Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:25:48.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of intermittent light regimens on the performance of intact male turkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. D. Lewis ,
G. C. Perry  and
C. M. Sherwin
P. D. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
G. C. Perry
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
C. M. Sherwin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
Get access

Abstract

An 8-h photoperiod, compared with 12-, 16- or 23-h photoperiods, has been shown to reduce the incidence of injurious pecking and leg problems in intact male turkeys but to result in lower body weights, slower sexual development and less efficient food conversion. The effect of 8 h of illumination given as a solid photoperiod, as eight 1-h periods equally spread through the 24 h or concentrated into a 12-h part of the day on the performance of BUT 8 intact male turkeys was investigated.

Fragmentation of the daily illumination increased body weight, improved food conversion efficiency but did not significantly affect food intake. Increased sexual displaying and significantly better food conversion between 16 and 20 weeks by the two intermittently illuminated groups strongly suggested that both regimens were interpreted as stimulatory daylengths. Generally, losses due to mortality and culling were higher in both fragmented groups, while injurious pecking was higher in 8(1L: ID) birds before 5 weeks and in birds given a 12-h ‘subjective day’ after 5 weeks than in 8-h controls. Culling due to leg problems was significantly higher in birds on the 8(1L:2D) regimen but the incidence of leg imperfections was minimal (< 0·037) in all groups. Both intermittent groups but the 8(1L: 2D) in particular, showed a reduced response to hand movement across the eyes compared with 8-h controls. The controls ate proportionately more food during their 16-h dark period than did the intermittent group during their 12-h ‘subjective night’, though both groups increased their ‘nocturnal’ feeding with age.

Keywords

behaviourlight regimeperformancephotoperiodturkeys
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , December 1998 , pp. 627 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, W. L. G., Pattison, M. and Barnett, K. C. 1973. Light-induced eye abnormalities in turkeys and the turkey blindness syndrome. Research in Veterinary Science. 14: 42–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, K. C., Ashton, W. I. G., Holford, G., Macpherson, I. and Simm, P. D. 1971. Chorioretinitis and buphthalmos in turkeys. The Veterinary Record. 88: 620–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, R. W. and El Halawani, M. E. 1979. The effects of light intensity on growth of market turkeys reared on intermittent light. Poultry Science 58: 1036 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Boa-Amponsem, K., O'Sullivan, T. W., Douglas, J. H., Robeson, L. G. and Baier, J. G. 1991. Genotype, feeding program and diet interactions in meat chickens. 3. General fitness. Poultry Science 68: (suppl. 1) 697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, R. B. 1975. The effect of intermittent lighting programmes on the production of market chickens and turkeys. World's Poultry Science Journal. 31: 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, R. B., Bernon, D. E. and Goldrosen, A. 1976. Effects of four lighting regimes on broiler performance, leg abnormalities and plasma corticoid levels. Poultry Science. 55: 1072–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, R. B., Hill, A. T. and Bernon, D. E. 1973. Effects of four lighting regimes on the performance of broilers and roasters. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 53: 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, R. B., Supeene, N. J. and Bernon, D. E. 1974. Comparison of intermittent lighting programs with other lighting programs for producing both broiler and heavy turkeys. Proceedings of the XV World's Poultry Congress pp. 425–427.Google Scholar
Buyse, J. and Decuypere, E. 1988. The influence of intermittent light on broiler performance and on patterns of feed intake. In Leanness of domestic birds, genetic, and hormonal aspects (ed. Leclerq, B. and Whitehead, C. C.), pp. 133–134. Butterworths-INRA, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, P. and Barwick, M. W. 1962. The effect of light on broiler growth. II. Light patterns. British Poultry Science 3: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, H. L. 1992. Management factors in leg disorders. In Bone biology and skeletal disorders in poultry (ed. Whitehead, C. C.), pp. 195–211. Carfax, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D. L., Buhr, R. J. and Mamputu, M. 1992. Beak trimming and sex effects on behavior and performance traits of Large White turkeys. Poultry Science. 71: 1606–1614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, G. S., Siopes, T. D., Peiffer, R. L. and Cook, C. 1986. Morphologic changes induced by photoperiod in eyes of turkey poults. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 953–955.Google ScholarPubMed
Denbow, D. M., Leighton, A. T. Jr and Hulet, R. M. 1984. Behaviour and growth parameters of Large White turkeys as affected by floor space and beak trimming. 1. Males. Poultry Science 63: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1995. Report on the welfare turkeys, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Gill, D. J. and Leighton, A. T. Jr 1984. Effects of light environment and population density on growth performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science. 63: 1314–1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, D. J. and Leighton, A. T. Jr 1988. Effects of light environment and population density on growth performance of male turkeys. 2. Physiological changes. Poultry Science 67: 1518–1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halvorson, J. C., Waibel, P. E., Oju, E. M., Noll, S. L. and El Halawani, M. E. 1991. Effect of diet and population density on male turkeys under various environmental conditions. 2. Body composition and meat yield. Poultry Science. 70: 935–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, P. Y. and Kohl, H. 1989. Effect of intermittent lighting and time of hatch on large Broad-Breasted White turkeys. Poultry Science. 68: 528–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulan, H. W., Proudfoot, F. G. and McRae, K. B. 1980. The nutritional value of Tower and Candle rapeseed meals for turkey broilers housed under different lighting conditions. Poultry Science 59: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketelaars, E. H., Verbrugge, M., Hel, W. van der, Linden, J. M. van de and Verstegen, M. W. A. 1986. Effect of intermittent lighting on performance and energy metabolism of broilers. Poultry Science. 65: 2208–2213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leighton, A. T. and Mason, J. P. 1976. Environmental factors affecting growth performance of turkeys. American Society Agricultural Engineers, paper no. 76–4508.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. D. 1987. Responses of laying hens to interrupted lighting regimes. Ph.D. thesis. University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. D., Perry, G. C. and Sherwin, C. M. 1998. Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on the performance of intact male turkeys. Animal Science. 66: 759–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T. R. 1967. Light requirement of the fowl. In Environmental control in poultry production (ed. Carter, T. C.) pp. 15–39. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Murthy, G. P. K., Rajalakshmi, R. and Ramakrishnan, C. V. 1986. Developmental pattern of alkaline phosphatase i n soluble and particulate fractions of rat skull cap and femur. Calcified Tissue International. 39: 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbrey, J. W., Baksi, S. N., Dhillon, A. S., Zimmerman, N. G., Truitt, S. G. and Riedinger, R. 1988. Histomorphometry and vitamin D metabolism of valgus-varus deformity in broiler chickens. Avian Disease 32: 704–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noll, S. L., El Halawani, M. E., Waibel, P. E., Redig, P. and Janni, K. 1991. Effect of diet and population density on male turkeys under various environmental conditions. 1. Turkey growth and health performance. Poultry Science. 70: 923–934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, A. W., Miller, B. E. and Putkey, J. A. 1980. Evaluation of the diurnal production of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D's effects on intestinal membrane organization. Progress in Biochemical Pharmacology. 17: 160–167.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. E., Classen, H. L., Hanson, J. A. and Onderka, D. K. 1992. Growth performance, feed efficiency and the incidence of skeletal and metabolic disease in full-fed and feed restricted broiler and roaster chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 1: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, C. J. 1977. What lighting for broiler production? World's Poultry Science Journal. 33: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoffner, R. N., Polley, C. R., Burger, R. E. and Johnson, E. L. 1962. Light regulation in turkey management. 1. Effect on body weight. Poultry Science. 41: 1560–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P. C. M. 1986. The incidence of leg problems in broilers as influenced by management. Proceedings of the seventh European poultry conference, Paris, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D. 1983. Effect of intermittent lighting on energy savings and semen characteristics of breeder torn turkeys. Poultry Science 62: 2265–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siopes, T. D., Baughman, G. R., Parkhurst, C. R. and Timmons, M. B. 1989. Relationship between duration and intensity of environmental light on the growth performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science. 68: 1428–1435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siopes, T. D., Parkhurst, C. R. and Baughman, G. R. 1986. Intermittent light and growth performance of male turkeys from 2 to 22 weeks of age. Poultry Science. 65: 2221–2225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siopes, T. D., Timmons, M. B., Baughman, G. R. and Parkhurst, C. R. 1983. The effect of light intensity on turkey poult eye morphology. Poultry Science. 62: 2486–2488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. L., Weaver, W. D. Jr, Beane, W. L. and Cherry, J. A. 1984. Effects of light and feeding space on leg abnormalities in broilers. Poultry Science. 63: 565–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed