Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:58:50.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia 2. Live weights for age of purebred and reciprocally crossbred progeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. Thorpe ,
D. K. R. Cruickshank  and
R. Thompson
W. Thorpe
Affiliation:
Central Research Station, Mazabuka, Zambia
D. K. R. Cruickshank
Affiliation:
Central Research Station, Mazabuka, Zambia
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Statistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
Get access

Abstract

Live weights from birth to 3·5 years are reported for beef cattle reared under ranching conditions in Zambia. The 809 cattle were purebred Africanders, Angonis, Barotses and Borans and the reciprocal crossbreds of the latter three breeds born in 2 years. All animals born in the 1st year and half the males born in the 2nd year grazed natural grassland. The remaining males and all females born in the 2nd year received, in addition, dry season supplementary feed from 1·5 years of age.

The interaction of genotype with year-of-birth was important but not the interactions of genotype with management or sex. Purebred progeny of the introduced Africander breed were heavier than the progeny of the indigenous Angoni and Barotse breeds in both year-of-birth groups, but only heavier than progeny of the introduced Boran breed in the first group. On average, the Africander progeny had live-weight advantages of about 16% and 10%, and the Boran progeny advantages of about 12·5% and 5·5% over the purebred Angoni and Barotse progeny respectively. Heterosis estimates tended to increase with age, reaching levels of about 5 to 6% in the Barotse/Boran crosses at and after 1·5 years. Heterosis was not shown by the other crosses. The Barotse and Boran breeds had similar maternal effects which were superior to those of the Angoni breed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 235 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Department of Research and Specialist Services. 1978. A.Rep. 1977, Div. Livestock and Pastures. Rhodesian Government Printer, Salisbury.Google Scholar
Lasley, J. F., Sibbit, B., Langford, L., Comfort, J. E., Dyer, A. J., Krause, G. F. and Hedrick, H. B. 1973. Growth traits in straightbred and reciprocally crossed Angus, Hereford and Charolais steers. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 1044–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, C. R. and Gregory, K. E. 1975. Heterosis and management effects in postweaning growth of Angus, Hereford and reciprocal cross cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, I. L. and Maule, J. P. 1960. The Indigenous Livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Maule, J. P. 1973. The role of the indigenous breeds for beef production in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 3: 111–130.Google Scholar
Nitter, G. 1978. Breed utilization for meat production in sheep. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 46: 131–143.Google Scholar
Plasse, D. 1976. The possibility of genetic improvement of beef cattle in developing countries with particular reference to Latin America. In Beef Cattle Production in Developing Countries (ed. Smith, A. J.), pp. 308–331. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1974. Intensive Beef Production. 2nd ed. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rakha, A. M., Igboeli, G. and King, J. L. 1971. Calving interval, gestation and postpartum periods of indigenous central African cattle under a restricted system of breeding. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 507–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacker, G. D., Trail, J. C. M. and Fisher, I. L. 1971a. Crossbreeding beef cattle in western Uganda. 2. Environmental influences on body weight. Anim. Prod. 13: 143–152.Google Scholar
Sacker, G. D., Trail, J. C. M. and Fisher, I. L. 1971b. Crossbreeding beef cattle in western Uganda. 6. A note on hybrid vigour in Red Poll-Boran crosses. Anim. Prod. 13: 181–184.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1979. The growth and carcass characteristics of crosses of Hereford and Friesian with Angoni, Barotse and Boran cattle in Zambia. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 93: 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980a. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 1. Factors affecting weaner production from Angoni, Barotse and Boran dams. Anim. Prod. 30: 217–234.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980b. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 3. Carcass characteristics of purebred and reciprocally crossbred castrated males. Anim. Prod. 30: 245–252.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M. 1969. A study of performance traits of crossbred cattle in a new beef cattle ranching area in Uganda. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M., Buck, N. G., Light, D., Rennie, T. W., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Pratchett, D. and Capper, B. S. 1977. Productivity of Africander, Tswana, Tuli and crossbred beef cattle in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 24: 57–62.Google Scholar