Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:26:19.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of age on tooth loss and the performance of Masham ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. E. Newton  and
Caroline Jackson
J. E. Newton
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Caroline Jackson
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

The rate of incisor, pre-molar and molar tooth loss was studied in two groups of Masham ewes, one from 8·75 to 12·25 years of age, and the other from 7·25 to 9·25 years of age. Incisors were lost at the rate of 0·93 per year in group 1 and pre-molars from the lower jaw at the rate of 1·04 per year. The rate of loss of molars from the lower jaw and pre-molars from the upper jaw was much slower, whilst there was virtually no loss of molars from the upper jaw.

Mean litter size declined gradually from age 7 in group 1, but there was no decline up to age 9 years in group 2. Lambing percentage declined gradually from age 6 years, with a marked drop after age 10 years caused by an increase in barrenness and lamb mortality. Selling percentage also began to decline from age 6 years but dropped sharply after age 9 years following an increase in the number of lambs having to be reared by hand. Ewe live weight, lamb birth weight and lamb growth to 4 weeks of age showed no decline up to 12 years of age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 421 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Forrest, P. A. and Bichard, M. 1974. Analysis of production records from a lowland sheep flock. 2. Flock statistics and reproductive performance. Anim. Prod. 19: 25–32.Google Scholar
Maijala, K. 1967. Causes of variation in litter size of Finn-sheep ewes. Acta Agralia Fennica 109: 136–143.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1982. Results from Recorded Commercial Flocks in South-West England, 1980–81. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Fenlon, J. S. 1979. The performance of Masham ewes. Anim. Prod. 29: 69–79.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Jackson, Caroline. 1983. A note on the effect of dentition and age in sheep on the intake of herbage. Anim. Prod. 37: 133–136.Google Scholar
Quenouille, M. H., Boyne, A. W., Fisher, W. B. and Leitch, I. 1951. Statistical studies of recorded energy expenditure of man. Tech. Comm., Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr., No. 17. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Yalçin, B. C. and Bichard, M. 1964. Crossbred sheep production. 1. Factors affecting production from the crossbred ewe flock. Anim. Prod. 6: 73–84.Google Scholar