Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:57:53.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of two meal supplements on the progress of calves receiving autumn grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1961

D. T. Chambers
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
Get access

Extract

1. Three groups, each comprising four Hereford-cross and four Friesian half-sib male calves, were fed milk substitute and offered grass cut from autumn pastures. Two of the groups received meal supplements of similar energy value but differing in protein content. The third group received no meal supplement.

2. As the consumption of meal rose the intake of herbage dry matter decreased but total dry matter intake increased.

3. The effects of the two meals on the progress of the calves were similar but not apparent until after the first 6 weeks. The lack of response to the high protein content of one meal suggests that energy may be the limiting factor to growth of calves reared on autumn pasture.

4. Hereford-cross calves which did not receive a meal supplement tended to make the best live-weight gains during the subsequent grazing season, but no such recovery was made by the Friesians.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chambers, D. T., 1961. Grass as food for the calf. I. The value of cut grass in the diet of the unweaned calf in comparison with hay and concentrates. J. agric. Sci. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar