Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:46:41.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of food intake in the rearing period on the reproductive performance of heavy and light gilts from large litters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. B. Ogle  and
Anne-Marie Dalin
R. B. Ogle
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-75-007 Uppsala, Sweden
Anne-Marie Dalin
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-75-007 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Sixty crossbred gilts, comprising 15 groups of four littermates from large litters (> 12 pigs) were used. The experiment was designed as a 2 × 2 factorial, with two initial live weights (light (L) or heavy (H)) and either a low (lp) or high (hp) plane of feeding during the rearing period and post mating within each litter group. The hp gilts were significantly heavier (P < 0·001) and had thicker backfat (P < 0·001) than the lp gilts at first oestrus. The Hhp gilts reached puberty 26·4 days earlier than the Hip gilts (P < 0·05). Level of food intake significantly influenced ovulation rates and total embryo numbers, the hp gilts shedding on average 2·4 more ova and having 1·9 more embryos than the lp gilts 28 to 35 days post mating (P < 0·05). However, due to somewhat higher embryonic mortality in the hp gilts, the mean number of live embryos was not significantly higher than for the lp gilts (P < 0·05).

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 305 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersson, A-M., Einarsson, S. and Karlbom, I. 1982. A study on the occurrence of silent and/or anovulatory heats in peripubertal gilts. Proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Congress, Mexico, p. 236.Google Scholar
Bosu, W. T. K., Edqvist, L-E., Lindberg, P., Martinsson, K. and Johansson, E. D. B. 1976. The effect of various dosages of lynestrenol on the plasma levels of oestrogen and progesterone during the menstrual cycle in the rhesus monkey. Contraception 13: 677–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyck, G. W. and Strain, J. H. 1983. Postmating feeding level effects on conception rate and embryonic survival in gilts. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63: 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, M., Camous, S. and Cuvillier, A. 1983. Effect of feed restrictions during growth on puberty and reproductive performance in gilts. Reproduction, Nutrition, Developpement 23: 309–319.Google Scholar
Hartog, L. A. den and Kempen, G. J. M. van. 1980. Relation between nutrition and fertility in pigs. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 28: 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, K. 1981. Some notes concerning the genetic possibilities of improving sow fertility. Livestock Production Science 8: 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, R. M., Hovell, F. D. DeB and Jones, A. S. 1977. Performance of sows first mated at puberty or second or third oestrus, and carcass assessment of once-bred gilts. Animal Production 24: 333–342.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. E. and Robison, O. W. 1976. Effects of postnatal maternal environment on reproduction in gilts. Journal of Animal Science 43: 71–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revelle, T. J. and Robison, O. W. 1973. An explanation for the low heritability of litter size in swine. Journal of Animal Science 37: 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, O. W. 1981. The influence of maternal effects on the efficiency of selection; a review. Livestock Production Science 8: 121–137.Google Scholar
Rutledge, J. J. 1980. Fraternity size and swine reproduction. 1. Effect on fecundity of gilts. Journal of Animal Science 51: 868–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1982. SAS Users Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Wrathall, A. E. 1971. Prenatal survival in pigs. Part 1. Ovulation rate and its influence on prenatal survival and litter size in pigs. Review Series, Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Health, No. 9.Google Scholar
Young, L. D., Pumfrey, R. A., Cunningham, P. J. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1978. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations for prebreeding traits, reproductive traits and principal components. Journal of Animal Science 46: 937–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar