Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:14:23.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of dried grass and cereal-based concentrate on the voluntary intake of unwilted grass silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. A. McIlmoyle  and
J. C. Murdoch
W. A. McIlmoyle
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
J. C. Murdoch
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Summary

Two 7 × 7 Latin square experiments were carried out with British Friesian steers (mean initial live weight 360 kg). In Experiment 1 the effects of different levels of dried grass or concentrate on the intake of silage dry matter (DM) were compared, and in Experiment 2 the effect of a supplement containing various proportions of dried grass: concentrate on the intake of silage DM was examined. In both experiments the digestibility of the ration and the rate of passage of digesta were measured.

In Experiment 1, supplementation depressed intake of silage DM, the difference being significant (P<0·05) at 5·0 and 7·5 kg/day, but there were no significant differences in silage intake between supplements given at the same level. Intake of silage was also significantly lower (P<0·05) in Experiment 2 when a supplement was offered, but differences between supplements were not significant. Total DM intake was increased significantly (P<00·5) by supplementation in both experiments. Supplementation increased energy digestibility but decreased crude fibre digestibility. In Experiment 1 nitrogen digestibility was significantly lower (P<0·05) with dried grass than with concentrate supplementation, but in Experiment 2 supplementation increased the digestibility of nitrogen. In both experiments the mean retention time was shorter, the time for the highest rate of excretion of stained particles was lower, and the maximum rate of excretion higher for dried grass than for silage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 227 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. 1950. Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 4: 361–388.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1965. Rate of passage of digesta through the ruminant digestive tract. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R. W.), pp. 108–123. Butterworth, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Murdoch, J. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughages by cows. J. Dairy Res. 33: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. 1956. The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. 1. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. Br. J. Nutr. 10: 15–23.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. and McDonald, P. 1961. Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 2: 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1975. Milk production from silage and concentrates containing varying proportions of dried grass and cereals. Anim. Prod. 20: 173–179.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Kormos, J. 1973. The effect of level of feeding of dried grass on milk production and the value of dried grass as a replacement for conventional dairy concentrates. Anim. Prod. 16: 235–243.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. and Holmes, W. 1969. The effect of level of feeding on the digestibility of diets for sheep and cattle. Anim. Prod. 11: 11–18.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1976. Effect of silage additives on the intake and performance of male calves and steers. Anim. Prod. 22: 321–328.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A., Murdoch, J. C. and Gordon, F. J. 1975. A note on dried grass as a component of concentrate mixtures for lactating dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 20: 163–166.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. 1974. The performance of early-weaned calves offered concentrates or artificially dried grasses. Anim. Prod. 18: 201–210.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1972. Grass conservation. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1: 85–86.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1962. Change-over designs. Tech. Bull. N. CaroL agric. Exp. Stn, No. 147.Google Scholar
Patton, R. A. and Krause, G. F. 1972. A maximum-likelihood estimator of food retention time in ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 28: 19–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayler, J. C. 1970. Dried forages and beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1972. Mixed diets: effect of combinations of fresh or conserved forages together or with non-forage constituents. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1971, pp. 76–77.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1972. Feed factors in milk production. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1971, pp. 76–77.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1973. Dried grass and barley as a concentrate for milk production. Grass—J. Br. Assoc. Green Crop Driers 6: 3–8.Google Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. and Wilkins, R. J. 1972. The influence of package size and density on the intake of dried grass wafers fed to lambs. Anim. Prod. 14: 335–341.Google Scholar
Wernli, C. G. and Wilkins, R. J. 1971. The voluntary intake of grass silage supplemented with dried grass or barley. Anim. Prod. 13: 397 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Lonsdale, C. R., Tetlow, R. M. and Forrest, T. J. 1972. The voluntary intake and digestibility by cattle and sheep of dried grass wafers containing particles of different size. Anim. Prod. 14: 177–188.Google Scholar