaslyng, M. 1995. Pathological and radiological investigations on osteochondrosis in pigs, associated with leg weakness. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A — Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 42: 489—504.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, B. and Vestergaard, T. 1990. Genetics of leg weakness in boars at the Danish pig breeding stations. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 40: 59—69.Google Scholar
Lodde, v. K. H., Dzapo, V. and Wassmuth, R. 1985. Untersuchungen über Exterieurbeanstandungen bei der Körung von Jungebern. II. Beziehungen zwischen Exterieurbeanstandungen und Leistungsmerkmalen sowie genetische Disposition der Exterieurbeanstandungen. Zuchtungskunde 57: 47—57.Google Scholar
Lundeheim, N. 1987. Genetic analysis of osteochondrosis and leg weakness in the Swedish pig progeny testing scheme. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 37: 159—173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundeheim, N. and Rydhmer, L. 1990. Genetic analysis of osteochondrosis and leg weakness in the Swedish Landrace pig population. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XV, pp. 493—496.Google Scholar
McPhee, C. P. and Laws, L. 1976. An analysis of leg abnormalities of boars in the Queensland Performance Testing Station. Australian Veterinary Journal 52: 123—125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakano, T., Brennan, J. J. and Aherne, F. X. 1987. Leg weakness and osteochondrosis in swine: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67: 883—901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumaier, A. and Groeneveld, E. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30: 3—26.Google Scholar
Reiland, S. 1978. Pathology of so-called leg weakness in the pig. Acta Radiologica 358: 23—44.Google ScholarPubMed
Reiland, S., Ordell-Gustafson, N. and Lundeheim, N. 1980. Heredity of osteochondrosis. A correlative and comparative investigation in different breeds using progeny testing. Proeedings of the sixth international Pig Veterinary Society congress, 30 June-3 July 1980, Denmark, p. 328.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. F. and Christian, L. L. 1988. Genetic control of front-leg weakness in Duroc swine. I. Direct response to five generations of divergent selection. Livestock Production Science 19: 459—471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwörer, D., Häni, H. J. and Blum, J. K. 1985. Fundamentmängel and gelenksveränderungen bei mastschweinen. Der Kleinviehzüchter 33: 634—644.Google Scholar
Sehested, E. and Empel, W. 1986. Osteochondrose hos Norsk Landsvin bedømt med hjelp av computertomografi (CT). Omfang og sammenheng med andre faktorer. NJF-seminar no. 111: Förbättringar av husdjurens benhälsa, 7-8 October 1986, Sånga-Säby, Sweden.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J., Russell, W. S. and Sales, D. I. 1983. Genetics of leg weakness in performance-tested boars. Animal Production 36: 117—130.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. D., Christian, L. L. and Schneider, J. F. 1980. The effects of sire soundness classification and feed restriction on performance and leg scores in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 51: 132 (abstr.).Google Scholar