Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:25:43.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crossbreeding beef cattle in Western Uganda. 1. Performance of Ankole, Boran and Zebu Cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. C. M. Trail
Affiliation:
Ministry of Animal Industry, Game and Fisheries, Uganda
G. D. Sacker
Affiliation:
Ministry of Animal Industry, Game and Fisheries, Uganda
I. L. Fisher
Affiliation:
Ministry of Animal Industry, Game and Fisheries, Uganda
Get access

Summary

In a new ranching area of Uganda recently cleared of trypanosomiasis, with a high level of disease control, adequate water supplies and extensive grazing on free range, three dam breeds, the indigenous Ankole and Zebu, and the Boran from Kenya, were mated to Boran, Angus and Red Poll sires.

Under artificial insemination, at least 10 % fewer cows were detected on heat than under natural service, and 15% fewer artificially inseminated cows actually produced calves than did naturally served cows. The introduced Boran females were not inferior in calving percentage to the indigenous Ankole and Zebu.

Relationships between dam body weight and progeny performance were investigated. The introduced Boran breeding cows were able to maintain their body weight as least as well as the indigenous Ankole and Zebu cows. While cows which calved regularly and reared their calves could not maintain body weight, it was found that heavier cows conceived at a higher rate than lighter cows, cows heavier at parturition weaned heavier calves than lighter cows, and cows that reared heavier calves lost more, or gained less, body weight than cows that reared lighter calves. It was therefore indicated that investigations into the reduction of lactation stress on cows by such methods as earlier weaning of calves, mating at the most suitable time of year, and possible nutritional supplementation at a stage in the cycle, should be commenced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H. and Plum, M. 1965. Gestation length and birth weight in cattle and buffaloes: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 12241233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, H. P., Morgan, R. F. and Gaines, W. L. 1943. Live weight and milk-energy yield in the Nebraska Station Dairy Herd. J. Dairy Sci. 26: 625641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. Jr., 1965. A biometrical evaluation of weight of beef cows and performance of their progeny. Ph.D. Diss., Texas A. and M. Univ., College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Blunn, C. T. and Baker, M. L. 1950. A study of some of the factors influencing the birth and weaning weights of beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 9: 338346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, G. 1968. Associated pasture production problems. In Proceedings of the Beef Cattle Breeding and Ranching Development Conference, Mbarara, Uganda, pp. 6977. Government Printer, Entebbe.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1960. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. United States Department of Agriculture, ARS-20–8.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. 1964. The relation between body size, conformation and milk yield in dairy cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 32: 421435.Google Scholar
Knapp, B., Lambert, W. V. and Black, W. H. 1940. Factors influencing length of gestation and birth weight in cattle. J. agric. Res. 61: 277.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., Robertson, Alan and Gjelstad, B. 1957. The genetic connexion between body size, milk production and efficiency in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Res. 24: 135143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacker, G. D., Trail, J. C. M. and Fisher, I. L. 1971. Crossbreeding beef cattle in Western Uganda. 2. Environmental influences on body weight. Anim. Prod. 13: 143152.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M., Sacker, G. D. and Fisher, I. L. 1971. Crossbreeding beef cattle in Western Uganda. 3. Genetic analysis of body weight. Anim. Prod. 13: 153163.Google Scholar
U.S.A.I.D. 1963. The Ankole Ranching Development Scheme. Report PIO/T 610-A-14- AA-2–30001, pp. 130. United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Vorster, T. H. 1964. Factors influencing the growth, production and reproduction of different breeds of beef cattle under range conditions in Southern Rhodesia. S. Rhodesia agric. Res. Bull. No. 1. Government Printer, Salisbury.Google Scholar
Yates, F. 1934. The analysis of multiple classifications with unequal numbers in the different classes. J. Am. statist. Ass. 29: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar