Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:21:58.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of monensin supplementation on growth, feed digestibility and utilization in young calves†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Ilan ,
A. Ben-Asher ,
Z. Holzer ,
Z. Nitsan ,
I. Nir  and
D. Levy
D. Ilan
Affiliation:
Extension Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Tel-Aviv, Israel
A. Ben-Asher
Affiliation:
Extension Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan, Israel
Z. Nitsan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan, Israel
I. Nir
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan, Israel
D. Levy
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Two feeding trials were carried out with Israeli Friesian male calves, commencing at an average age of 7 to 10 days, and covering a suckling period of 30 days followed by a further 90 days. A conventional starter, or one that contained cotton hulls, was used. In each experiment one group of 10 animals served as a control and a similar group was monensin-supplemented. No coccidia were found in the animals. In experiments 1 and 2 monensin supplementation was associated with increased daily gains of 10% and 47% during the suckling period and of 6% and 17% during the next 90 days, but only the differences obtained in experiment 2 were significant. In both experiments, dry-matter intake relative to body weight was higher with monensin supplementation in period 1, but reduced in period 2. The effect of monensin on molar proportions of acetic and propionic acids was smaller than that reported by previous authors for older cattle.

A separate digestibility trial showed that monensin administered to suckling calves, either with milk replacer or directly into the rumen, improved dry-matter digestibility, increased the excretion of amylase, and tended to reduce that of trypsin and chymotrypsin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 125 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergstrom, R. C. and Maki, L. R. 1974. Effect of monensin in young crossbred lambs with naturally occurring coccidiosis. J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 165: 288–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Boling, J. A., Bradley, N. W. and Campbell, L. D. 1977. Monensin levels for growing and finishing steers. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 867–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, W. M., Hill, C. H. and Barber, C. W. 1964. A mechanism of interaction between dietary protein levels and coccidiosis in chicks. J. Nutr. 82: 306–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calhoun, M. C., Carroll, L. H., Livingstone, C. W. Jr and Shelton, M. 1979. Effect of dietary monensin on coccidial oocyst numbers, feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, B. G. and Boucque, C. V. 1968. Rapid method for the gas-chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. J. agric. Fd Chem. 16: 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestrin-lerner, S. and BEN-YONAH, S. 1963. Routine determination of blood glucose with glucose oxidase. Bull. Res. Court. Israel 10E: 188–191.Google Scholar
Holzer, Z., Ilan, D. and Levy, D. 1979. A note on the effects of monensin on the performance and on rumen metabolites of intact male cattle. Anim. Prod. 28: 135–137.Google Scholar
Lemenager, R. P., Owens, F. N., Lusby, K. S. and Totusek, R. 1978. Monensin, forage intake and lactation of range beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Ilan, D. 1979. Monensin supplementation of young Israeli Friesian male cattle. Anim. Prod. 29: 305–310.Google Scholar
Miller, W. J., Martin, Y. G. and Fowler, P. R. 1969. Effects of addition of fiber to simplified and to complex starters fed to young dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 672–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. 1976. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 4, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 5th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nitsan, Z. and Nir, I. 1977. A comparative study of the nutritional and physiological significance of raw and heated soya beans in chicks and goslings. Br. J. Nutr. 37: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, T. W., Beeson, W. M. and Mohler, M. T. 1976. Effect of monensin on beef cattle performance. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prange, R. W., Davis, C. L. and Clark, J. H. 1978. Propionate production in the rumen of Holstein steers fed either a control or monensin supplemented diet. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1120–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, A. P., Cooley, C. O., Potter, E. L., Rathmacher, R. P. and Richardson, L. F. 1976. Effect of monensin on feed efficiency of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 670–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de kamer, J. H., Huinink, H. Ten B. and Weyers, H. A. 1949. Rapid method for the determination of fat in feces. J. biol. Chem. 177: 347–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Horn, H. H., Olayiwole, M. B., Wilcox, C. J., Harris, B. Jr and Wing, J. M. 1976. Effects of housing, milk feeding management, and ration formulation on calf growth and feed intake. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 924–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar