Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:14:28.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of silage-based and dried forage-based diets, and the effect of protein supplementation of a silage-based diet for finishing beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen  and
Charlotte A Moore
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Charlotte A Moore
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to compare silage-based and dried forage-based diets for finishing beef cattle and to examine the effects of protein supplementation and formaldehyde treatment of silage on performance and carcass composition. The four diets used consisted, on a dry matter basis, of (1) 700 g/kg formic acid-treated grass silage and 300 g/kg low protein cereal-based concentrate (LPC), (2) 720 g/kg formic acid-treated silage and 280 g/kg high protein cereal/fish meal concentrate, (3) 600 g/kg formaldehyde-treated silage and 400 g/kg LPC, and (4) 480 g/kg artificially dried grass and grass hay and 520 g/kg LPC. The silages were well preserved with 33 to 40 g ammonia N per kg total nitrogen. The diets were offered to 40 British Friesian castrated male cattle which were initially 387 (s.e. 2·9) kg live weight. For diets 1 to 4 respectively metabolizable energy intakes were 91·8, 94·7, 94·9 and 91·8 MJ/day; total nitrogen intakes 192, 234, 189 and 191 g/day; live-weight gains 0/89, 0/93, 0/86 and 0/82 (s.e. 0/045) kg/day; carcass gains 0·51, 0·52, 0·52, 0·52 and 0·50 (s.e. 0·33) kg/day; mean subcutaneous fat depths 5·6, 5·4, 5·3 and 6·0 (s.e. 0·41) mm; marbling scores 3·0, 3·3, 3·2 and 2·6 (s.e. 0·19) and areas of m. longissimus dorsi 65·7, 66·4, 64·7 and 64·3 (s.e. 1·66) cm2. It is concluded that performance, efficiency of energy utilization and carcass fatness were similar for a diet containing 700 g/kg well preserved grass silage and a dried forage-based diet with a similar intake of energy and protein. Protein supplementation of a diet based on formic acid-treated silage or formaldehyde treatment of silage did not affect performance or carcass fatness.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended Procedures for use in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 121–181. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1973. Supplementation of silage with protein for beef cattle. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association Journal 8: 31–41.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1983. Supplementary concentrates for young fattening bulls fed silage. An Foras Taluntais, Animal Production Research Report, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Flynn, A. V. 1976. Effect of conservation system on the composition of the beef carcass. An Foras Taluntais, Animal Production Research Report, pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
Garrigus, R. R., Johnson, H. R., Thomas, N. W., Firth, N. L., Harrington, R. B. and Judge, M. D. 1969. Dietary effects on beef composition. I. Quantitative and qualitative carcass traits. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Chadwick, J. P. and Charles, D. D. 1986. Estimation of the carcass composition of different cattle breeds and crosses from fatness measurements and visual assessments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106: 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Beef carcase grading and classification. In Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing, pp. 163–201. Granada, St. Albans.Google Scholar
Kirby, P. S., Chalmers, A. J. and Hannam, D. A. R. 1983. Fish meal supplementation of grass silage diets for fattening British Friesian steers. Animal Production 36: 538 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kirby, P. S., Outhwaite, J. R. and Jones, T. O. 1985. A comparison of formaldehyde-treated soya bean meal and fish meal as protein supplements for finishing beef cattle given grass silage. Animal Production 40: 552 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilization by growing beef cattle of dried grass given alone or as a supplement to silage. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R. B. 1966. Effect of method of grass conservation and herbage maturity on performance and body composition of beef cattle. Proceedings of the 10th International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 575–580.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R. B. 1967. The growth and body composition of beef cattle fed conserved fodders. In Fodders Conservation (ed. Wilkins, R. J.), Proceedings of the Occasional Symposium, British Grassland Society, No. 3, pp. 121–131.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. and Edwards, R. A. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilisation of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurray, C. H., Logan, E. F., McParland, P. J., McRory, F. J. and O'NEILL, D. G. 1978. Sequential changes in some blood components in the normal neonatal calf. British Veterinary Journal 134: 590–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. and Lobley, G. E. 1980. Factors influencing energy losses during metabolism — thermal losses in ruminants. Proceedings of the 31st European Association of Animal Production Symposium, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ø'KIELY, P. and Flynn, V. 1982. Formic acid/ formaldehyde mixture as a silage preservative. An Foras Talúntais, Animal Production Research Report, pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1975. Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum food utilization. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 22: 151–182.Google ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. and Allen, D. M. 1966. Utilization of salts of volatile fatty acids by growing sheep. 3. Effect of frequency of feeding on the utilization of acetate and propionate by young growing lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 20: 509–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Hovell, F. D. and Alien, D. M. 1966. Utilization of salts of volatile fatty acids by growing sheep. 2. Effect of stage of maturity and hormone implantation on the utilization of volatile fatty acids as sources of energy for growth and fattening. British Journal of Nutrition 20: 307–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of two-cut and three-cut systems of silage making for beef cattle using two cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Animal Production 38: 171–179.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1985. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for calves. Animal Production 41: 293–300.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1988. The effect of implantation with hormonal growth promoters on the response in the performance of beef cattle to protein supplementation of a silage-based diet. Animal Production 47: 21–28.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Moore, C. A. 1988. A comparison of silage-based and dried forage-based diets for finishing beef cattle. Animal Production 47: 29–37.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1982. Utilization of conserved forages. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1982. The utilization of silage protein. In Forage Protein Conservation and Utilization, Commission of the European Communities Seminar, Dublin, pp. 121–145.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. and Tyrrell, H. F. 1979. Effect of formaldehyde and formic acid treatment of orchard grass silage and protein supplementation on intake, growth, feed conversion, and slaughter-balance of Holstein steers. Journal of Animal Science 49: Suppl. 1, pp. 416–417 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A., Laird, R. and Holliday, R. J. 1983. A response to protein supplementation of grass silage for growing and finishing cattle. Animal Production 36: 503 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Weiss, R. L., Baumgardt, B. R., Barr, G. R. and Brungardt, V. H. 1967. Some influences of rumen volatile fatty acids upon carcass composition and performance in growing and fattening steers. Journal of Animal Science 26: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed