Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:27:37.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of concentrate: silage ratio and of hoof trimming on lameness in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. J. Manson  and
J. D. Leaver
F. J. Manson
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Crichton Royal Farm, Dumfries
J. D. Leaver
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Crichton Royal Farm, Dumfries
Get access

Abstract

During weeks 3 to 26 of lactation, two groups of 24 cows were offered either a 60:40 (high) or a 40:60 (low) ratio of concentrate dry matter:silage dry matter. The 40:60 diet was restricted to give the same daily metabolizable energy and crude protein intake. The hooves of half the cows on each diet were trimmed prior to the experiment, the other half remaining untrimmed. The high concentrate ratio significantly increased locomotion score (high scores indicating poorer locomotion), and the number and duration of clinical cases of lameness. Trimming of hooves significantly reduced the number and diiration of clinical cases. Hoof growth was significantly increased by trimming. Hoof hardness was significantly reduced by the high concentrate ratio. The low concentrate ratio had 8/24 cows lame for an average of 3·3 weeks compared with 11 cows for 3·9 weeks on the high ratio. There were 7/24 trimmed cows lame for 3·1 weeks compared with 12 untrimmed cows lame for 4·2 weeks. The main hoof lesions were solar ulcers and heel erosion. There was no significant effect on milk yield, but milk protein was signficantly increased by the high concentrate ratio. Condition score was significantly negatively correlated with locomotion score.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , August 1989 , pp. 15 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersson, A. and Bergman, A. 1980. Pathology of bovine laminitis especially as regards vascular lesions. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 21: 559–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baggott, D. and Russell, A. M. 1981. Lameness in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 137: 113–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. K. and Rakes, A. H. 1982. Effect of methionine hydroxy analog supplementation on dairy cattle hoof growth and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 1493–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, R. W., Coburn, K. S., Cook, H. M. and Allison, M. J. 1975. Preliminary study of appearance of endotoxins in circulatory system of sheep and cattle after induced grain engorgement. American Journal of Veterinary Research 36: 831–832.Google Scholar
Hunter, E. A., Patterson, M. D. and Talbot, M. 1973. Edex-Analysis of Experiments. ARC Unit of Statistics, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1976. Influence of the composition of the ration and the feeding frequency on pH-regulation in the rumen and on feed intake in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 3: 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaver, J. D. and Webster, D. M. 1982. Assessment of lameness in dairy cattle. West of Scotland Agricultural College, Crichton Royal Farm Report 1982, pp. 32–34.Google Scholar
Livesey, C. T. and Fleming, F. L. 1984. Nutritional influences on laminitis, sole ulcer and bruised sole in Friesian cows. Veterinary Record 114: 510–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, F. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1988a. The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47: 185–190.Google Scholar
Manson, F. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1988b. The influence of dietary protein intake and of hoof trimming on lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47: 191–199.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania State University. 1980. Minitab. 2nd ed. Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, Boston.Google Scholar
Peterse, D. J., Korver, S., Oldenbroek, J. K. and Talmon, F. P. 1984. Relationship between levels of concentrate feeding and incidence of sole ulcers in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 115: 629–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smedegaard, H. H. 1963. Foot rot of the bulb horn of the hoof of breeding bulls in Denmark. Nordisk Veterinaermedicin 15: 430–452.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1986. Milk composition. In Principles and Practice of Feeding Dairy Cows (ed. Broster, W. H., Phipps, R. H. and Johnson, C. L.), Technical Bulletin, National Institute for Research in Dairying, No. 8, pp. 203–218.Google Scholar
Toussaint-raven, E. 1985. Cattle Footcare and Claw Trimming. Farming Press Ltd, Ipswich.Google Scholar
Weaver, A. D. 1979. The prevention of bovine laminitis. Bovine Practitioner 15: 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar