Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:27:54.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia 4. Weaner production from purebred and reciprocally crossbred dams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. Thorpe ,
D. K. R. Cruickshank  and
R. Thompson
W. Thorpe
Affiliation:
Central Research Station, Mazabuka, Zambia
D. K. R. Cruickshank
Affiliation:
Central Research Station, Mazabuka, Zambia
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Statistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ§
Get access

Abstract

Estimates of dam reproductive performance are reported for purebred Africander, Angoni, Barotse and Boran dams, and the reciprocal crossbreds of the latter three breeds, under ranching conditions in Zambia.

Mean performances based on a maximum of 1996 records collected over six parities were: calving rate, 65·6%; weaning rate, 62·8%; calf birth weight, 26·6kg; calf weaning weight, 163·6kg; and dam live weight at weaning, 363 0 kg.

Purebred Africander and Barotse dams had significantly poorer calving rates, 542 and 57·6% respectively, than the purebred dams of the Angoni and Boran breeds, 69·1 and 66·0% respectively. Reciprocal crossbred dams of the latter two breeds had the highest calving rates, 71·2 and 74·4%. Heterosis estimates for calving rate were 0·8% for Angoni/Barotse crosses, 7·8% for Angoni/Boran crosses and 10·3% for Barotse/Boran crosses and, for weaning rate, 3·7, 6·7 and 11·5% respectively. There were no differences between reciprocal crossbred dams for calving and weaning percentages. The mortality rate of calves born to crossbred dams was 40% and that of the calves born to purebred dams of the same breeds 4·7%. Dam status at mating had an important effect on fertility with the calving rate of dams dry at mating, 89·1%, contrasting with a rate of 39·8% for those dams that were lactating at mating and that had calved late in the season.

There were large differences between breeds for calf weights but heterosis estimates were small and nonsignificant. There were no differences between the progeny weights of reciprocal crossbred dams. Sex, date and period of birth, and dam status had significant effects on calf weights.

Africander dams had the heaviest, and Angoni dams the lightest, live weights at weaning, 421·1 and 320·7 kg respectively. Heterosis estimates for dam live weights were small and non-significant, and reciprocal crossbred differences were unimportant. Dams which lost most live weight during the dry season, that had extremely light live weights at the beginning of the breeding season or that gained little weight during the breeding season had significantly poorer fertility than other dams.

Overall estimates of heritability derived by dam/daughter regression were 0·20 for calving percentage, 0·76 for calf birth weight and 0·72 for calf weaning weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 165 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Astle, W. L. 1966. Edaphic grasslands in Zambia. Proc. int. Grassld Congr., Brazil, Vol. 1, pp. 363–373.Google Scholar
Brinks, J. S., Clark, R. T., Kieffer, N. M. and Urick, J. J. 1964. Predicting producing ability in range Hereford cows. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 593 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Buck, N. G., Light, D., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Rennie, T. W., Pratchett, D., Capper, B. S. and Trail, J. C. M. 1976. Environmental factors affecting beef cow reproductive performance in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 23: 357–363.Google Scholar
Capper, B. S., Pratchett, D., Rennie, T. W., Light, D., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Buck, N. G. and Trail, J. C. M. 1977. Effects of rumen stimulatory licks on reproductive performance and live-weight gain of beef cattle' in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 24: 49–55.Google Scholar
Crockett, J. R., Koger, M. and Franke, D. E. 1978a. Rotational crossbreeding of beef cattle: reproduction by generation. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1163–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, J. R., Koger, M. and Franke, D. E. 1978b. Rotational crossbreeding of beef cattle: preweaning traits by generation. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1170–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundiff, L. V., Gregory, K. E. and Koch, R. M. 1974a. Effects of heterosis on reproduction in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 38: 711–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cundiff, L. V., Gregory, K. E., Schwulst, F. J. and Koch, R. M. 1974b. Effects of heterosis on maternal performance and milk production in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 38: 728–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deese, R. E. and Koger, M. 1967. Heritability of fertility in Brahman and crossbred cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 984–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwin, G. O., Lamb, R. D. and Bisschop, J. H. R. 1967. Some factors affecting reproductive performance in beef females. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 171–177.Google Scholar
Holness, D. H., Hopley, J. D. H. and Hale, D. H. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition, live weight, temporary weaning and breed on the occurrence of oestrus in beef cows during the post-partum period. Anim. Prod. 26: 47–54.Google Scholar
Koch, R. M. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding: VI. Maternal effects in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 1316–1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koger, M. 1973. Summary. In Crossbreeding Beef Cattle, Ser. 2 (ed. Koger, M., Cunha, T. J. and Warnick, A. C.), pp. 434–447. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Fla.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. and Turner, J. W. 1972. Estimation of maternal heterosis in preweaning traits of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 1146–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1974. Intensive Beef Production. 2nd ed.Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rakha, A. M., Igboeli, G. and King, J. L. 1971. Calving interval, gestation and postpartum periods of indigenous Central African cattle under a restricted system of breeding. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 507–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, F. D., Oliver, J. and Clarke, G. P. Y. 1975. Analyses of some factors which affect the productivity of beef cows and of their calves in a marginal rainfall area of Rhodesia. 1. Factors affecting calving rate. Anim. Prod. 21: 41–49Google Scholar
Smith, G. M., Fitzhugh, H. A., Cundiff, L. V., Cartwright, T. C. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Heterosis for maturing patterns in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruikshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1979. The growth and carcass characteristics of crosses of Hereford and Friesian with Angoni, Barotse and Boran cattle in Zambia. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 93: 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980a. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 1. Factors affecting weaner production from Angoni, Barotse and Boran dams. Anim. Prod. 30: 217–234.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980b. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 2. Live weights for age of purebred and reciprocally crossbred progeny. Anim. Prod. 30: 235–243.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980c. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 3. Carcass characteristics of purebred and reciprocally crossbred castrated males. Anim. Prod. 30: 245–252.Google Scholar
Tonn, R. 1975. Selection criteria in extensive breeding of beef cattle with examples from Kenya. Tierziichter 27: 425–428.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M., Buck, N. G., Light, D., Rennie, T. W., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Pratchett, D. and Capper, B. S. 1977. Productivity of Africander, Tswana, Tuli and crossbred beef cattle in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 24: 57–62.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M., Sacker, G. D. and Fisher, I. L. 1971. Crossbreeding beef cattle in Western Uganda. 3. Genetic analysis of body weight. Anim. Prod. 13: 153–163.Google Scholar
Ward, H. K. 1968. Supplementation of beef cows grazing on veld. Rhod. J. agric. Res. 6: 93–101.Google Scholar