Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:50:38.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
L. E. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
R. S. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
C. S. Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
R. E. Agnew
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
M. G. Porter
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

A partially balanced change-over design experiment involving 192 beef steers, which were initially 14 months old and 415 kg live weight, was carried out to determine the intakes of 136 silages from commercial farms in Northern Ireland. Each silage was offered ad libitum as the sole food to 10 animals, with eight silages offered in each of 17 periods over 2 years. A standard grass hay was offered to 16 animals in each period to enable period effects on intake to be removed. Detailed chemical and biological compositions of the silages were also determined. The ranges for pH and dry matter (DM), crude protein, ammonia-nitrogen and apparent digestible organic matter (in vivo) concentrations in the silages and silage dry DM intakes were 3·50 to 5·49 (s.d. 0·396); 155 to 413 (s.d. 43·1) g/kg; 79 to 212 (s.d. 24·4) g/kg DM; 45 to 384 (s.d. 63·2) g/kg total nitrogen; 528 to 769 (s.d. 58) g/kg DM and 4·3 to 10·9 (s.d. 1·13) kg/day respectively. Relationships between intake and individual parameters or groups of parameters have been developed using simple and multiple linear regression analysis and partial least-squares analyses. Silage intake was closely related to factors which influence the extent of digestion and rate of passage of the material through the animal, as indicated by the strong relationships (R2 of regressions = 0·28 to 0·50) with in vivo apparent digestibility and rumen degradability and the concentrations of the fibre and nitrogen factors. Intake was poorly correlated with factors such as pH, total acidity, buffering capacity and the concentrations of lactic, acetic and butyric acids (R2 of regressions = zero to 0·11). Near infrared reflectance spectrometry (NIRS) provided the best fit relationship with intake (R2 of relationship = 0·90). The results also indicate that the intake potential of silages can be directly predicted with a high degree of accuracy from the NIRS of both dried and undried samples of silage, provided the appropriate sample preparation and scanning methods are used.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C. W., Givens, V. I. and Deaville, E. R. 1994. Prediction of organic matter digestibility in vivo of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy: effect of calibration method, residual moisture and particle size. Animal Feed Science and Technology 50: 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. N. and Warner, R. G. 1968. Effect of propionate and citrate on depressed feed intake after intraruminal infusions of acetate in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 51: 10911094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan-Smith, J. G. 1990. An investigation into palatability as a factor responsible for reduced intake of silage by sheep. Animal Production 50: 253260.Google Scholar
Buchanan-Smith, J. G. and Phillip, L. E. 1986. Food intake i n sheep following intraruminal infusion of extracts from lucerne silage with particular reference to organic acids and products of protein degradation, journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106: 611617.Google Scholar
Cushnahan, A., Gordon, F. J., Ferris, C. P. W., Chestnutt, D. M. B. and Mayne, C. S. 1994. The use of sheep as a model to predict the relative intakes of silages by dairy cattle. Animal Production 59: 415420.Google Scholar
Flynn, A. V. 1979. The effect of silage dry-matter digestibility in vitro on live-weight gain and carcass gain by beef cattle fed silage ad libitum. Animal Production 28: 423 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Gill, M., Rook, A. J. and Thiago, L. R. S. 1988. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of roughages by the dairy cow. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 262279. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. M., Larsen, R. E. and Lanning, N. M. 1980. Prediction of silage digestibility and intake by chemical analyses or in vitro fermentation techniques. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 579586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M. 1981. Equations for predicting silage intake by beef and dairy cattle. Proceedings of the sixth silage Edinburgh, pp. 3536.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. 1993. The effect of formic acid, sulphuric acid and a bacterial inoculant on silage fermentation and the food intake and milk production of lactating dairy cows. Animal Production 56: 2942.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. 1985. Effect of fibre on feed quality for dairy cows. Proceedings of the 46th Minnesota nutrition conference, pp. 209224.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. 1987. Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. Journal of Animal Science 64: 15481558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moisio, T. and Heikonen, M. 1989. A titration method for silage assessment. Animal Feed Science and Technology 22: 341353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. J. and L'Estrange, J. L. 1977. Voluntary feed intake and metabolism of sheep when lactic acid is administered in the feed or intraruminally. Journal of the British Grassland Society 32: 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offer, N. W., Dewhurst, R. J. and Thomas, C. 1994. The use of electrometric titration to improve the routine prediction of silage intake by lambs and dairy cows. Animal Production 58: 427 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Offer, N. W., Thomas, C. and Dewhurst, R. J. 1995. Validation of advisory models for the prediction of voluntary intake of grass silage by lambs and dairy cows. Animal Science 60: 515 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and Mehrez, A. Z. 1977. Estimation of the extent of protein degradation from feeds in the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36: 78a.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, R. S., Gordon, F. J., Agnew, R. E., Barnes, R. J. and Steen, R. W. J. 1997. The use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy on dried samples to predict biological parameters of grass silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology In press.Google Scholar
Pippard, C. J., Porter, M. G., Steen, R. W. J., Gordon, F. J., Mayne, C. S., Agnew, R. E., Unsworth, E. F. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1996. A method for obtaining and storing uniform silage for feeding experiments. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57: 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. G., Steen, R. W. J., Kilpatrick, D. J., Gordon, F. J., Mayne, C. S., Poots, R. E., Unsworth, E. F. and Pippard, C. J. 1995. Electrometric titration as a method of predicting the chemical composition and corrected dry matter concentration of silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 56: 217230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, K. and Thomas, C. 1984. Intake, digestibility and animal performance. In Eurowilt. Efficiency of silage systems: comparison between wilted and unwilted silages (ed. Zimmer, E. and Wilkins, R. J.), pp. 6470. Landbauforschung Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Dhanoa, M. S. and Gill, M. 1990a. Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 2. Principal component and ridge regression analyses. Animal Production 50: 439454.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Dhanoa, M. S. and Gill, M. 1990b. Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 3. Precision of alternative prediction models. Animal Production 50: 455466.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J. and Gill, M. 1990. Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 1. Linear regression analyses. Animal Production 50: 425438.Google Scholar
Simkins, K. L., Suttie, J. W. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 4. Effects of acetate, propionate, butyrate and glucose on voluntary food intake in dairy cattle, journal of Dairy Science 48: 16351642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1988. Factors affecting the utilization of grass silage for beef production. In Efficient beef production from grass (ed. Frame, J.), pp. 129139. Occasional publication no. British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1991. The effect of level of protein supplementation on the performance and carcass composition of young bulls given grass silage ad libitum. Animal Production 52: 465475.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gill, M. and Austin, A. R. 1980. The effects of supplements of fishmeal and lactic acid on the voluntary aintake of silage by calves. Grass and Forage Science 35: 275279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Fenlon, J. S., Cook, J. E. and Wilson, R. F. 1978. A further analysis of relationships between silage composition and voluntary intake by sheep. Proceedings of the fifth silage conference, Ayr, pp. 3435.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. and Harris, C. E. 1971. The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. 1. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. Journal ofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 77: 531537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar