Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:46:08.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of oestrous cycle number, at constant age, on gilt reproduction in a dynamic service system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

D. F. Grigoriadis ,
S. A. Edwards ,
P. R. English  and
F. Davidson
D. F. Grigoriadis
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, 581 King Street, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, 581 King Street, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK
P. R. English
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, 581 King Street, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK
F. Davidson
Affiliation:
ScotPig Ltd, Mains of Bogfechel, Whiterashes, Aberdeenshire AB2 0QU, UK
Get access

Abstract

Previous studies examining the effect of age on gilt reproduction have generally failed to discriminate between chronological (i.e. days) and physiological age (i.e. number of oestrous cycles experienced) and the importance of each factor remains unclear in the pig. The present investigation tested the hypothesis that the physiological age at which gilts are bred in a dynamic service system (DSS) affects their reproductive behaviour and performance. A hundred and ninety gilts were randomly allocated between two treatments. They were introduced into the service pens of a DSS to be bred at the same age (215 days) but either at second (2H; no. = 96) or third (3H;no. = 94) post-pubertal heat period. The sexual behaviour of half of them was continuously recorded over a 13-week period and reproductive data from all the gilts were collected. Gilts of 2H treatment were significantly heavier at entry into the service pens (123 v. 119 kg; P < 0·05) than 3H gilts, but there was no significant difference in their backfat thickness. Treatment failed to affect the quality and frequency of mating attempts (MAs) gilts received or oestrus duration. Conception rate to first oestrus in the DSS (82%) was not affected by treatment. Litter size and number of piglets born alive was similar for 3H and 2H gilts (12·0 v. 11·7, s.e.d. 0·40 and 11·5 v. 11·0, s.e.d. 0·4 respectively; all P > 0·05). It is concluded that the reproductive behaviour and performance of gilts that had experienced either two or three oestrous cycles prior to mating at a constant age does not differ significantly in a DSS. More studies are needed in order to clarify the possible interactive influence of repeated and frequent services, which are common in a DSS, on gilt reproduction.

Keywords

giltslitter sizematingoestrussexual behaviour
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibong, A. E., England, D. C. and Stormshack, F. 1987. Factors contributing to early embryonic mortality in gilts bred at first oestrus. Journal of Animal Science 64: 474–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibong, A. E., Maurer, R. R., England, D. C. and Stormshack, F. 1992. Influence of sexual maturity of donors on in vivo survival of transferred porcine embryos. Biology of Reproduction 47: 1026–1030.Google Scholar
Britt, J. H., Day, B. N., Webel, S. K. and Brauer, M. A. 1989. Induction of fertile estrus in prepubertal gilts by treatment with a combination of pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1148–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. H. 1982. The gilt for breeding and for meat. In Control of pig reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 211–224. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1973. Meat production from pigs which have farrowed. Animal Production 17: 305–315.Google Scholar
Challinor, C. M., Dams, G., Edwards, B. and Close, W. H. 1996. The effect of body condition of gilts at first mating on long-term sow productivity. Animal Science 62: 660 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Clark, L. K. and Leman, A. D. 1986. Factors influencing litter size in pigs. Part 1. Pig News and Information 7: 303–310.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A. 1998. Nutrition of the rearing gilt and sow. In Progress in pig science (ed. Wiseman, J., Varley, M. A. and Chadwick, J. P.), pp. 361–382. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Fabre-Nys, C., Poindron, P. and Signoret, J. P. 1993. Reproductive behaviour. In Reproduction in domesticated animals (ed. King, G. J.), pp. 147–194. Elsevier Science Publishers, BV. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Flowers, W. L. and Alhusen, H. D. 1992. Reproductive performance and estimates of labour requirements associated with combinations of artificial insemination and natural service. Journal of Animal Science 70: 615–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flowers, W. L. and Esbenshade, K. L. 1993. Optimizing management of natural and artificial matings in swine. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 48: 217–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, I. 1997. Controlled reproduction in pigs. CAB International, University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grigoriadis, D. F., Edwards, S. A., English, P. R. and Davidson, F. 2000. The reproductive behaviour of pigs in a dynamic service system for gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 203–216.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. 1987. Reproductive behaviour. In Reproduction in farm animals, fifth edition (ed. S. E. Hafez, E.), pp. 260–294. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Holtz, W., Schmidt-Baulain, R., Welp, C. and Wallenhorst, Chr. K. 1999. Effect of insemination of estrus-induced prepubertal gilts on ensuing reproductive performance and body weight. Animal Reproduction Science 57: 177–183.Google Scholar
Koenig, J. L. F. and Stormshak, F. 1993. Cytogenetic evaluation of ova from pubertal and third-estrus gilts. Biology of Reproduction 49: 1158–1162.Google Scholar
MacPherson, R. M., Hovell, F. D. DeB. and Jones, A. S. 1977. Performance of sows first mated at puberty or second or third oestrus, and carcass assessment of once-bred gilts. Animal Production 24: 333–342.Google Scholar
Menino, A. R., Archibong, A. E., Li, J.-R., Stormshak, F. and England, D. C. 1989. Comparison of in vitro development of embryos collected from the same gilts at first and third estrus. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1387–1393.Google Scholar
MINITAB. 1998. MINITAB reference manual (release 12). MINITAB Inc., USA.Google Scholar
O’Grady, J. F., Lynch, P. B. and Kearney, P. A. 1983. Mating management of sows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 11–19.Google Scholar
Rozeboom, D. W., Petigrew, J. E., Moser, R. L., Cornelius, S. G. and El Kandelgy, S. M. 1996. Influence of gilt age and body composition at first breeding on sow reproductive performance and longevity. Journal of Animal Science 74: 138–150.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P. 1970. Reproductive behaviour of pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 11: 105–117.Google Scholar
Steverink, D. W. B., Soede, N. M., Groenland, G. J. R., Schie, F. W. van, Noordhuizen, J. P. T. M. and Kemp, B. 1999. Duration of estrus in relation to reproduction results in pigs on commercial farms. Journal of Animal Science 77: 801–809.Google Scholar
Swiestra, E. E. and Rahnefeld, G. W. 1972. Effects of cold stress and repeat mating on reproductive performance of swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 52: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilton, J. E. and Cole, D. J. A. 1982. Effect of triple versus double mating on sow productivity. Animal Production 34: 279–282.Google Scholar
Warnick, A. C., Wiggins, E. L. and Casida, L. E. 1951. Variation in puberty phenomena in inbred gilts. Journal of Animal Science 10: 479–493.Google Scholar
Xue, J. L., Dial, G. D., Trigg, T., Davies, P. and King, V. L. 1998. Influence of mating frequency on sow reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2962–2966.Google Scholar
Young, L. G., King, G. J., Walton, J. S., McMillan, I. and Klevorick, M. 1990a. Age, weight, backfat and time of mating effects on performance of gilts. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70: 469–481.Google Scholar
Young, L. G., King, G. J., Walton, J. S., McMillan, I. and Klevorick, M. 1990b. Reproductive performance over four parities of gilts stimulated to early estrus and mated at first, second or third observed estrus. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70: 483–492.Google Scholar