Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:14:58.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of dietary protein and energy levels of diets offered during lactation on the lactational and subsequent reproductive performance of first-litter sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. M. Tritton ,
R. H. King ,
R. G. Campbell ,
A. C. Edwards  and
P. E. Hughes
S. M. Tritton
Affiliation:
Rhône-Poulenc Animal Nutrition, Wellington Office Centre, 2 Portrush Road, Payneham, SA 5070, Australia
R. H. King
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
R. G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Bunge Meat Industries Ltd, Redlands Road, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia
A. C. Edwards
Affiliation:
Ace Livestock Consulting Pty Ltd, PO Box 108, Cockatoo Valley, SA 5351, Australia
P. E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Forestry Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

A total of 315 first parity sows were used in two experiments to establish the lactational and subsequent reproductive performance of first-litter sows in response to varying levels of dietary amino acids and digestible energy (DE) offered during lactation. In the first experiment, sows were offered five diets ranging in lysine content from 6·2 to 15·1 g/kg. In the second experiment sows were offered five diets with a similar lysine: DE ratio (0·88 to 0·85 g/MJ) but ranging in DE content from 12·6 to 15·1 MJ/kg. Voluntary food intake during lactation was unaffected by lysine or DE content of the diets. Piglet pre-weaning growth was similarly unaffected by dietary DE content but responded in a curvilinear manner with increasing dietary lysine. Sow body-weight loss during lactation was unaffected by dietary lysine but declined with increasing DE content up to 13·8 MJ/kg. Backfat loss was lowest for sows offered the lowest lysine diet and tended to reach a plateau at a dietary level of 10·6 g lysine per kg. In response to dietary DE content, backfat loss tended to be highest for sows offered the diet of lowest DE content and declined with increasing DE content up to 15·1 MJ DE per kg. The subsequent weaning to remating interval was unaffected by dietary DE content. Subsequent litter size was similarly unaffected by dietary DE content but was significantly higher for sows offered the two higher, compared with the two lower, lysine diets (10·7 v. 9·6 born alive, s.e.d. 0·5, P < 0·05). The results suggest that current amino acid recommendations for lactating first-litter sows are inappropriate and may be constraining both milk production and subsequent reproductive performance.

Keywords

digestible energylactationlysinesows
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 573 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Clowes, E. J., Aherne, F. X. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1994. Effect of delayed breeding on the endocrinology and fecundity of sows. Journal of Animal Science 72:283–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etienne, M., Noblet, J., Dourmad, J. Y. and Fortune, H. 1989. Etude du besoinen lysine des truies en lactation. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 21:101–108.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. V. and Edwards, S. A. 1987. Effect of lactational and post-weaning feeding on the reproductive performance of primiparous sows. Animal Production 44:464 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. 1989. Nutrition reproduction interactions in the breeding sow: conclusions. In Manipulating pig production ll (ed. Barnett, J. L. and Hennessy, D. P.), pp.296–301. Australian Pig Science Association.Google Scholar
Johnston, L. J., Pettigrew, J. E. and Rust, J. W. 1993. Response of maternal-line sows to dietary protein concentration during lactation. journal of Animal Science 71:2151–2156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, R. H. 1987. Nutritional anoestrus in young sows. Pig News and Information 8:15–22.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1991. Nutrition of sows during lactation. Proceedings of the fifty-second Minnesota nutrition conference, September 16-18, pp.154–162. Bloomington MN.Google Scholar
King, R. H. and Dunkin, A. C. 1986. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 4. The relative effects of energy and protein intakes during lactation on the performance of sows and their piglets. Animal Production 43:319–325.Google Scholar
King, R. H., Toner, M. S. and Dove, H. 1989. Pattern of milk production in sows. In Manipulating pig production II (ed. Barnett, J. L. and Hennessy, D. P.), p.98 (abstr.). Australian Pig Science Association.Google Scholar
King, R. H., Toner, M. S., Dove, H., Atwood, C. S. and Brown, W. G. 1993. The response of first-litter sows to dietary protein level during lactation. journal of Animal Science 71:2457–2463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, R. H., Williams, I. H. and Barker, I. 1984. The effect of diet during lactation on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15:412–415.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N., Mitaru, B. N., Gooneratne, A. D., Blair, R. and Thacker, P. A. 1988. The influence of dietary energy intake during successive lactations on sow prolificacy. Canadian journal of Animal Science 68:283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koketsu, Y., Dial, G., Pettigrew, J., Marsh, W. and Ruen, P. 1991. Pattern of feed intake durin g lactation in commercial swine herds. In Recent advances in swine production and health, vol. I, pp.49–57. University of Minnesota Swine Centre.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1977. Genstat V, mark 4.01 Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C. and Mangan, L. T. 1975. Evaluation of various protein sequences on the nutritional carry-over from gestation to lactation with first-litter sows. journal of Nutrition 105:1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Grady, J. F. 1971. Level and source of protein in the diets of lactating sows. Irish journal of Agricultural Research 10:17–29.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F. and Hanrahan, T. J. 1975. Influence of protein level and amino acid supplementation of diets fed in lactation on the performance of sows and their litters. 1. Sow and litter performance. Irish journal of Agricultural Research 14:127–135.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F. and Lynch, P. B. 1978. Voluntary feed intake by lactating sows: influence of system of feeding and nutrient density of the diet. Irish journal of Agricultural Research 14:127–135.Google Scholar
Petchey, A. M. and Jolly, G. M. 1979. Sow service in lactation: an analysis of data from one herd. Animal Production 29:183–191.Google Scholar
Sauber, T. E., Stahly, T. S., Ewan, R. C. and Williams, N. H. 1993. Impact of lean growth genotype and dietary amino acid intake on lactational performance of sows nursing large litters. 1993 Swine research report Iowa State University, pp.31–34. Iowa.Google Scholar
Stahly, T. S., Cromwell, G. L. and Monegue, H. J. 1990. Lactational responses of sows nursing large litters to dietary lysine levels. journal of Animal Science 68(suppl. 1):369 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture. 1987. Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Pigs. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia).Google Scholar
Tokach, M. D., Pettigrew, J. E., Crooker, B. A., Dial, G. D. and Sower, A. F. 1992. Quantitative influence of lysine and energy intake on yield of milk components in the primiparous sow. journal of Animal Science 70:1864–1872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed