Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:25:47.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pasture crude protein and fermentable energy supplementation on blood metabolite and progesterone concentrations and on embryo survival in heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

D.A. Kenny ,
M.P. Boland ,
M.G. Diskin  and
J.M. Sreenan
D.A. Kenny
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Research Centre, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Ireland Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
M.P. Boland
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Ireland Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
M.G. Diskin
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Research Centre, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland
J.M. Sreenan*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Research Centre, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland
*
†Corresponding author: e-mail[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Seasonal milk production systems rely on heavy inputs of nitrogenous fertilizer, which typically generate pastures with a high crude protein (CP) and low fermentable energy concentration. High intake of CP, particularly in association with low rumen fermentable energy, increases systemic ammonia and urea and has been associated with reduced fertility in cattle. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between pasture protein intake and fermentable energy supplementation on a range of blood metabolites and on embryo survival and development in cattle.

Oestrous synchronized, nulliparous beef heifers (no. = 175) were randomly assigned to one of four pasture-based dietary treatments in a 2 ✕ 2 factorial study carried out over 2 years. Animals were randomly allocated to either high (85 kg nitrogen (N) per ha; HN) or low (0·0 kg N per ha; LN) N fertilized pastures and within pasture treatment were randomly allocated to receive either zero or three (+3P) kg dry matter (DM) of molassed sugar-beet pulp (MSBP) per head per day as follows: (1) HN (no. = 44), (2) HN + 3P, (no. = 43), (3) LN (no. = 44), (4) LN + 3P (no. = 44). Blood samples were collected to measure systemic concentrations of ammonia, urea, insulin, glucose and progesterone. Heifers were artificially inseminated (AI) and pregnancy diagnosis was carried out by ultrasonography 30 days after AI. Subgroups of pregnant animals across treatments were slaughtered 40 days after AI to estimate conceptus development.

The HN pasture had a higher CP (P < 0·001) and lower water-soluble carbohydrate (P < 0·01) concentration. Plasma concentrations of ammonia (P < 0·05) and urea (P < 0·001) were higher in the animals on the HN pastures and were reduced (P < 0·05) by MSBP supplementation, but only in animals on the HN pastures. Embryo survival rate across treatments was high overall (71%) and not related to pasture CP concentration, fermentable energy supplementation or systemic concentrations of ammonia, urea, glucose or insulin. There was no relationship between dietary treatment or systemic metabolites and any of the estimates of conceptus development. Systemic insulin was not affected by pasture N treatment or MSBP supplementation (P > 0·05). Systemic concentrations of glucose were not affected by pasture N treatment (P > 0·05) but were increased by MSBP supplementation (P < 0·05). Systemic progesterone was not affected by pasture CP or MSBP supplementation (P > 0·05) but at day 7 after AI was positively related (P < 0·05) to embryo survival. Intake of high CP herbage elevated systemic ammonia and urea but there was no association with embryo survival rate or embryo development in heifers.

Keywords

cattleembryo mortalityproteinurea.
Type
Reproduction
Information
Animal Science , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , December 2001 , pp. 501 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, B. A., Rosario, H. A., Anderson, G. W., Grindle, B. P. and Carroll, D. J. 1996. Effects of dietary crude protein, breed, parity, and health status on the fertility of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 2225–2236.Google Scholar
Beam, S. W. and Butler, W. R. 1999. Energy balance effects on follicular development and first ovulation in post-partum cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 54: 411–424.Google Scholar
Berardinelli, J. G., Weng, J., Burfening, P. J. and Adair, R. 2001. Effect of excess degradable intake protein on early embryonic development, ovarian steroids, and blood urea nitrogen on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the estrous cycle in mature ewes. Journal of Animal Science 79: 193–199.Google Scholar
Blauweikel, R. and Kincaid, R. L. 1986. Effect of crude protein and solubility on performance and blood constituents of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2091–2098.Google Scholar
Birch, G. G. and Mwangelwa, O. M. 1974. Calorimetric determination of sugars in sweetened condensed milk products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25: 1355–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckental, I., Holtzman, M., Kaim, M., Aharoni, Y., Zamwell, S., Voet, H. and Arieli, A. 2000. Effect of amount of undegradable crude protein in the diets of high yielding dairy cows on energy balance and reproduction. Livestock Production Science 63: 131–140.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R. 1998. Review: effect of protein nutrition on ovarian and uterine physiology in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2533–2539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, W. R. 2000. Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 60-61: 449–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, W. R. 2001. Nutritional effects on resumption of ovarian cyclicity and conception rate in postpartum dairy cows. In Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow (ed. Diskin, M.) British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 26, vol. 1, pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R., Calaman, J. J. and Beam, S. W. 1996. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 74: 858–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canfield, R. W., Sniffen, C. J. and Butler, R. W. 1990. Effects of excess degradable protein on postpartum reproduction and energy balance in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 2342–2349.Google Scholar
Carroll, D. J., Barton, B. A., Anderson, G. W. and Smith, R. D. 1988. Influence of protein intake and feeding strategy on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3470–3481.Google Scholar
Dunne, L. D., Diskin, M. G., Boland, M. P., O’Farrell, K. J. and Sreenan, J. M. 1999. The effect of pre- and postinsemination plane of nutrition on embryo survival in beef heifers. Animal Science 69: 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elrod, C. C., Amburgh, M. van and Butler, W. R. 1993. Alterations of pH in response to increased dietary protein in cattle are unique to the uterus. Journal of Animal Science 71: 702–706.Google Scholar
Elrod, C. C. and Butler, W. R. 1993. Reduction of fertility and alteration of uterine pH in heifers fed excess ruminally degradable protein. Journal of Animal Science 71: 694–701.Google Scholar
Fahey, J., Boland, M. P. and O’Callaghan, D. 2001. The effects of dietary urea on embryo development in superovulated donor ewes and on early embryo survival and development in recipient ewes. Animal Science 72: 395–400.Google Scholar
Garcia-Bojalil, C.M, Staples, C. R., Thatcher, W. W. and Drost, M. 1994. Protein intake and development of ovarian follicles and embryos of superovulated non-lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2537–2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gath, V. P., Lonergan, P., Boland, M. P. and O’Callaghan, D. 1999. Effect of diet type on establishment of pregnancy and embryo development in heifers. Theriogenology 51: 224 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Hammon, D. S., Wang, S. and Holyoak, G. R. 2000a. Ammonia concentration in bovine follicular fluid and its effect during in vitro maturation on subsequent embryo development. Animal Reproduction Science 58: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammon, D. S., Wang, S. and Holyoak, G. R. 2000b. Effects of ammonia during different stages of culture on development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Animal Reproduction Science 59: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, H. J., Aalseth, E. P., Adams, G. D. and Bush, L. J. 1987. Influence of dietary protein on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 1563–1571.Google Scholar
Huntington, G. B. and Archibeque, S. L. 1999. Practical aspects of urea and ammonia metabolism in ruminants. In Proceedings of the American Society of Animal Science, 1999. Available at: http: //www. asas. org/jas/symposia/ proceedings/0939. pdf.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. R., Chapman, T. E., Holtan, D. W. and Swanson, L. V. 1983. Relationship of dietary crude protein to composition of uterine secretions and blood in high-producing postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 1854–1862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, D. A., Boland, M. P., Diskin, M. G. and Sreenan, J. M. 2001. The effect of protein and fermentable carbohydrate intake on blood metabolite concentrations and fertility in beef heifers. In Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow (ed. Diskin, M.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 26 vol. 2, pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
Kolver, E., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Cassidy, T. J. 1998. Synchronization of ruminal degradation of supplemental carbohydrate with pasture nitrogen in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2017–2028.Google Scholar
Laven, R. A. and Drew, S. B. 1999. Dietary protein and the reproductive performance of cows. Veterinary Record 145: 687–695.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. In Condition scoring of cattle, revised edition. East of Scotland College of Agriculture bulletin no. 6.Google Scholar
McEvoy, T., Robinson, J., Aitken, R., Findlay, P. and Robertson, I. 1997. Dietary excesses of urea influence the viability and metabolism of preimplantation sheep embryos and may affect fetal growth among survivors. Animal Reproduction Science 47: 71–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeilly, A. S. and Fraser, H. M. 1987. Effect of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-induced suppression of LH and FSH on follicle growth and corpus luteum function in the ewe. Journal of Endocrinology 115: 273–282.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Reference book 443. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Peyraud, J. L. and Astigarraga, L. 1998. Review of the effect of nitrogen fertilization on the chemical composition, intake, digestion and nutritive value of fresh herbage: consequences on animal nutrition and N balance. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72: 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, M. D., Darwash, A. O., Flint, A. P. F., Webb, R., Woolliams, J. A. and Lamming, G. E. 2000. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70: 487–501.Google Scholar
Sinclair, K. D., Sinclair, L. A. and Robinson, J. J. 2000a. Nitrogen metabolism and fertility in cattle. I. Adaptive changes in intake and metabolism to diets differing in their rate of energy and nitrogen release in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 78: 2659–2669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, K. D., Sinclair, L. A. and Robinson, J. J. 2000b. Nitrogen metabolism and fertility in cattle. II. Development of oocytes recovered from heifers offered diets differing in their rate of nitrogen release in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 78: 2670–2680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stakelum, G. K., Dillon, P. and Murphy, J. J. 1988. The effect of concentrate type on the rumen fermentation patterns of grass fed cows and dry matter and crude protein digestibility of the herbage. In Proceedings of the 12th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Dublin, Ireland. Irish Grassland Association, Belclare, Tuam, Co. Galway, Ireland.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 6·03 edition. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 17: 104–111.Google Scholar
Tindal, J. S., Knaggs, G. S., Hart, I. C. and Blake, L. A. 1978. Release of growth hormone in lactating and non-lactating goats in relation to behaviour, stages of sleep, electroencephalograms, environmental stimuli and levels of prolactin, insulin, glucose and free fatty acids in the circulation. Journal of Endocrinology 76: 333–346.Google Scholar
Trevaskis, L. M. and Fulkerson, W. J. 1999. The relationship between various animal and management factors and milk urea, and its association with reproductive performance of dairy cows grazing pasture. Livestock Production Science 57: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valk, H., Leusink-Kappers, I.E. and Vuuren, A. M.van. 2000. Effect of reducing nitrogen fertiliser on grassland on grass intake, digestibility and milk production of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 63: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visek, W. J. 1984. Ammonia: its effects on biological systems, metabolic hormones and reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 481–498.Google Scholar
Vuuren, A. M. van, Koelen, C. J. van der and Vroons de Bruin, J. 1986. Influence of level and composition of concentrate supplements on rumen fermentation patterns of grazing dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 34: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuuren, A. M. van, Tamminga, S. and Ketelaar, R. S. 1991. In sacco degradation of organic matter and crude protein of fresh herbage (Lolium perenne) in the rumen of grazing cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116: 429.Google Scholar