Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T16:35:54.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of the frequency of feeding concentrates on milk production and eating behaviour in Ayrshire dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. S. Gill  and
M. E. Castle
M. S. Gill
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
Get access

Abstract

Two separate experiments were conducted with 12 lactating and four non-lactating Ayrshire cows to compare three frequencies of feeding concentrates per day. Milk production was measured in a 16-week experiment in which the lactating cows were given either a low- or a high-protein concentrate 2, 4 or 22 times (×) per day. Eating behaviour was measured in a 15-week experiment in which the non-lactating cows were also given the low- and high-protein concentrates 2 and 22 × per day. The low- and high-protein concentrates had concentrations of 128 and 202 g crude protein/kg dry matter respectively. Grass silage with a digestibility of organic matter in the dry matter of 0·655 was offered ad libitum to all the cows. Frequency of feeding had no significant effects on silage intake, total nutrient intake, milk yield and live weight. The milk fat concentration increased as the frequency of feeding increased but none of the differences in this and the other milk constituents was significant. Total eating time per day and eating and ruminating time per kg dry matter were not significantly different on the 2 × and the 22 × feeding treatments. There were no interactions between the feeding-frequency treatments and the two types of concentrates. It is concluded that there were no advantages in offering concentrates in more than two separate feeds per day when the daily amount averaged about 7 kg per cow and good-quality silage was available ad libitum

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, R. H. and Mcgowan, Mary. 1969. The assessment of the nutritive value of silage by determination of in vitro digestibility on homogenates prepared from fresh undried silage. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. 1971. Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughages. Br. J. Nutr. 26: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, A. W. A. and Dunton, C. R. 1967. Effect of frequency of feeding upon food utilization by ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J. R. and Merilan, C. P. 1961. Effects of frequency of feeding on production characteristics and feed utilization in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 664–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E., Retter, W. C. and Watson, J. N. 1979. Silage and milk production: comparisons between grass silage of three different chop lengths. Grass Forage Sci. 34: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1976. Silage and milk production. A comparison between barley and groundnut cake as supplements to silage of high digestibility. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. W. and Hall, W. B. 1969. Cyclic change-over designs. Biometrika 56: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, W. A. and McDonald, P. 1961. Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12: 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1981. The effects of feeding frequency on the growth and efficiency of food utilization of ruminants: an analysis of published results. Anim. Prod. 32: 275–283.Google Scholar
Gill, M. S. 1981. The utilization of silage by dairy cows with special reference to supplementation. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Univ. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980. The role of supplements in the spring-calving herd. In Supplementation and Effective Use of Grassland for Dairying. pp. 111–117. British Grassland Society, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., McCaughey, W. J. and Morrison, B. 1981a. Milk Production. Agric. Res. Inst. of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Unsworth, E. F. and Peoples, A. C. 1981b. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for milk production. Rep. agric. Res. Inst. Nth. Ire. 1980–81, 54, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
Holter, J. B., URBAN, W. E. Jr, Hayes, H. H. and Davis, H. A. 1977. Utilization of diet components fed blended or separately to lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 60: 1288–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1973. Effect of higher frequency of feeding on rumen fermentation and milk production of dairy cows. Kieler milchw. ForschBer. 25: 245–250.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1976. Influence of the composition of the ration and the feeding frequency on pH regulation in the rumen and on feed intake in ruminants. Livest. Prod. Sci. 3: 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, M. P., Kirchgessner, M., and Schwarz, F. J. 1979. [Feed intake and milk production of dairy cows under different feeding frequencies of basal ration and concentrates.] Züchtungskunde 51: 215–226.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. L. 1943. A method of equalized feeding for studies with dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 26: 1011–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhold, K., Rosegger, S., Schlunsen, D. and Walter, K. 1976. Significance of varied feeding and more frequent milking and feeding for economics of dairy farming. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 41: 5718 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. and Cowper, J. L. 1966. Diurnal variations in the excretion of faeces and urine by sheep fed once daily or at hourly intervals. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 757–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mochrie, R. D., Thomas, W. E. and Lucas, H. L. 1956. Influence of frequency of feeding equalized intakes on animal response. J. Anim. Sci. 15: 1256 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Patterson, M. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1962. Changeover designs. Tech. Bull. N. Carol, agric. Exp. Stn, No. 147.Google Scholar
Rees, P. and Rowlinson, P. 1981. The effect of a fully controlled out-of-parlour concentrate dispenser on milk yield, composition and weight changes of dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 32: 392–393 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Retter, W. C. 1978. The production and utilization of highquality grass silage by dairy cows. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Univ. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Kelly, Morag E. 1976. The effect of frequency of feeding on milk secretion in the Ayrshire cow. J. Dairy Res. 43: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiktorsson, H. and Bengtsson, A. 1973. Feeding the dairy cow during the first part of lactation. II. Comparison of ad lib feeding of wilted hay crop silage and concentrate blended or separate. Swedish J. agric. Res. 3: 161–166.Google Scholar