Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:41:17.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestibility by beef cows of diets based on oat straw and supplemented with different forms of non-protein nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. Fishwick
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
J. J. Parkins
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
R. G. Hemingway
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
N. S. Ritchie
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
Get access

Abstract

Pregnant beef cows were given 2 kg barley per day and oat straw ad libitum. The digestibility of the organic matter of the diet was approximately 53% when urea included in the barley was given in one or four feeds per day. Supplementation of the barley with di-ureido isobutane improved the organic matter digestibility to 56·7%. When a solution containing urea, phosphorus, calcium and sodium was included in the straw the digestibility of the diet was 59·0%. These improved digestibilities were not associated with any differences in the concentrations of ammonia in the rumen liquor or blood of the cows.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Allison, M. J., Bryant, M. P., Katz, I. and Keeney, M. 1962. Metabolic function of branched-chain volatile fatty acids, growth factors for ruminococci. II. Biosynthesis of higher branched-chain fatty acids and aldehydes. J. Bact. 83: 10841093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, D. G. and Trinder, N. 1966. The use of urea and other non-protein nitrogenous substances in rations for ruminants. J. Univ. Newcastle-upon-Tyne agric. Soc. 20: 2133.Google Scholar
Broome, A. W. 1968. The use of non-protein-nitrogen in animal feed. Proc. Univ. Nottingham 2nd Nutrl. Conf. Feed Manufacturers (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 92113. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. and Balch, C. C. 1962. Factors influencing the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. Br.J. Nutr. 16: 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. and Topps, J. H. 1963. Voluntary intake of low protein diets by sheep. Anim. Prod. 5: 269276.Google Scholar
Fishwick, G., Fraser, J., Hemingway, R. G., Parkins, J. J. and Ritchie, N. S. 1974. The voluntary intake and digestibility of oat straw by pregnant beef cows as influenced by urea and phosphorus supplementation contained in molassed sugar-beet pulp. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82: 427432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishwick, G., Fraser, J., Hemingway, R. G., Parkins, J. J. and Ritchie, N. S. 1977. The effects of dietary phosphorus inadequacy during pregnancy and lactation on the voluntary intake and digestibility of oat straw by beef cows and the performance of their calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 143150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishwick, G. and Hemingway, R. G. 1973. Urea phosphate and mono-ammonium phosphate as dietary supplements for sheep fed diets inadequate in phosphorus and nitrogen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81: 139143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemingway, R. G. and Law, L. M. 1975. The effects of coating mixtures of urea phosphate and urea on the concentrations of ammonia in the rumen liquor and blood of cows. Proc. Nutrl. Soc. 34: 52A.Google ScholarPubMed
Hemingway, R. G., Parkins, J. J. and Ritchie, N. S. 1972a. Comparative effects of oral administration of urea and urea phosphate on the concentrations of ammonia and urea in the blood of sheep. Br. vet. J. 128: lxxxiilxxxiv.Google ScholarPubMed
Hemingway, R. G., Parkins, J. J. and Ritchie, N. S. 1972b. Isobutylidene diurea: a new NPN source for growing calves. Farm and Feed Supplies 69: 4.Google Scholar
Hemsley, J. A. and Moir, R. J. 1963. The influence of higher volatile fatty acids on the intake of urea-supplemented low quality cereal hay by sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14: 509517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatsu, E. and Sakaki, Y. 1971. A new non-protein-nitrogen source IBDU forruminants. Chem. Econ. Eng. Rev. 3: 4350.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. and Somerville, S. 1973. Condition scoring of cattle. Bulletin No. 6. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy Allowance and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Tech. Bull. No. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Ritchie, N. S. and Hemingway, R. G. 1971a. Isobutylidene diurea: a slow release non-protein-nitrogen source for ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 56A.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Ritchie, N. S. and Hemingway, R. G. 1971b. Isobutylidene diurea, soya-bean meal and urea as dietary nitrogen supplements for growing lambs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 55A.Google Scholar
Ritchie, N. S., Parkins, J. J. and Hemingway, R. G. 1972. Urea phosphate. A dietary source of non-protein nitrogen with low potential toxicity to ruminants. Br. vet. J. 128: lxxviii–lxxxi.Google Scholar
Tagari, H., Ben-ghedalia, D. and Zamwel, S. 1976. Urea phosphate as a partial protein replacer in sheep concentrate diets. Anim. Prod. 23: 8188.Google Scholar
Tillman, A. D. and Brethour, J. R. 1958. Dicalcium phosphate and phosphoric acid as phosphorus sources for beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 100103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. and Iismaa, O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide i n faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59: 381385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar