Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:44:33.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of hormones and diets on performance and carcass characteristics of pigs during summer and winter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

O. M. Hale  and
J. C. Johnson Jr
O. M. Hale
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton, Georgia, U.S.A.
J. C. Johnson Jr
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton, Georgia, U.S.A.
Get access

Summary

One hundred and forty-four weanling Duroc barrows were individually fed to study effects of season (summer and winter), energy concentration of the diet (high and low), protein concentration (high and low), and orally administered hormones (none, diethylstilboestrol, and mefhyltestosterone) on performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing swine.

In summer the rate of gain of pigs was 6% slower and yielded carcasses with 19% smaller loin-eye areas but 3% more lean cuts than in winter.

Pigs fed on high-energy diets gained 13% faster, consumed 8% less feed daily and required 18% less feed per unit of weight gain than pigs fed on low-energy diets. Pigs fed on high-energy diets also had a dressing percentage 2·5 units higher and yielded carcasses 2% shorter, with 15% more backfat, than those fed on low-energy diets.

Pigs fed on low-protein diets had a dressing percentage 1·6% higher and yielded carcasses with about 7% thicker backfat than pigs fed on high-protein diets. Dietary energy and protein concentrations interacted significantly in their effect on rate of gain. Pigs fed on low-energy, low-protein diets gained weight about 7% faster than pigs fed on low-energy, high-protein diets; however, pigs fed on high-energy, high-protein diets gained weight about 3% faster than pigs fed on high-energy, low-protein diets.

The only significant effect of giving each pig about 2 mg of diethylstilboestrol (DES) per day was a 2% increase in weight of lean cuts. An average daily consumption of 20 mg methyltestosterone (MT) per pig decreased rate of gain, daily feed intake, dressing percentage and backfat thickness, but increased carcass length, area of the loin-eye and weight of lean cuts. Hormones and dietary energy levels interacted in their effects on rate of gain and feed efficiency. Pigs fed on low-energy diets with or without hormones gained weight at about the same rate, but high-energy diets increased rate of gain in pigs receiving no hormone or DES by about 17% and 21%, respectively, while having no effect in pigs receiving MT. Pigs fed on low-energy diets with MT required about 7% and 6% less feed per unit of gain than pigs fed on low-energy diets without hormone or with DES, respectively; whereas pigs fed on high-energy diets containing MT required about 10% and 14% more feed per unit of gain than did pigs fed on high-energy diets without hormone or with DES, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 47 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beacom, S. E. 1963. The effect of diethylstilbestrol and estradioltestosterone implants on rate and efficiency of gain and on carcass quality of market pigs fed different finishing diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 374–384.Google Scholar
Beeson, W. M., Andrews, F. N., Perry, T. W. and Stob, M. 1955. The effect of orally administered stilbestrol and testosterone on growth and carcass composition of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratzler, L. J., Soule, R. P., Reineke, E. P. and Paul, Pauline. 1954. The effect of testosterone and castration on the growth and carcass characteristics of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 13: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, A. J., Blumer, T. N., Smart, W. W. G. and Barrick, E. R. 1962. Influence of energy-protein ratio on performance and carcass characteristics of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, R. D., Meiske, J. C., Kolari, O. E., Harvey, A. L., Aunan, W. J. and Hanson, L. E. 1967. Stilbestrol studies with beef cattle. Bull. Minn, agric. Exp. Stn No. 486.Google Scholar
Grosse, F. and Pfeiffer, H. 1963. Influence of environmental temperature on rate of gain, feed consumption and energy utilization by the pig. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 33: 1170 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hale, O. M., Johnson, J. C. and Warren, E. P. 1968. Influence of season, sex and dietary energy concentrations on performance and carcass characteristics of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 1577–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, D. W. and Coey, W. E. 1967. The effects of environmental temperature and method of feeding on the performance and carcass composition of bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 9: 209–218.Google Scholar
Pearson, A. M., Combs, G. E., Wallace, H. D., Sleeth, R. B., Stroud, J. W.Shepherd, J. M. and Koger, M. 1952. The effects of stilbestrol implants on swine of different sexes. J. Anim. Sci. 11: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, T. W., Beeson, W. M., Mohler, M., Andrews, F. N. and Stob, M. 1956. The effect of levels of orally administered methyltestosterone on growth and carcass composition of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 15: 1008–1013.Google Scholar
Sewell, R. F., Warren, E. P. and O'Mary, C. C. 1957. Effects of orally administered diethylstilbestrol and a fermentation product on growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 16: 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, E. W., Speer, V. C., Hays, V. W., Mangold, D. W. and Hazen, T. E. 1964. Effects of dietary protein level and environmental temperature on performance and carcass quality of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 375–379.Google Scholar
Sorenson, P. H. 1962. Influence of climatic environment on pig performance. In Nutrition of Pigs and Poultry (ed. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.) Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Thrasher, G. W., Perry, T. W., Andrews, F. N., Beeson, W. M. and Stob, M. 1959. The effect of estrogenic and androgenic compounds upon growth and carcass composition of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 399–409.Google Scholar
Woehling, H. L., Wilson, G. D., Grummer, R. H., Bray, R. W. and Casida, L. E. 1951. Effects of stilbestrol and testosterone pellets implanted into growing-fattening pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 10: 889–892.Google Scholar