Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:20:42.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy: protein interactions in growing boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. 1. Effects on growth, carcass characteristics and organ weights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. S. Rao  and
K. J. McCracken
D. S. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Agricultural Chemistry, Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
K. J. McCracken
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Agricultural Chemistry, Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Get access

Abstract

Seven replicates of five littermate boar Landrace pigs were used to evaluate the effects of (a) reducing the food intake within the practical range or (b) reducing energy intake without reducing protein intake, between 33 and 90 kg live weight on growth, nitrogen balance and carcass characteristics. Three levels of food intake (ad libitum, 0·90 and 0·80 ad libitum) were used and the dietary protein contents ranged from 250 to 312 g crude protein per kg dry matter (DM) to equalize protein intake with reduced food intake. All the diets were of similar amino acid composition, and lysine per kg DM ranged from 14·3 to 17·9 g. The food was given twice daily. Balance trials were conducted at 45 and 65 kg live weight and all pigs were slaughtered at 90 kg live weight to assess carcass characteristics. Reducing food intake or only energy intake significantly reduced live-weight gain (P < 0·001). Reducing food intake decreased nitrogen retention (P < 0·01) during the 65-kg balance period. Reducing food intake had no effect on fat thickness measurements but measurements at shoulder (P < 0·001), mid back (P < 0·001), C(P< 0·01) and P2 (P < 0·05) decreased and lean: fat in rumpback increased (P < 0·05) when energy intake was reduced. The weights of small intestine (P < 0·001), large intestine (P < 0·05), liver (P < 0·05) and kidneys (P < 0·05) were significantly reduced as food intake was reduced. Energy is more limiting than protein when the intake of a diet providing for optimal growth of high potential boars is reduced between 33 and 90 kg live weight.

Keywords

boarscarcass compositionenergy intakegrowthprotein intake
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists. 15th ed. Association of Offical Analytical Chemists, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Berschauer, F., Close, W. H. and Stephens, D. B. 1983. The influence of protein: energy value of the ration and level of feed intake on the energy and nitrogen metabolism of the growing pig. II. N-metabolism at two environmental temperatures. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and King, R. H. 1982. The influence of dietary protein and level of feeding on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of entire and castrated male pigs. Animal Production 35:177–184.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Taverner, M. R. 1988. Genotype and sex effects on the relationship between energy intake and protein deposition in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66: 676–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curie, D. M. 1983. The influence of feeding level from 20 to 45 kg live weight on the performance and body composition of female and entire male pigs. Animal Production 36:193–199.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Tavemer, M. R. and Curie, D. M. 1984. Effect of feeding level and dietary protein content on the growth, body composition and rate of protein deposition in pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg. Animal Production 38: 233–240.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curie, D. M. 1985. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal Production 40: 497–503.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G. L., Hays, V. W., Trujillo-Figueroa, V. and Kemp, J. D. 1978. Effects of dietary protein and energy levels for growing-finishing swine on performance, muscle composition and eating quality of pork. Journal of Animal Science 47: 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. L. and Lucas, I. A. M. 1972. Response to variations in dietary energy intakes by growing pigs. 3. Effect of level of intake of diets of differing protein and fat content on the performance of growing pigs. Animal Production 15:127–137.Google Scholar
Dirar, H. A., Harper, D. B. and Collins, M. A. 1985. Biochemical and microbiological studies on kawal, a meat substitute derived by fermentation of Cassia obtusifolia leaves. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36: 881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, L. A. den and Verstegen, M. W. A. 1984. The effect of energy intake of gilts on the supply of metabolisable energy and protein deposition. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 32: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haydon, K. D., Tanksley, T. D. and Knabe, D. A. 1989. Performance and carcass composition of limit-fed growing-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 67:1916–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A., Jørgensen, H. and Fernández, J. A. 1983. Maintenance requirement and the net energy value of different diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 10: 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koong, L. J., Nienabar, J. A. and Mersmann, H. J. 1983. Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in genetically obese and lean pigs. Journal of Nutrition 113:1626–1631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koong, L. J., Nienabar, J. A., Pekas, J. C. and Yen, J. T. 1982. Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in pigs. Journal of Nutrition 112:1638–1642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCracken, K. J. and Stockdale, R. I. 1989. Voluntary feed intake of pigs of higher genetic potential fed pellets to appetite: effects of sex and dietary protein content. In The voluntary food intake of pigs (ed. Forbes, J. M., Varley, M. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 13, pp. 117–118.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. 1940. Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characteristics. III. Effect of the plane of nutrition on the form and composition of the bacon pig. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 30:511–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, S. H. M., Bergström, P. L., Lenis, N. P., De Wijs, M. and Dekker, R. A. 1980. The effect of daily energy intake on growth rate and composition of weight gain in pigs. Livestock Production Science 7: 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. C. 1985. The effect of nutrient density of the diet and of a change in nutrient density on the performance of pigs fed ad libitum for bacon. Animal Production 40: 169–174.Google Scholar
Peers, D. G., Taylor, A. G. and Whittemore, C. T. 1977. The influence of feeding level and level of dietary inclusion on the digestibility of barley meal in the pig. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2:41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, D. S. and McCracken, K. J. 1990. Protein requirements of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. Animal Production 51:179–187.Google Scholar
Rao, D. S. and McCracken, K. J. 1991. Effect of energy intake on protein and energy metabolism of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. Animal Production 52: 499–507.Google Scholar
Rao, D. S. and McCracken, K. J. 1992. Energy: protein interactions in growing boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. 2. Effects on chemical composition of gain and whole body protein turn-over. Animal Production 54: 83–93.Google Scholar
Stahly, T. S. and Wahlstrom, R. C. 1973. Effects of dietary protein level and feed restriction on performance and carcass characteristics of swine. Journal of Animal Science 36: 1109–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar