Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:16:04.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestible energy content of cereals and wheat by-products for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. S Batterham ,
C. E. Lewis ,
R. F. Lowe  and
C. J. McMillan
E. S Batterham
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
C. E. Lewis
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
R. F. Lowe
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
C. J. McMillan
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
Get access

Abstract

1. The digestible energy content of eight samples of barley, sorghum, wheat, weather-damaged wheat and wheat by-products produced from different regions of eastern Australia was determined using growing pigs. The relationships between physical and chemical composition and digestible energy content of the meals were studied.

2. The mean and range in digestible energy (MJ/kg, air-dry basis) were, respectively: barleys 12·7 (12·4 to 13·0), sorghums 14·4 (14·1 to 14·9), wheats 14·4 (14·0 to 15·0), weather-damaged wheats 14·1 (12·9 to 14·9) and wheat by-products 12·4 (10·9 to 14·1).

3. All possible regressions of digestible energy content against density, gross energy and proximate analyses of the meals were screened to select useful relationships. These screens indicated that, with the exception of wheat by-products, the majority of variation in digestible energy was due to gross energy and fibre. For wheat by-products, a combination of density and fibre accounted for most of the variation.

4. Prediction equations had the most application to weather-damaged wheats, wheat by-products and a combination of all samples.

5. There was no indication that neutral-detegent fibre was superior to crude fibre as a predictor of digestible energy in cereals for pigs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 259 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S. 1979. Lupinus albus cv. Ultra and Lupinus angustifolius cv. Unicrop as protein concentrates for growing pigs. Aust. J. agric. Res. 30: 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterham, E. S., Lewis, C. E. and McMillan, C. J. 1976. Weather-damaged wheats for pigs. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 11: 401–404.Google Scholar
Drennan, P. and Maguire, M. F. 1970. Prediction of the digestible and metabolisable energy content of pig diets from their fibre content. Ir. J. agric. Res. 9: 197–202.Google Scholar
Henry, Y. M. 1976. Prediction of energy values of feeds for swine from fiber content. Proc. 1st int. Symp. Feed Composition, Anim. Nutr. Requirements and Computerization of Diets, pp. 270–281. Utah State University, Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
Just, A., Jorgensen, H. and Fernandez, J. 1978. The digestibility, ME and NE content of individual feedstuff's for pigs. National Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1976. The feeding value of different classes of wheat for grower finisher pigs. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 16: 668–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. H. and Taverner, M. R. 1975. Prediction of the digestible energy in pig diets from analyses of fibre contents. Anim. Prod. 21: 275–284.Google Scholar
Komoll, R. F. and Fitzsimmons, R. W. 1975. Cereal varieties for 1976. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 86(6): 20–23.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. E. and Lowe, R. F. 1977. Automated amino acid analysis of feedstuff protein using the Technicon NC-2P chromalography system. New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Wollongbar.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. and Payne, P. R. 1959. A ballistic bomb calorimeter. Br. J. Nutr. 13: 501–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mom, K. W. 1971. A time-saving apparatus for the determination of crude fibre. Lab. Pract. 20: 801–802; 805.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. J., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1975a. Energy values in pig nutrition. I. The relationship between digestible energy, metabolizable energy and total digestible nutrient values of a range of feedstuffs. J. agric. Sci., Camh. 84: 7–17.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. J., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1975b. Energy values in pig nutrition. II. The prediction of energy values from dietary chemical analysis. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taverner, M. R. 1975. Sweet lupin seed meal as a protein source for growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 20: 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taverner, M. R., Rayner, C. J. and Biden, R. S. 1975. Amino acid content and digestible energy value of sprouted, rust-affected and sound wheat in pig diets. Aust. J. agric. Res. 26: 1109–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Van soest, P. J. 1969. Newer knowledge on the composition and methods of analysis of feeding stuffs. In The Nutrition of Animals of Agricultural Importance (ed. Cuthbertson, D. P.), pp. 37–58. Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
Van soest, P. J. 1976. Laboratory methods for evaluating the energy value of feedstuffs. In Feed Energy Sources for Livestock (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 83–94. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Van soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J. Ass. off. analyt. Chem. 50: 50–55.Google Scholar
Whiting, F. and Bezeau, L. M. 1954. The nutritional value of frost-damaged and early-harvested cereal grains for swine. Can. J. agric. Sci. 34: 624–634.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1978. The energy evaluation of barley in diets for growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 26: 394 (Abstr.).Google Scholar