Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:13:35.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of correction factors on response to selection in beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. P. Jones  and
I. R. Hopkins
L. P. Jones
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
I. R. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Progeny of younger dams grow more slowly than those of older dams. When the environmental effects of dam age are not allowed for in selection for growth rate, selection differentials and genetic responses to selection are reduced.

In a model herd, with cows aged 2 to 8 years, it was found that neglecting the dam age effects reduced genetic gains by about 15% when selection is for weaning weight, and by 11 to 7 % when selection is at an age of 12 to 20 months. Much of the reduction occurs because of the selection of higher proportions from genetically inferior groups.

If genetic differences among dam age groups are small the reduction is only 7% at weaning and less at older ages. The effect of ignoring calf age was also estimated. It was found that if calves born within a period of 33 days were compared and calf age was neglected, the response to selection for weaning weight would be reduced by about 6%.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 211 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, R. L., Carter, A. H., Cox, E. H. and Templer, H. A. 1974. Influence of birth date and dam's age on early growth in beef cattle. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 34: 115–130.Google Scholar
Bichard, M., Pease, A. H. R., Swales, P. H. and Ozkutuk, K. 1973. Selection in a population with overlapping generations. Anim. Prod. 17: 215–227.Google Scholar
Hopkins, I. R. 1977. The effects of selection on sex differences in pre-weaning growth in beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 25: 39–45.Google Scholar
Hopkins, I. R. and James, J. W. 1977. Some optimum selection strategies and age structures with overlapping generations. Anim. Prod. 25: 111–132.Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1977. A note on selection differential and generation length when generations overlap. Anim. Prod. 24: 109–112.Google Scholar
National Beef Recording Scheme. 1978. N.B.R.S. Recording Manual A. B.R.I. University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Straw, W. M. and Jones, L. P. 1977. Estimation of environmental effects on post-weaning gain and yearling weight of beef cattle. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 17: 885–891.Google Scholar