Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:39:23.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of including white clover in perennial ryegrass swards and the height of mixed swards on the milk production, sward selection and ingestive behaviour of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. C. Phillips  and
N. L. James
C. J. C. Phillips
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW
N. L. James
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted with dairy cows to examine the effects of including white clover in perennial ryegrass swards and of offering the cows a choice between tall and short mixed perennial ryegrass/white clover swards. In the first experiment, cows grazed a perennial ryegrass sward (treatment Prg); a mixed sward of perennial ryegrass and white clover (treatment WC); treatment Prg during the night and treatment WC during the day (treatment Prg night/WC day); or they were offered a choice between Prg and WC (treatment Prg/WC). Cows in treatment WC produced more milk than cows in treatment Prg, with cows in Prg night/WC day and Prg/WC intermediate. The milk fat content of cows in treatment Prg was greater than in the other three treatments. When cows were offered both mixed grass/clover and pure grass swards (treatments Prg night/WC day and Prg/WC) they exhibited a partial preference for the WC sward and grazed it to a lower herbage height than the pure grass sward. In the second experiment, cows were offered a WC sward at 6 or 3·5 cm sward surface height, or a choice between pastures at the two heights. Cows offered only the tall sward produced most milk, and those offered only the short sward produced the least. Milk fat content was reduced for cows offered only the tall sward. Cows offered a choice of the tall or short swards spent longer grazing in total than the cows offered only tall or only short swards but there was no difference in the time spent grazing the tall and short swards.

Keywords

dairy cowsherbagemilk compositionselective grazingTrifolium repens
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , October 1998 , pp. 195 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Chiy, P. C. and Phillips, C. J. C. 1996. Effects of sodium fertilizer on the chemical composition of grass and clover leaves, stems and inflorescences. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 72: 501–510.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. W. and Hall, W. B. 1969. Cyclic changeover designs. Biometrika 56: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, W. M., Hodgson, J., Arnold, G. C. and Holmes, C. W. 1997. Influence of vegetation patch selection on discriminatory grazing by dairy cows. Proceedings of the International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg, Canada, volume 1, session 5, foraging strategy, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W. and Gordon, J. 1990. Diet selection and foraging behaviour in mammalian herbivores. In Behavioural mechanisms of food selection (ed. Hughes, R. N.), NATO, ASI series, vol. 20, pp. 370–392.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1985. Genstat version 5. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. 1988. Grazing management for the dairy herd. Agriculture in Northern Ireland 2: 10–11.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1975/1976. The grassmeter. Report of the Breeding and Production Organization, 1975/6. no. 26. Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. J., Newman, J., Penning, P. D., Harvey, A. and Orr, P. J. 1994. Diet preference of sheep: effects of recent diet, physiological state and species abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H. and Lucas, H. L. 1962. Changeover designs. Technical bulletin no. 147, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Newman, J. A., Parsons, A. J., Harvey, A. and Orr, P. J. 1995a. The preference of adult sheep and goats grazing ryegrass and white clover. Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores, 1995, Clermont-Ferrand. Annales Zootechnie 44: (supplement) 113.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Parsons, A. J., Orr, R. J., Harvey, A. and Yarrow, N. H. 1995b. Dietary preference of heifers for grass or clover, with and without romensin slow-release antibloat boluses. Animal Science 60: 550 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C., James, N. and Murray-Evans, J. P. 1996. Effect of forage supplements on the incidence of bloat in dairy cows grazing a high clover pasture. Veterinary Record 139: 162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. and Leaver, J. D. 1986. The effect of forage supplementation on the behaviour of grazing dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza, F. D. and Balph, D. F. 1990. Applicability of five diet selection models to various foraging challenges ruminants encounter. In Behavioural mechanisms of food selection (ed. Hughes, R. N.), NATO, ASI series volume 20, pp. 423–459.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. L., Robinson, I. and Porter, H. D. 1980. The utilization of perennial ryegrass and white clover by lactating dairy cows. Research report 1980 of the Dairy Research Institute, Ellinbank, Victoria.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Huckle, C. A. and Penning, P. D. 1994a. Effects of sward height and concentrate supplementation on the ingestive behaviour of spring-calving dairy cows grazing grass-clover swards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, A. J., Huckle, C. A. and Wilkins, R. J. 1994b. The effects of sward height and concentrate supplementation on the performance of spring calving dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass-white clover swards. Animal Production 58: 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. 1989. Development of a legume-based dairy system. Developments in Plant and Soil Science 37: 159–167.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1978. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Austin, A. R., Siddons, R. C., Cammell, S. B., Haines, M. J., Evans, R. T. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1983. The nutrient supply to, and the milk yield and composition of, lactating cows grazing perennial ryegrass or white clover. Animal Production 36: p502 (abstr.).Google Scholar
t'Mannetje, L. and Haydock, K. P. 1963. The dry weight rank method for botanical analysis of pasture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wales, W. J., Stockdale, C. R. and Doyle, P. T. 1997. Relationships between the nutrient content of irrigated pasture on offer and that selected by grazing dairy cows. Proceedings of the International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg, Canada, volume 1, session 5, foraging strategy, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar