Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:39:35.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol on live-weight gain, and serum hormone and metabolite concentrations, in steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. R. Peters ,
D. G. Evans ,
D. J. Read ,
Janet M. Beeby  and
W. Haresign
A. R. Peters
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
D. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
D. J. Read
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Janet M. Beeby
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD
W. Haresign
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD
Get access

Abstract

Yearling steers, 39 Friesians on an 18-month beef production system (group 1) and 38 Hereford × Friesians on a 20-month beef production system (group 2), were weighed, blood sampled and then half of them were implanted subcutaneously with 300 mg trenbolone acetate and 30 mg hexoestrol. All steers were then weighed and blood sampled at 1-month intervals for a further 3 (group 1) or 4 (group 2) months. Serum was assayed for prolactin, insulin, growth hormone, glucose and blood urea nitrogen concentrations. Steroid treatment increased daily live-weight gain by 28 to 37% over the experimental period and the proportional response appeared to be correlated with the plane of nutrition. Neither prolactin nor glucose concentrations were affected by the treatment. However, in both groups 1 and 2, growth hormone concentrations were significantly higher in implanted steers, whilst urea-nitrogen concentrations were significantly lower. Insulin concentrations were consistently, although not significantly, lower in implanted than in control steers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 385 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, D. and Kilkenny, B. 1980. Planned Beef Production. Granada Publishing, London.Google Scholar
Beeby, J. M. 1979. Growth and its control in beef cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Nott.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. 1980. The effect of trenbolone acetate on growth, blood hormones and metabolites, and nitrogen balance of beef heifers. Anim. Prod. 30: 389–394.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. and Dempster, D. G. 1979. Effect of hexoestrol on the response of finishing steers to treatment with trenbolone acetate. Vet.Rec. 105: 283–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galbraith, H. and Geraghty, K. J. 1978. Effect of dietary energy intake and implantation with trienbolone acetate and hexoestrol on the growth performance and blood metabolites and hormones of British Friesian steers. Anim. Prod. 26: 361 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. and Watson, H. B. 1978. Performance, blood and carcase characteristics of finishing steers treated with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol. Vet.Rec. 103: 28–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, I. C, Bines, J. A., Balch, C. C. and Cowie, A. T. 1975. Hormone and metabolite differences between lactating beef and dairy cattle. Life Set. 16: 1285–1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heitzman, R. J. and Chan, K. H. 1974. Alterations in weight gain and levels of plasma metabolites, proteins, insulin and free fatty acids following implantation of an anabolic steroid n i heifers. Br. vet. J. 130: 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitzman, R. J., Chan, K. H. and Hart, I. C. 1977. Liveweight gains, blood levels of metabolites, proteins and hormones following implantation of anabolic agents in steers. Br. vet. J. 133: 62–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johke, T. 1970. Factors affecting the plasma prolactin level in the cow and the goat as determined by radioimmunoassay. Endocr. jap. 17: 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koprowski, J. A., Tucker, H. A. and Convey, E. M. 1972. Prolactin and growth hormone circadian periodicity in lactating cows. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 140: 1012–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. and Miller, H. 1965. Automated and manual direct methods for the determination of blood urea. Clin. Chem. 11: 624–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, G., Dawson, A. and Marks, V. 1968. Manual and autoanalyser methods for measuring blood glucose using guaiacum and glucose oxidase. Proc. Ass. Clin. Biochem. 5: 42–45.Google Scholar
Schams, D. 1972. Prolactin levels in bovine blood, influenced by milking manipulation, genital stimulation and oxytocin administration with specific consideration of the seasonal variations. Acta endocr., Copenh. 71: 684–696.Google ScholarPubMed
Stollard, R. J. and Jones, D. W. 1979. The response to growth-promoting implants in finishing steers and heifers both in yards and at grass and the economic implications. Anim. Prod. 28: 415–416 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Stollard, R. J. and Jones, D. W. 1980. Revalor as a growth promoter for finishing steers. Anim. Prod. 30: 454–455 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. 1978. Relation of hormonal variations to nutritional studies and metabolism of ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 61: 281–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, H. A. 1971. Hormonal response to milking. J. Anim.Sci. 32: Suppl. 1, pp. 13–144.Google Scholar
Webb, R. and Lamming, G. E. 1981. Patterns of plasma prolactin in post-partum suckled cows. J. Endocr. 90: 391–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, R., Lamming, G. E., Haynes, N. B. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1980. Plasma progesterone and gonadotrophin concentrations and ovarian activity in post-partum dairy cows. J. Reprod. & Fert. 59: 133–143.Google Scholar