Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:29:39.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of two indoor farrowing systems for sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. B. Robertson ,
R. Laird ,
J. K. S. Hall ,
R. J. Forsyth ,
J. M. Thomson  and
J. Walker-Love
J. B. Robertson
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr
R. Laird
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr
J. K. S. Hall
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr
R. J. Forsyth
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr
J. M. Thomson
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr
J. Walker-Love
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr
Get access

Extract

1. Over a 3-year period 150 farrowings of Large White sows were used to compare a stall farrowing system with a conventional-pen farrowing system.

2. Farrowing in the stall system of management resulted in a significantly lower percentage mortality both at 3 weeks (5·73±2·70%) and at 8 weeks (7·92±2·89%), than in the conventional-pen system.

3. Both total litter and individual pig weights were higher at 3 and 8 weeks in the stall system.

4. Despite higher building and electricity costs the stall system showed a margin of £1, 14s. per litter over the conventional-pen system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1966 , pp. 171 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Heseltine, H. K., 1959. The detection and estimation of low concentration of methyl bromide in air. Pest Techno., 1: 1–253.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food, Veterinary Investigation Service, 1959. A survey of the incidence and causes of mortality in pigs. 1. Sow survey. Vet. Rec., 71: 71–777.Google Scholar
Pig Industry Development Authority, 1959–1961. Pig records, Parts I and II of Official Scheme, Periods I–IV, 1st April 1959–31st March 1961.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., 1956. Statistical Methods, Fifth Edition. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. M., Walker-Love, J., & Forsyth, R. J., 1960. Replanned farrowing facilities for Auchincruive. Agriculture, Land., 67: 67–404.Google Scholar