Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:55:09.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of selection for body size on the weight and cellular structure of seven mouse muscles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Ignatius Byrne
Affiliation:
Departments of Agricultural Biology and Anatomy, University College, Dublin, Ireland
J. C. Hooper
Affiliation:
Departments of Agricultural Biology and Anatomy, University College, Dublin, Ireland
J. C. Mccarthy
Affiliation:
Departments of Agricultural Biology and Anatomy, University College, Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Summary

The effects of selection for increased and decreased body weight in mice at 5 and at 10 weeks of age on the weight and mean fibre diameter and number of seven different muscles were studied by dissecting and histologically examining animals from large, small and unselected control lines. The purpose was to learn how selection for body size affects muscle weight and its components. Selection for increased body weight significantly increased the weight of m. biceps brachii, m. tibialis anterior, m. pectoralis major, m. brachio-radialis, m. soleus, m. rectus femoris and m. psoas major. These increases in muscle weight reflected increases in both fibre diameter and number although there were a few exceptions. Selection for low body weight produced decreases in the weight of all muscles. These reflected significant reductions in mean fibre diameter and, in most cases, fibre number. Significant estimates of heterosis in mean fibre diameter were obtained in m. biceps brachii and m. tibialis anterior from crosses between the Large and Small lines selected at 5 weeks and also between the lines selected at 10 weeks of age, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Didley, D. D., Aberle, E. D., Forrest, J. C. and Judge, M. C. 1970. Porcine muscularity and properties associated with pale soft exudative muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 681685.Google Scholar
Goldspink, G. 1962. Studies on postembryonic growth and development of skeletal muscle. 1. Evidence of 2 phases in which striated muscle fibres are able to exist. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 62B, 10: 135.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P., Hooper, A. C. and McCarthy, J. C. 1973. Effects of divergent selection for body weight on fibre number and diameter in two mouse muscles. Anim. Prod. 16: 716.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. V. J. and Naude, R. T. 1970. The accuracy of measurement of individual skeletal muscle fibres separated by a rapid technique. Lab. Pract. 19: 161164.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawrie, R. A. 1966. Meat Science. Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
Luff, A. R. and Goldspink, G. 1967. Large and small muscles. Life Sci. 6: 18211826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luff, A. R. and Goldspink, G. 1970. Total number of fibres in muscles of several strains of mice. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 891893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, J. C. 1967. The effects of inbreeding on the components of litter size in mice. Genet. Res. 10: 7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrov, I. 1970. [Breed and sex differences in muscle fibre diameter and meat tenderness in pigs reared under different regimes.] Zhivot. Nauk. 7: 8398.Google Scholar