Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T16:45:35.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of diet and of remating interval on milk production and milk composition of the doe rabbit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Fraga ,
M. Lorente ,
R. M. Carabaño  and
J. C. de Blas
M. J. Fraga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
M. Lorente
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
R. M. Carabaño
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. C. de Blas
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The influence of four diets and two remating intervals (1 or 9 days after parturition) on several milk and production traits was studied in 73 lactations of 46 Californian C? × New Zealand $ does. Three diets were formulated to provide increasing levels of fibre concentration (180, 202 and 238 g acid-detergent fibre per kg dry matter (DM)); a fourth diet contained added pork lard (35 g/kg) at the lowest level of fibre. The energy: protein ratio was maintained between 72 and 84 kj digestible energy (DE) per g digestible protein.

The DE intake increased significantly when fat was included in the diet but was not affected by dietary fibre concentration. An increase in the DE content of the diet tended to decrease food conversion ratio at a mean rate of 0·16 kg/kg per MJ/kg DE. Fat addition also improved milk yield, litter weight at 21 days and survival index, mainly when litter size was higher than nine pups born alive. Neither live-weight gain nor prolificacy of does were affected by any of the variables studied.

The type of diet did not affect milk DM, crude protein, fat and energy concentrations, the mean values being 287·8, 116·1, 134·2 g/kg and 27·73 MJ/kg, respectively. The proportions of short- and medium-chain fatty acids in milk fat were not affected by type of diet. The effect of fat addition on milk fat composition was limited to the long-chain fatty acids, mainly C18: 0 and C18: 1. These changes in addition to differences in milk intake could also affect the survival index of pups.

Does remated 1 day after parturition showed a lower total milk yield than those remated 8 days later, the decrease being more apparent at the end of lactation. Remating interval did not affect the other variables studied.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 459 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. R., Sadler, K. C., Knauer, M. W., Wippler, J. P. and Marshall, R. T. 1974. Composition of cottontail rabbit milk from stomachs of young and directly from gland. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 1449–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blas, J. C. de and Gálvez, J. F. 1975. A note on the retention of energy and nitrogen in rabbits. Animal Production 21: 345–347.Google Scholar
Blas, J. C. de, Rodriguez, J. M., Santomá, G. and Fraga, M. J. 1984. The nutritive value of feeds for growing fattening rabbits. I. Energy evaluation. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research 7: 72–74.Google Scholar
Cheeke, P. R. 1974. Feed preferences of adult male Dutch rabbits. Laboratory Animal Science 24: 601–604.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J. and Spreadbury, D. 1975. Nutrition of the New Zealand White rabbit. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 34: 75–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dils, R. R. 1986. Comparative aspects of milk fat synthesis. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 904–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finzi, A. and Veritá, P. 1976. Valutazione dell'appetibilita dei mangimi nei conigli. Conigliocultura 13: 25–27.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1972. Least-squares and maximum likelihood general purpose program. Ohio State University, Columbus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Koehl, P. F. 1981. Resultats de la O.T.E.I.T.A.V.I. Lapin 1980. Cuniculture 8: 239.Google Scholar
Lebas, F. 1984. Alimentation des lapins. In L'Alimentation des Animaux Monogastriques, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, pp. 77–84.Google Scholar
Méndez, J., Blas, J. C. de and Fraga, M. J. 1986. The effects of diet and remating interval after parturition on the reproductive performance of the commercial doe rabbit. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1624–1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerio de Agricultura, Pescay Alimentación. 1977. Métodos Oficiales de Análisis: Aceites y Grasas. Madrid.Google Scholar
Moser, B. D. 1985. The use of fat in show diets. In Recent Developments in Pig Nutrition (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Haresign, W.), pp. 201–210. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1977. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 9. Nutrient Requirements of Rabbits. 2nd ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G. 1986. Meeting the protein and energy requirements of the commercial rabbit for growth and reproduction. 3rd World Congress of Animal Nutrition, Madrid, pp. 271–277.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G., Allan, S. J., Findlay, M. and Corrigall, W. 1984. The effects of reducing the remating interval after parturition on the reproductive performance of the commercial doe rabbit. Animal Production 39: 465–472.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. D., Findlay, M. and Fordyce, R. A. 1986. Fat supplementation of diets for growing rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 16: 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, G. G., Fuller, M. F. and Pullar, J. D. 1983. Energy and nitrogen metabolism of lactating rabbits. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 507–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, G. G., Lobley, G. E. and Fordyce, R. A. 1986. Energy and nitrogen metabolism of rabbits during pregnancy, lactation, and concurrent pregnancy and lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 56: 199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perret, J. P., Dorier, A. and Bacoues, C. 1977. [Milk triglyceride patterns during the first three weeks of lactation in the normal or early drying-off doe rabbit.] Annales de Biologie Animal Biochimique et Biophysique 17: 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, J. E. 1981. Supplemental dietary fat for peripartal sows: a review. Journal of Animal Science. 53: 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoma, G., Blas, J. C. de, Carabano, R. M. and Fraoa, M. J. 1987. The effects of different fats and their inclusion level in diets for growing rabbits. Animal Production 45: 291–300.Google Scholar
Seerley, R. W., Snyder, R. A. and McCampbell, H. C. 1981. The influence of sow dietary lipids and choline on piglet survival, milk and carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 52: 542–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of Association of Analytical Chemists 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Waller, R. A. and Duncan, D. B. 1969. A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. Journal of American Statistical Association 65: 1484.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. 1971. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar